Tech-Boy
Legacy Member
So, my squad started this debate about 6-7 years ago while drunk, obviously.. and because of the hammer attack in Laval yesterday we've been going at it in group text. Its kind of our "If a tree falls in the woods" debate, and we're split, half take hammer and half take knife.
The debate is.. you are fighting a clone of yourself, so same strength, agility, reach advantage etc.. one has a standard claw hammer, the other a 4" hunting knife. Fight to the death, who wins?
I myself am on team hammer, I like the reach advantage and feel that unless I get stabbed real good in the stomach I win with the hammer. Even a poorly swung hammer can compound fracture an arm or leg, even missing direct impact with the face of the hammer will do damage.. whereas with a knife, grazing or stabbing will not stop me. I also like the fact that I can turn the hammer around for some clawing action.
Here is some evidence we've found, according to our sources hammer is winning 2-0
http://www.functionalselfdefense.org/weapons/hammer-vs-knife
Discuss.
The debate is.. you are fighting a clone of yourself, so same strength, agility, reach advantage etc.. one has a standard claw hammer, the other a 4" hunting knife. Fight to the death, who wins?
I myself am on team hammer, I like the reach advantage and feel that unless I get stabbed real good in the stomach I win with the hammer. Even a poorly swung hammer can compound fracture an arm or leg, even missing direct impact with the face of the hammer will do damage.. whereas with a knife, grazing or stabbing will not stop me. I also like the fact that I can turn the hammer around for some clawing action.
Here is some evidence we've found, according to our sources hammer is winning 2-0
http://www.functionalselfdefense.org/weapons/hammer-vs-knife
Discuss.