New Mazda 6

The next-generation Mazda6 is zooming right into 2009, and looks primed and ready to take on all comers in the ever-evescalating war of midsize sedans.Mazda says that the sporty-looking second-generation Mazda6 was engineered specifically with the North American market in mind. For instance, it will have a focus on larger dimensions both inside and out, as well as more power coming from both engine choices. Mazda says this midsize sedan will “take on the very best cars from Asia, Europe and North America.”

A new Mazda-designed 2.5-litre 4-cylinder engine will be available in the Mazda6, as well as a 3.7-liter V6 - the same one used by the 2008 CX-9. Transmission choices are a six-speed manual or five-speed automatic with manual-shift mode (2.5-liter engine), or a six-speed automatic with manual-shift mode (3.7-liter V6).

Though many current midsize cars are available in coupe form, the 2009 Mazda6 will only be available as a four-door model. Suspension will be all-independent, with four-wheel disc brakes and ABS coming standard. Mazda also points out that the automaker’s new sedan will have ‘unparalleled reductions’ in road noise and vibrations.

Two trim levels will be available - GS and GT - and both will be available with either engine.

Built in Flat Rock, Michigan, the new Mazda6 will go on sale in the summer of 2008.

Audi Q5

This article is only available in french. La catégorie des VUS compact de luxe est en plein effervescence. Les BMW X3 et Land Rover Freelander ont fait cavalier seul pendant quelques dans ce segment, mais l’arrivée récente de véhicules comme l’Acura RDX et l’Infiniti EX est venue changer les choses. Sous peu, Volvo introduira aussi son deuxième utilitaire sport, le XC60. Et voilà qu’Audi vient tout juste de dévoiler officiellement son nouveau joueur dans ce segment, le Q5.D’abord lancé en Europe, le Q5 sera offert là-bas avec un choix de trois motorisations. Deux d’entre-elles seront des diesel, tandis que l’autre, à essence, nous sera le seul destiné. Il s’agit d’un V6 de 3,2 litres FSI développant 265 chevaux et 243 lb-pi de couple. Ce moteur sera accompagné d’une boîte automatique Tiptronic à changement rapide ainsi que du système de traction intégrale Quattro à prise permanente. Notons que ce système permet d’offrir jusqu’à 85% du couple aux roues arrière, mais aussi jusqu’à 65% vers l’avant.

Avec le Q5, Audi n’entend pas offrir un véhicule d’entrée de gamme. Le niveau de luxe et de caractéristiques de série promet donc d’être relevé, comme en fait foi le communiqué de presse. On parle ici d’un système d’accès et de démarrage sans clé, de la climatisation automatique à trois zones, de la sellerie de cuir avec assise chauffante et d’une chaîne audio à huit haut-parleurs. Le Q5 sera aussi le premier véhicule à adopter la troisième évolution du système d’interface MMI.

Bien sûr, le prix du Q5 n’a pas encore été dévoilé. Le véhicule devrait fait son apparition en Amérique du Nord d’ici environ un an.

Volks Jetta: The fair tale continues

Once upon a time, there existed a very good German automobile that was accessible to all peoples of the world. It was named Beetle, and it was the best selling car in the world for some four decades.

Its diminutive exterior camouflaged a remarkably roomy interior, partly due to mounting the wheels outside the bodywork, and allowed the car to go just about anywhere on earth, regardless of path width.

It was a happy little car with a very small rear-mounted engine that could handle the dirtiest of fuel without complaint, and when it was loaded up with people, it had remarkable traction from its rear wheels, but very light steering.

But the world was changing, so Beetle’s maker (who went by the very descriptive name of Volkswagen) decided to offer a more “acceptable” car for the masses in the form of a front-engined, front-wheel-drive hatchback called Golf. Like the swan into which the ugly duckling matured, Golf was about the same size as the aging Beetle but had the versatility of a boxy design, albeit a smidgen less interior comfort for passengers, and the attractiveness of updated engineering.

Alas, in North America, the Golf was not the charming prince Volkswagen expected to awaken sales from their princess-like slumber in the largest market in the world. Even a cute bunny-rabbit name (because Americans considered Golf a diversion, not a conveyance) couldn’t get Americans to consider purchasing it.

