sparcosoul
New member
Agreed with sandro
Next week this never happened
Shell Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Bar Human-Rights Suit
By Bob Van Voris - Feb 28, 2012 2:21 PM ET .LinkedIn Google +1 Print QUEUEQ..Royal Dutch Shell Plc (RDSA) asked the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that the company can't be sued by Nigerians seeking damages for torture and murders committed by their government in the early 1990s.
The high court in Washington is considering whether companies are exempt from two statutes imposing liability for human-rights violations. Shell, Europe's biggest oil company, argued today that the Alien Tort Statute, which dates to 1789, can't be used to sue corporations. The Nigerian plaintiffs claim there's nothing in the law that limits liability to individuals.
"We do not urge a rule of corporate impunity here," said Kathleen Sullivan, a lawyer for Shell. "Corporate officers are liable for human-rights violations and for those they direct among their employees. There can also be suits under state law or the domestic laws of nations. But there may not be ATS federal common-law causes of action against corporations."
The case, Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., was filed in 2002 by 12 Nigerians claiming they were harmed by "widespread and systematic human rights violations" committed by the regime of the former military dictator Sani Abacha, including torture, executions, illegal detentions and indiscriminate killings in the Ogoni region of the Niger Delta.
'No Claim'
Paul Hoffman, who represents the Nigerian plaintiffs, criticized Shell's position, arguing that "even if these corporations had jointly operated torture centers with the military dictatorship in Nigeria to detain, torture, and kill all opponents of Shell's operations in Ogoni, the victims would have no claim."
rest of article: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...upreme-court-to-bar-human-rights-suit-1-.html
-
thanks to February 28, 2012 Russia Today News & http://MOXNews.com
I cite fair use fair dealings for any copyrighted material
LOL true storyAm I the only one or does everyone automatically skip over a post with an irrelevant youtube video, some headers in color and a quoted block of text in italics with some bold because they know it's an illuminance post?