601s/700s...

Status
Not open for further replies.
F

frank_f2001

New member
je vien de donner un acompte sur 2 sub mb quart....il son rater 350 watt rms chaque mais J'avais l'intention de leur en donner 300 chaque.....se sont des dvc 4 ohms..... la question est: je doit choisir un ampli qui va me fournir assez de puissance pour pouvoir pousser le 300 watt / cannal sans etre dans le fond pour ne pas distortionner.....j'hésitait enter une 601s et une 700s de RF......je sais que la 601s donne environ 650-700 watt et la 701s donne environ 750-800watt......
laquelle me conseiler vous ?

merci!

Frank
 
Moi, je mettrait un 701s .... il te donnerai plus de 'head room' .... toujours mieux d'avoir un peut d'extra.... tes subs sont fait comme ca aussi, il peut facilement prendre un peut plus de puissance....

Dans mon prochaine installation, j'utilise 140+W rms dans chaque porte pour mes speaker en avant... Les speaker disent 100W rms, mais j'aime toujour avoir un peut plus....

Aussi utiliser 2 MTX 8000 (400W chaque), avec 1500+ W rms dans un boute sceller.... Je les ai utiliser pendant 2 ans sans problemes.... sont maintenant dans mon garage....
 
Mtx subs are junk, the new ones might be better, simply cause of the cone they use. The reason why i say junk is cause theu arent build well, they sound good, but the cone falls apart. very cheap construction.

Edit: I would also use the 701.
 
frank_f2001 said:
pkoi la 701s et non la 700s? je croi que la 700s est une tres bonne ampli memem si elle date un peu plus...
Click to expand...
c'est la meme chose... comme t'as dit, seulement un ans de difference... C'est juste l'habitude d'ecrire....
 
I would go with the 700, i just installed one last week, and MAN it is sweet.
I would defanetaly get the 700 over the 600 RF.
I am very satisfied with it. I picked up the 700S RF AMP from boxster boy!!!!
 
PassatVR6 said:
Mtx subs are junk, the new ones might be better, simply cause of the cone they use. The reason why i say junk is cause theu arent build well, they sound good, but the cone falls apart. very cheap construction.

Edit: I would also use the 701.
Click to expand...

Atually, in comparison to most entry/mid-level subs, they are by far some of the best. I had more problems with Infinity Perfects then I did with these. On my Infinity's I had many problems with the dust cap becoming unglued, and also had 2 fried voice coils.... The 8000 series for MTX I found to be VERY good for their price. Also, in sealed vs. sealed, I found the MTX to perform much better the the Perfect in terms of speed and accuracy. Only thing that was better about the perfect was that it required a slightly smaller box.

As for the 700s, even though it's last years model, I believe no internals were changed in the new model. Only the 2004 went through some major modifications, the 2004 lineup was completly ovehauled with new models and such!
 
With many applications its hit or miss, from my experience you cant overpower both subs. I have dealt with a few mtx subs ( road trasg, 6000 and 8000) and I just find the cone and duscap t0 be cheap. A must for me is woven in tinsel and a solid cone. Sure the suspension is important, but without a good cone or solid tinsel, ur sub isnt gona last.

Actualy i though the road trash where the best out their for 40$ a piece, they did what they were meant to do. now mtx has changed their whole cone deseign to the lines of the alpine style saucer. It will take car of any dustcap issues, but of course the dustcap from the back must be solid.

Anyways mtx subs sound decent/good, but just the reliability thats an issue.
ANd the inifinitys cant take much more then 300rms. In 1 foot box, it was seeing 200 rms, and the sub was getting close to its potential with an unclipped signal.
 
viper2003 said:
I would go with the 700, i just installed one last week, and MAN it is sweet.
I would defanetaly get the 700 over the 600 RF.
I am very satisfied with it. I picked up the 700S RF AMP from boxster boy!!!!
Click to expand...

WORD!!!! :bigup: :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top