So in 1980, Volkswagen created a four-door sedan out of Golf and called it Jetta (Bora, Atlantic, Fox, Vento or Sagitar in other parts of the world). Like the knight in shining armour, Jetta was highly regarded and widely accepted by the buyers in North America due to its slightly upscale equipment levels and the perceived premium German engineering over the Japanese compacts of the time.

Through to the latest (fifth) generation, Jetta has retained the qualities that made it initially desirable — easy access to seating, large trunk, economical engine and superb handling — while steadily improving on the things potential buyers didn’t like — heavy steering, confusing switchgear, noise in the cabin and diminished rear seat room — with each generation improving on the previous one.

Presently, Jetta receives motivation from a standard 170-hp 2.5-litre five-cylinder engine or a 200-hp turbocharged 2.0-litre four. The base engine is plenty powerful when Jetta is already moving, but makes the car feel sluggish when pulling away from a standstill. It’s by no means a tortoise, but it would require considerably better get-up-and-go to be classified as a hare.

One of the previous concerns addressed in the current generation is shift quality, with a slick six-speed manual standard fare, to be optionally replaced by a six-speed automatic with sequential shift mode (previous Jettas’ automatics were widely poo-poo’d, probably because they mostly took off in second gear unless the driver wanted more oomph by pressing the right pedal to the floor).

Fit and finish has also been remarkably improved from the early generations and Jetta doors close with a satisfying and secure “thunk.” The downside with the sure-closing mechanism is that rear-seat access is sometimes compromised in tight confines when the rear doors don’t open as wide as they are able.

Many occupants will now find comfortable seating front and rear on premium fabric upholstery that is not too cold in the winter nor too hot in the summer. Previous generations’ complaints of compressed headroom should not resurface unless said occupants followed Jack down the beanstalk.

The only drawback to extended rearseat comfort is the absence of a cupholder, which apparently is available as part of the optional centre armrest; however, surely a door pocket could be extended to create a place for a water bottle.

The final complaint to be addressed was price, with previous generations often keeping potential buyers at bay due to prices that were higher than those of Jetta’s closest competitors.

The new model year dawns with lower suggested pricing than the previous one, probably due to the strong loonie performance against the American greenback. With starting prices falling below $30,000 (all but the top of the line trim), Jetta is now priced equally to competitors such as the Mazda3 or the Subaru Impreza.

And the motto of the story is: Jetta’s a good car!

Fact File

2008 Volkswagen Jetta 2.5

As tested, before tax: $29,475

Configuration: front engine/FWD

Options: Comfortline package ($2,500) includes chrome exterior trim, front and rear floor mats, heatable washer nozzles, front centre armrest, leather-wrapped steering wheel, 16-in. alloy wheels, heated front bucket seats, premium audio system with in-dash 6-CD changer; auto transmission ($1,400); power sunroof ($1,400); electronic stability system ($450); side curtain airbags ($250)

Freight: $1,335

Engine/Transmission: 2.5L I5/6-speed automatic with sequential shift

Horsepower: 170 @ 5,000 rpm

Torque: 170 lb.-ft. @ 3,500 rpm

Fuel required: 60 litres, regular

EnerGuide fuel ratings (L/100 km): 11.0 city; 7.2 hwy.

Observed fuel economy: 8.9 L/100 km combined over 743 km

Warranty: 4 years/80,000 km

Model price range: $23,475 - $30,375

Engines available: 2.5L I5 (170 hp/170 lb.-ft.); 2.0L turbo I4 (200/207)

Transmissions available: 6-speed manual; 6-speed auto with sequential shift

Competition: Chevrolet Cobalt, Honda Civic; Hyundai Elantra; Mazda3, Mitsubishi Lancer; Nissan Sentra, Pontiac G5, Subaru Impreza, Toyota Corolla

Strengths: Economical; sports sedan handling; solid fit and finish

Weaknesses: Higher price than some rivals; anemic power from standstill

SEMA 2007

The 2007 SEMA industry show kicked off yesterday in Vegas. This show is not like any other and sets the standard for size, hype, people, cars and extravagance. One day of walking allowed us to cover only about a quarter of the booth space in the wheel and tire section. People from all over the world come to attend this show for aftermarket industry players only (its not open to the public). Most kiosks have private conference rooms for business meetings. Every kioske is from a big name manufacturer with the money to bring the badest rides on earth.

