News: Motorcycle doing 300Km/h in Vancouver...crazy mofo

Pas mal dure de lui faire perdre des points d'inaptitudes, il semble très agile au volant de sa machine même s'il a laissé son cerveau à côté de sa lettre de suicide à la maison
 
Courageux, temeraire mais stupide...et a tout ceux qui dise quon devrais pas presenter ca sur le forum de mtlracing paske le monde vont essayer...ayoye reveillez-vous ya 3 millions de video de ca sur youtube suffit de demander et en passant, ca deja ete essayer, ya probablement un cave qui le fais presentement pis yen a probablement un qui n'auras jamais vue la video de ca vie mais mordu de vitesse qui va l'essayer, ya 10 ans quand jtai as trop sage et que jfesais du zigzag comme lui sur lautoroute, yen avais pas d'exemple de ca en video pis jler faite pareil, pas eu besoin de l'exemple, Avez-vous penser aux annonces publicitaires ou tu vois un kia sideways criss y devrais pas presenter ca le monde vont acheter ca pis faire du drift dans rue, c officiel.
 
logik23 said:
And fromage, to get a bike license here, you need to be able to ride around a parking lot, not race through traffic at 300kmh...
Click to expand...

no shit, but the tests are actually a lot harder(not saying much I know) than a drivers license.


and the parking lot test, actually, is more difficult than the road exam. :p
 
Ca me fait tellement rire de voir le monde basher le gars, jpense que personne va lui apprendre qu'il va surement mourir sur un bike. Respect
 
The only problem I saw in this video was the fucking idiots clogging the left lane forcing him to weave and filter. Hater gonna hate.

No harm no foul. Fuck this society that doesn't know up from down. As far as i see, 76 year old women are more dangerous. He hurt nobody but that old bag injured 10 people including an infant.
 
250Rocket said:
The only problem I saw in this video was the fucking idiots clogging the left lane forcing him to weave and filter. Hater gonna hate.

No harm no foul. Fuck this society that doesn't know up from down. As far as i see, 76 year old women are more dangerous. He hurt nobody but that old bag injured 10 people including an infant.
Click to expand...

I completely agree with this.

Obviously not implying that everyone should go out and do this, but he's conscious and able, and much less dangerous than people that are neither, such as the example above of the stereotypical old women.

Is it something he should have done? No. Is it something that was as dangerous as people are assuming in this thread? No. (dangerous yes, not as much so as some people think)
 
Adill said:
I completely agree with this.

Obviously not implying that everyone should go out and do this, but he's conscious and able, and much less dangerous than people that are neither, such as the example above of the stereotypical old women.

Is it something he should have done? No. Is it something that was as dangerous as people are assuming in this thread? No. (dangerous yes, not as much so as some people think)
Click to expand...

Pretty much.

The argument to use against people saying "he could have killed someone" is simple....You tell them "Every time you (the person you're arguing with) get in a car you might have an accident and kill somebody so you should go to jail if you get behind the wheel. You're potentially just as lethal as this guy doing 300."

What I'd propose is a system based on risks, not speeds. If you take a grandma and a race car driver driving at 100kph, the risks of injury are not the same. We allow the incapable person to do 100kph but the race car driver may be able to do 200 (within the given conditions) and be putting everybody else at equal risk but he'll have his car towed and the judge will laugh in his face. Of course we need standardized limits because we live in a society but on a case to case situation I don't see what's wrong with justifying why you deviated from the norm safely. If you didn't do it safely, well you pay the price.

At no time in the video did i see him 1) lose even the slightest control of the bike, 2) Put himself in a position where he would be cut off with no exit strategy and 3) do so on a machine that was operating outside it's designed capability.

You know using the brain goes a long way but in 2012 we've mostly become chanting, fear driven lemmings that follow societal norms blindly. Those of use watching the spectacle and questioning the stupidities are then attacked by said lemmings.

I love quote so I'll end this post with one.

It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
Click to expand...
 
250Rocket said:
At no time in the video did i see him 1) lose even the slightest control of the bike, 2) Put himself in a position where he would be cut off with no exit strategy and 3) do so on a machine that was operating outside it's designed capability.
Click to expand...

These two points exactly, he knew what he was doing, and was always in measure to get out of the way in case someone veered a bit (not that it really matters when you pass someone in less than a tenth of a second)

Pisses me off that a woman backed up into my parked car (last week) sans any form of impediment to her ability to drive on public roads, yet it's this guy that's considered as a danger on the road for knowing what he was doing.
 
If he hadn't posted it online like an idiot, he would have gotten away with it.

I agree that he did not hurt anyone and he seemed in control, but they can't let someone like this off the hook when it's so public.

Sadly, we need one set of rules for everyone and it's usually unfair to the more able because the rules are set for the less able.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top