Villeneuve doesn't like the writing on the wall

Status
Not open for further replies.
scarface2003 said:
"The wall belongs to us," said David Tanguay, general manager of Villeneuve's Newtown.


why is he an ass? he's not sponsored from those companies and the wall belongs to him....I'm sure if you were in his place you wouldn't have done anything...


stupid haters.
Click to expand...

I agree.

les osti de haters allez donc faire le 1/59843982389 de ses accomplissements..
 
Le pire c'est que ça aurait été si simple pour le propriétaire de Ziggy de mettre un espèce de revêtement par-dessus le fameux mur (sans y toucher bien entendu) et ensuite de faire peinturer/dessiner n'importe quoi sur ce revêtement là ...le propriétaire du mur aurait pas pu dire un mot puisque la publicité n'est pas réellement sur le mur ...

Mais bon, y'en a qui cherchent le trouble faut croire ... et comme certains disent, ça lui fait de la pub dans les media, y doit être mort de rire.
 
Since the Ad can only be seen by clients who are on Ziggy's property, Villeneuve could have just charged a price for using his wall. Because fact is it's not taking anything away from him anyway. If he had any buisness sense he would have done that.

Sure it's Villeneuve's wall, it gives him the 'right' to do what he wants with it, but the fact is there wasn't a reason to do it.
 
c'est une question de principes....si on te paye pour porter du bleu pis que ton voisin peinture ton mur en jaune....ça marche pas.
 
Damo said:
Since the Ad can only be seen by clients who are on Ziggy's property, Villeneuve could have just charged a price for using his wall. Because fact is it's not taking anything away from him anyway. If he had any buisness sense he would have done that.

Sure it's Villeneuve's wall, it gives him the 'right' to do what he wants with it, but the fact is there wasn't a reason to do it.
Click to expand...

no reason to do it?? what if a sponsor paid you thousands and thousands or $$$ and then someone comes paint something else from a rival sponsor....what would you have done?
 
scarface2003 said:
no reason to do it?? what if a sponsor paid you thousands and thousands or $$$ and then someone comes paint something else from a rival sponsor....what would you have done?
Click to expand...

1. He did not paint over anything else, if that's what you were saying.

2. The ad was not visible by anyone other than his own public.

3. He spent alot of money putting up what is considered as a 'piece of art' and had the disrespect to paint over it.

4. I did say that a good solution would have been an agreement between the two to 'rent' his wall for a price.
 
Je crois que la bonne chose à faire aurait été d'endurer pour cette année le dessin mais d'aviser Ziggy que l'an prochain il ne pourrait plus continuer. C'aurait été un déroulement gentlemen au lieu de s'envoyer des lettres d'avocat et de scrapper un dessin qui a pris 3 jours et 1200$ à faire.
 
Carbon_Blue_GT said:
Je crois que la bonne chose à faire aurait été d'endurer pour cette année le dessin mais d'aviser Ziggy que l'an prochain il ne pourrait plus continuer. C'aurait été un déroulement gentlemen au lieu de s'envoyer des lettres d'avocat et de scrapper un dessin qui a pris 3 jours et 1200$ à faire.
Click to expand...

Ziggy aurait pu demander la permission avant de dessiner sur son mur. c'est son probleme s'il a perdu de l'argent lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top