View 808 photos

 

Explanation of towings paints a different picture

Last month MontrealRacing.com reported on the large numbers of modified vehicles being towed in the Montreal area. Many members were at a loss to explain why their modified vehicles were being towed by Police instead of being issued inspection. We set up a meeting with the officers who were involved to find out what the situation was.

The Montreal Police Special Services division is located at Neighbourhood station 23, just south of the Olympic Stadium in the East end of Montreal. This division takes care of non conventional matters such as vehicle modifications. Present at the meeting were tuning specialist André Côté, Constable Savard, Constable Bégin and two other officers of station 23.

The officers began by explaining a little bit about where the laws on modified vehicles can be found. As most people are already aware the SAAQ has a basic guide for modified vehicles which can be found here. However there is another document called the Mechanical Inspection Guide which goes into much more detail about the severity of certain infractions. In the legend it explains that a yellow exclamation mark is found next to a minor infraction and a red hand is found next to major infractions.

On pages 76-78 you’ll find details infractions with respect to tires. Some major infractions include tires that can rub against a fixed part of the vehicle, tires that have been worn past the tread indicator and tires where the metal reinforcement filament is protruding or is visible. If you search through the document you can find examples of other major infractions such as a cracked frame or headlights & taillights that do not function.

These major infractions are significant because the CSR section 636.2 gives police permission to issue tickets, issue inspections, or seize a vehicle if it has a major infraction. The police explained that every vehicle that was towed had a major infraction and showed a photo to prove it. Each and every car that was issued tickets, sent to inspection or seized was fully documented with photo evidence in the event the case goes to court.

Some of the cars in the photos were appalling in terms of road worthyness. A majority of them were towed for tires that were in contact with the fenders or tires that were worn past their limit of use. There were cars that had so much metal protruding from the tires that it’s amazing they were still inflated. Some cars tires were rubbing so much against the inside of the fenders that it looked as if someone took a knife and started hacking away at the tire.

Many of these owners are MontrealRacing.com members as was evident by the number of new discussions created on the subject last month. What the police found interesting and wanted to point out was that the impression these individuals were giving in the discussion forum (yes the police do read the forum) that nothing was wrong with their vehicles and that they were victims of an injustice. The evidence the police had gathered seemed to indicate otherwise. Perhaps the number of new discussions was resulting not so much because the owners thought their vehicles were legal but that the severity of the consequences was highly unexpected. It was after all the first we’ve heard of vehicles being towed for modifications. Nevertheless the law gives police this power in certain situations.

Other infractions were given for the usual illegal modifications such as any aftermarket muffler (illegal for a few years now) vehicles without orange reflectors in the front or red reflectors in the rear, windshield band stickers greater than 15 cm from the top, removal of air bags, removal of factory seat belts, removal of the rubber on the pedals (apparently it looks more race-like), and window tints that are too dark. All of these modifications are prohibited by the guide put out by the SAAQ years ago and should be common knowledge by now. If you don’t modify your car on the cheap then you will have no problems whatsoever.

They explained that contrary to what we had reported, most of the vehicles seized were done during other police traffic operations and not specifically targeted.

So why is this happening now, who is involved and what can we expect from the police in the future? This was addressed in the meeting but there are a few points that need to be examined further before we can report on it. A follow up article will be written in the coming weeks to address these issues as well as some additional legal ones that have come to our attention since the meeting.

After the meeting we went to go look at the MontrealRacing.com Integra Type R. The vehicle has a set of Neuspeed sport springs, 17-inch Fast wheels with 205-40-17 tires, a carbon fiber hood, AEM cold air intake and a factory Acura skirt kit. The tires are at their limit of usage and will need to be changed soon as indicated by the marker on the tire. The metal is not protruding from the inner sidewall as is common when a vehicle has negative camber. The turn signals can be replaced for white ones as long as a yellow reflector is present near the signal. The exhaust is stock so there is no problem there.

Discuss this article in the forums

Police Towings Spark Row in Modified Car Scene

A series of police operations in downtown Montreal have sparked outrage in the modified (tuning) car scene.

Over the last few months police have towed many vehicles after having stopped them at locations downtown, most of them MontrealRacing.com members. According to witnesses the police will set up at a particular location (often near the west end of downtown) and wait for vehicles that appear to be modified to drive by. Once they have been stopped an officer inspects the car for the most common illegal modifications such as aftermarket mufflers, window tints that are too dark and colored head lamps or side lamps.

If the vehicle is deemed to have violated any of the modification guidelines published by the SAAQ (click here to view the document), the officer seizes the vehicle on the spot and sends it to the impound lot at the owner’s expense. Costs related to get a vehicle out of the pound are $40 per day plus the cost of towing which is around $100 to the pound. You then need to pay several more hundred to be towed from the pound to a SAAQ certified garage for inspection because they will not allow you to drive it off the lot.

Vehicle owners that have had their cars towed as a result of these incidents are claiming that their vehicles conform to the SAAQ guidelines and that the police are abusing their powers.

One of these people is Chris McIntosh who drives a 2000 Jetta VR6.

“It’s getting ridiculous now. They cracked down a few years ago when there were no real laws for modified cars. Enough people got angry that the SAAQ published this guideline for modified car owners. I think a lot of people are fine with respecting that but now it seems that the cops are not respecting it. Since when can you tow a car for being too low? The SAAQ says that a cop can send you to inspection, not tow you. They are not mechanics. That is why we have SAAQ certified garages for this sort of thing.”

McIntosh was forced to pay $160 to get his car out of the pound, another $300 for the towing and received $437 in fines for an illegal exhaust and wheels that were too large for the car according to what the ticket said. Two other vehicles – a Honda Civic SIR and a Volkswagen Golf were also towed at the same time as McIntosh in an incident that took place on Crescent Street on July 21.

Junior, another MontrealRacing.com member, had his Chevy Blazer seized and towed September 8 on Rene Levesque at the corner of Fort just as he was about to enter the access ramp to highway 720. The Blazer has only a lowered suspension but he did not receive a ticket indicating an infraction.

Most recently Katay, the organizer of one of the largest car shows in Quebec - Car Fever, got his Subaru STI seized at the corner of Peel and St-Catherine on Sept 19. Katay’s STI is modified with wheels and a lowered suspension however it appears to conform to the SAAQ guidelines from the photos we’ve taken of it.

In every incident it is a police officer by the name of Bégin who is present and conducting the inspection. McIntosh says, M. Begin is knowledgeable on the subject but also very vindictive, meaning that the matter is not open for debate. If he doesn’t like your vehicle it will be towed.

According to the Code de la Sécurité Routière, an officer has a right to stop any vehicle for inspection if there is reason to believe the vehicle might be in violation of the law. What is unclear is on what grounds a vehicle can be towed. Our legal experts here on MontrealRacing.com were unable to come up with an explanation as to why so many vehicles are being towed. There is no dispute that an officer can have a car towed under exceptional circumstances such as drunk driving but now it appears that M. Bégin and his superiors are applying this to modified vehicles in violation of the CSR. Until now the general consensus was that if a vehicle has an illegal modification the driver would be ticketed and/or sent to inspection so that a qualified mechanic could determine if the vehicle is safe for the road.

Ironically, many car enthusiasts applaud the police for cracking down on annoying loud exhausts, silly colored lights and other tacky & annoying modifications. Unfortunately even tasteful and safe aftermarket parts are becoming the target. If this is the case, modified vehicle owners should take great care to either make sure their vehicle conforms to the letter of the law and if not then to stay away from the downtown area for the time being.

Update 9/21/2007: In an effort to help the community and to find out what exactly the nature of M. Begin’s operation is, we contacted the MUC Police and requested an interview with him and his superiors. Our inquiry was returned within hours and friendly officer at the department of media relations for the MUC Police told us that the request was being passed on to the Directeur de la Sécurité Routière and that we’d be contacted by him in the near future.

We received a call back shortly afterwards by M. André Côté who is the Police Officer responsible for all issues relating to modified vehicles in Montreal. You may have seen him at one of the local car shows driving the Police modified Honda Civic SIR. M. Côté is the best possible person we could be working with. He is very knowledgeable and understanding of the tuning industry. We will be attempting to set up a meeting between us and M. Bégin next week. The goal of this meeting will be to verify their legal interpretation of the towing incidents under the CSR and to find out exactly what the scope of the whole operation is.

If an understanding cannot be reached where towing isn’t the best possible course of action then the next goal of the meeting would be to find out exactly what renders a vehicle in violation of the law and to pass this information on to the community so that everyone can make sure their vehicle is legal.

Please stay tuned for the next update which will be on Monday Sept 24th.

Update 9/24/2007: We spoke to M. Côté this morning and are still trying to schedule a meeting with M. Bégin but have not been able to get in contact with him yet. We should get an answer by the end of the week.

Update 10/01/2007: Unfortunately we still do not have any news to report. It seems that the parties involved are not too keen on the idea of a meeting however we are going to persist until we get some answers.

Update 10/09/2007: The meeting is now scheduled for Wednesday Oct 10th at 10am. Some people were on vacation which was the reason for the delay. Expect a full report of the meeting to be posted late Wednesday or early Thursday morning only.

Discuss this article in the forums

Nous voulons des voitures coupé-sport

You wonder sometimes about car manufacturers. Occasionally vehicles are released that just make one stop and say “what are they thinking?” Cars like the Cadillac Cimmaron and Pontiac Aztec are perfect examples of total failure at the corporate level. Sometimes the car companies do not make actual blunders but still leave you wondering what’s going on behind the scenes. Sports car enthusiasts often seem to get the short end of the stick and are left shaking their heads.

For years BMW had a virtual monopoly on the luxury sport coupe segment with the 3-series. Their coupes are well made, sporty and just plain good looking. Then in 2004, Nissan shocked the industry with the release of the beautiful Nissan 350Z and Infiniti G35 coupe. The duo stole the heart of just about every car enthusiast I know. Often I’ve heard people say that (supercars aside) the G35 coupe is the most beautiful car on the road today. I have to say I’d be hard pressed to disagree with that statement. Nissan hit the nail on the head and gave us enthusiasts exactly what we wanted: unbelievable value in a modestly-priced luxury sports car. BMW had little reason to be worried though as their clients stand by the BMW brand like no other but for those who didn’t have their heart set yet, the new duo provided a nice alternative.

The 350Z and G35 coupe reinvigorated Nissan to a certain level of status it hadn’t known since the original Z. I’d have expected a few of the other manufacturers to follow suit but sadly those expectations have not been met. There have been many rumours of a Lexus IS coupe and even some fancy photoshops but where the heck is it? Acura has no plans to bring back the CL luxury coupe that it discontinued in 2003. Mercedes has the C230 Sport coupe but I’d have a hard time classifying it as a sports car. The message conveyed to the auto industry should have been that we want more vehicles like the 350Z and G35 coupe. Why aren’t they listening??

Why did a vehicle like the Acura CL fail when obviously there was a huge demand for this class of car? In my opinion, a sport coupe should be smaller and sleeker. The CL reminded me of a 2nd generation TL minus the rear doors coupled with a bubbly rear end. If I’m buying a coupe, practically isn’t the first thing on my mind. Curiously though the Accord coupe does fairly well and it seems as big and bulky as the CL was. Perhaps the market for entry level coupes differs somewhat form luxury sport coupes but Honda could benefit from following Nissan’s lead in this segment. Since you shouldn’t mess with success, keeping the Accord coupe around its probably wise but the more gutsy move of bringing back the Prelude and CL with newer sleeker designs to compete with the 350Z and G35 would be quite popular among enthusiasts.

As I mentioned before, we are still waiting for an IS coupe to make an appearance. The current IS is sexy enough that it would probably be considered by many would-be coupe buyers except for the fact that Lexus seems to have a love for automatic transmissions. The only model available with a manual transmission is the IS250 RWD. That means that if you want AWD you’re out of luck. If you want an engine that can actually give other cars in the segment a run for their money you are also out of luck. Thank you Lexus for overlooking the enthusiast crowd, most of whom driving an automatic or “tiptronic” vehicle just doesn’t cut it. If BMW can offer a manual AWD vehicle then Lexus can as well. Until then, scratch them off the list of real performance contenders.

GM’s Cadillac CTS-V is also a potential competitor here. Available in 2.8L and 3.6L V6s or the 6L V8 (CTS-V), it offers a descent choice of engines and unlike the Lexus a manual transmission is available on all models. Unfortunately for enthusiasts though, the CTS-V (the one we really want) starts at $71,000. That is roughly $20,000 more than a BMW 335! GM needs to do a little better on that price but other than the CTS is an option to consider.

For now it seems the Germans still have the edge in luxury performance. Hopefully in a few years we’ll start to see a real push from other manufacturers to compete in this prestigious segment.

Discuss this article in the forums

Hybrid Cars

It has been almost twenty years since the Environment has been as important in the minds of North Americans as it is today. For many months now we’ve seen consistent and numerous news headlines regarding global warming. I think this is a good thing as it seems the planet is finally taking the subject seriously. I consider myself an environmentally conscious person and I always make the extra effort to recycle and conserve energy as much as possible. I just attended “Less Talk, More Action” the climate change conference that was held in downtown Montreal with speakers including Al Gore and David Suzuki and I fully support what they are trying to accomplish.

We hear of automakers are releasing more and more Hybrid models to accommodate the increasing demand to go green. I called a local Toyota dealership the other day and asked them how long the waiting list is for a Prius Hybrid. To my surprise the salesman told me about a week. I then called Honda to find out how long it would take to get a Civic Hybrid. Again, to my surprise, the wait was no more than two weeks.

So if these are all good things then why am I consistently frustrated after reading articles on Hybrid cars? While it may seem like the time of the Hybrid car is here I’m afraid I’m going to have to take exception to that argument.

I’m presently shopping for a late model vehicle as a second car and I’d absolutely love to get a Hybrid. I need something primarily get to car shows with the MontrealRacing.com kiosk stuffed in the back. A wagon or SUV would get the job done so what options do I have? I’m sorry to say not very many. At the time of this writing, a search on Hebdo found one Lexus RX400h for $53,000 and several Toyota Highlander Hybrids ranging from $35,000 to $55,000. Not exactly the best selection, especially since I was never crazy about the Highlander so let’s alter the search criteria. In fact, let’s get rid of the criteria altogether and assume I want to buy a new vehicle and I don’t care how much it costs. What can I get?

How about a BMW? No. Volkswagen? No. Mazda? Nothing. Chrysler? Same. Nissan must have a hybrid. Nope. In fact, the only automakers offering Hybrid vehicles in their showrooms at the moment are Honda (Civic, Accord), Toyota/Lexus (Prius, Camry, Highlander, GS450h, Rx400h) and Ford (Escape).

What about GM with the Saturn Vue Green Line and those Hybrid pickups? These vehicles managed to get hybrid classification but I cannot in good conscience call them hybrids. They are more like half-hybrids or hybrid wannabes. Their electric motors cannot drive the car like in a real hybrid. They only serve to shut off the motor when you are not pressing on the gas. The emissions are only reduced because less gas is consumed. How much less gas? The Silverado 4WD gets 14.3/11.3 L/100km. The non hybrid gets 17.0/13.1 L/100km. Yes, you read it correctly, a whopping savings of 2.7L/100km for city driving. That is truly pathetic when compared to the competition.

North America’s first Hybrid, the Honda Insight, was introduced way back in 1999 (production stopped last year.) In all fairness to GM I should point out that the Insight is also a half-hybrid but its 1L motor gets the best fuel economy out of any hybrid even today. I would have thought that other manufacturers would have been able to keep a similar pace but that has not been the case. GM attributes the delay to pursuing hydrogen technology first because it thought hybrids would only be a stepping stone toward the zero-emission hydrogen vehicles. Mercedes and VW are bringing more fuel efficient diesel powered cars to our shores as their answer to the green craze. The whole process is painstakingly slow. I don’t want to seem like a conspiracy nut or anything but I do suspect meddling from the oil industry. As long as there is gas to be refined I don’t think we will be seeing any viable alternatives that truly become mainstream. Hopefully I will be proved wrong.

With a selection of only eight Hybrid models being sold at thousands more than their non hybrid counterparts, it feels like we are being penalized for wanting to go green. When hybrids are being sold cheaper than regular cars and the pre-owned market has an ample supply of them, then I might say there is no reason not to own one and frown upon someone who opted for a gasoline model instead. Blame the manufacturers for dragging their feet on fuel efficiency.

On a side note, you may have read reports on former US Vice President Al Gore’s energy consumption at his Tennessee mansion. Gore’s home consumes more energy in a month then the average American household does in a year. The report was conveniently made public the day after Gore received an Oscar for his global warming documentary “An Inconvenient Truth”. Obviously the right wing neoconservatives do not like Gore’s recent surge in popularity. One can logically assume that the bigger the household, the more energy it will likely consume. Do they expect Gore (who came 527 votes away from being the leader of the free world) to move to a $150,000 condo? I sure don’t. Gore offsets his consumption by donating to a company which uses the money to invest in alternative energy anyways.

Gore’s carbon footprint is irrelevant to me. The benefits of his efforts of convincing the world of the impending doom far outweigh any cuts to his own carbon footprint might yield. In the end, the necessary changes to save the environment can only come from big business, not the individual consumer. This doesn’t mean being environmentally conscious is useless. Using your influence as a green consumer is what will force the economy in the right direction but it does mean that no matter how much we try to be individually, the problem won’t go away until our economy is based on non polluting industries.

Discuss this article in the forums

Mirror Position 2.0

I’d like to spend some time to discuss proper orientation of a vehicle’s side mirrors. Ultimately, the driver should of course do whatever he or she is most comfortable with but I’d like you to take into account some of the following suggestions.

Over the years I’ve noticed that most drivers position their side mirrors in a particular fashion whereby they can see down the side of the vehicle. I’m not sure where this concept first originated but whoever taught them to drive probably showed them that this was the correct way and it was never a question after that. While the position might seem good for parking, I cannot identify any other advantage to having the mirror placed in such a way.

Eleven years ago when I was learning to drive, my parents showed me how to adjust the mirrors so the side of the car was visible. I accepted this as the correct way because I didn’t know any better. On my first practical driving lesson, I promptly entered the car and began adjusting the mirrors. My instructor asked me why I wanted to see the side of the car through my mirror and I didn’t have an explanation. He then pointed out that by angling the mirror further away form the car, I could basically eliminate both blind spots altogether. Let’s call the new idea mirror position 2.0 (or MP2.0 for short).

Have you ever seen someone merging onto the highway while hunched over the steering wheel with their head turned around 180 degrees, trying to see behind them? Adjusting the mirrors to cover your blind spots will readily render this acrobatic movement obsolete. While it is still the law to glance to the side to check your blind spot while merging, MP2.0 allows you to know exactly what is in your blind spot so that when you glance over, you will not be surprised by an eighteen wheeler that decided not to let you in. Use MP2.0 for all lane changes and you’ll see just how handy it really is.

MP2.0 is very simple to implement. Find a large parking lot and located a vehicle that is all by itself somewhere. Position your vehicle in the spot right beside the other vehicle. Don’t park too close because highway lanes are wider than parking spaces. Use your judgment. Advance slowly until you can no longer see it in your rear-view mirror. Now simply adjust the side mirror outwards until the entire vehicle is visible. Repeat on the other side of your car. You now have MP2.0 installed on your vehicle. It might take some getting used to but believe me, once you notice the increased visibility you will wonder how you ever drove with the old version.

Voir la discussion a propos de l’article

How to begin modifying your vehicle

I often get emails from newcomers to the car scene who wish to start modifying their car. They ask very basic questions such as “How do I modify my car?” and “Is there a school or something I can go to for the tuning world?” To a person who has been modifying their car for years these questions might seem a bit silly but I’m sure many of us have wanted to start a new hobby and asked equally silly questions.

Before I say anything else I’d like to voice my dissatisfaction of the word “tuning”. Unfortunately this word has become mainstream to describe the aftermarket industry (probably due to the lack of viable alternatives.) The word stems from tuning an engine which means tweaking it to extract the best possible performance. Somehow it has been morphed to encompass non engine modifications such as tinted windows, fancy headlights and stickers but that is incorrect and it will always be incorrect. If you want to make yourself sound really inexperienced in the modified car scene then by all means use the word tuning. Otherwise, try to find alternatives such as “aftermarket” or “modified”. The other word that should never be used under any circumstance is “P-Flow” (unless of course you actually have a real Neuspeed P-Flow). P-Flow is the name Neuspeed gave to its line of performance air intake systems. Unless you paid the bucks for Neuspeed’s system you have an air intake and not a P-Flow.

Not that that’s out of the way we can discuss a little bit about how to start modifying your vehicle. People modify their rides to make them perform better, look better or simply to differentiate them from other vehicles. Because this is done according to a person’s taste people may argue there is no right or wrong. I’m going to put my foot down and squash that argument right now. There is definitely a right and a wrong if you want to command any sort of respect from anyone who knows anything in the aftermarket industry.

This is not to say any of the methods I mentioned above are wrong. Some people care the most about looks, others modify only for performance and some it’s a bit of both. There can be a lot of hating between the groups that hang out at the track trying to shave that extra .1 sec of the ¼ mile and the groups that just want a good looking car to cruise down the strip with. Whatever your flavor, try to be respectful that everyone has their own taste and like to do different things with their cars.

I have put together a few pointers on how to get started no matter what your goal is. You’ll thank me later on if you follow these tips. Let’s say you just bought a new car and its bone stock. Where do you start?

Suspension is what you want to modify first on your car. Without question it should come before any other esthetic and engine modifications. From a performance standpoint, going fast without improved handling is silly and dangerous. From a looks standpoint, having a car done up with a body kit, wheels, paintjob and spoiler that sites at stock height is simply ridiculous. Lowering the car a few inches may not give you that “wow” look from your friends right away but other modified car owners will always notice a lowered car and more importantly, they will notice its being done properly.

If your goal is performance, or better yet, to build a sleeper then you’ll probably want to start working on the motor. A sleeper is a vehicle that looks stock but is much faster than stock. It can be very amusing to see a Civic CX that looks like it was driven to the track by your grandmother blow the doors off a Corvette or some other fast car. Keep in mind however that the faster you make your car, the more important it is to have good brakes. For the safety of your self and others, make the necessary investment.

If your goal is looks, then the next thing after suspension should be wheels. Have you ever seen a car with the exterior all done up to the max, slammed to the ground with stock mages and hubcaps? It looks terrible so don’t do it. Be careful, however, because if you’ve lowered your car you have less clearance for larger wheels & tires. There is no real list of what fits and what doesn’t because there is simply too much variation in sizes. What you need to do is ask on an internet discussion forum what will fit. If this site can’t get you the answer, there are web sites for every single car make and model out there where you can ask real owners what they have and what fit.

After these two first steps are complete, you are ready to proceed in whichever area you please. Everyone has different tastes in what looks good and what doesn’t and if you like your car that is what matters most. However that being said, its very easy for newcomers to make their car look funny by modifying anything and everything just for the sake of having changed something. Stay away from this mentality because your car can end up looking tacky (or “riced” out) very quickly. If this concerns you then try to stay away from modifications like altezza taillights, re-badging your car to something it isn’t and neon lights, all of which are commonly ridiculed by enthusiasts.

One thing you’ll learn quickly is that modifying a car is very costly. It can get even more costly when you need to replace parts three or four times because you keep buying the cheap brand. Do yourself a favor and buy quality parts. OEM (original equipment manufacturer) parts that come from the automakers themselves are generally the best quality because they spent big amounts on R&D so buy them when you can. An OEM skirt kit will fit your vehicle perfectly compared to a less expensive fiberglass one that will need to be modified and cut even though it was made for your car. The only downside is that there usually isn’t a huge selection of OEM aftermarket parts and chances are other people have bought them too.

These are some very basic things to get you started modifying your car. Before any purchase you should always research as much as you can on what you are buying. With so much info at your fingertips it’s easy to learn quickly get into the scene in a responsible, respected and safe way.

Discuss this article in the forums

Next Page »