Ukraine invasion thread. (ww3?)

Aussi je trouve que Putin s’achete du temps
Entre temps il nettoie Kursk, ensuite il reviendra avec encore plus de demandes
 
Kursk est une distraction pendant que l'Ukraine est en train de faire éclater les rafineries et bases militaires Russes. Kurst n'est pas le end-game, faut en revenir.

Pendant que la Russie envoit tout ce qu'elle a pour Kurst pour ce sauver la face, ils en perdent ailleur.
 
rebel said:
This is pretty repetitive now. Yeah they fucked up, yeah didn’t take 3-5 days. Yeah they lost a lot of soldiers
But all don’t matter much because here we are 3 years later

Ceasefire doesn’t provide anything to Russia, i don’t see why they would accept it for now

They need something else in return
Click to expand...
You don’t even care to modify the order of words when you speak in kremlin reps terms
It’s quite pathetic 🤣

En passant putin never came to Kursk, at least not this year

Proof is on the web
 
Juslav said:
Kursk est une distraction pendant que l'Ukraine est en train de faire éclater les rafineries et bases militaires Russes. Kurst n'est pas le end-game, faut en revenir.

Pendant que la Russie envoit tout ce qu'elle a pour Kurst pour ce sauver la face, ils en perdent ailleur.
Click to expand...

Faque l’Ukraine perd du terrain à Kursk contre des ânes pi des tracteur John Deere tiré par des trisomiques? Esti qui sont weak as fuck les Ukrainiens…
 
when rasha was "retreating to a more advantageous position" (😂) , while they were actually getting raped, ya'll lot didn't bat an eye
now that Ukraine is ACTUALLY retreating from Kursk close to Sudzja, as the task of taking over Pokrovsk via destabilization is successful, ya'll yelling how Ukrainians getting anal in Kursk.

😂😂😂(y)
 
Doesn’t really matter the opinion ls and propaganda. The fact that zelenaky stepped in first for ceasefire and putin has the luxury to drag it speaks volumes
 
rebel said:
Doesn’t really matter the opinion ls and propaganda. The fact that zelenaky stepped in first for ceasefire and putin has the luxury to drag it speaks volumes
Click to expand...
When Zelensky told trump to fuck off in the Oval Office you didn’t call that dragging
When it’s rasha you do
Your tune is so retardedly biased it’s crazy
Pathetic
After that these people call themselves « impartial »

Keep playing your selective tunes
 
android25ua said:
When Zelensky told trump to fuck off in the Oval Office you didn’t call that dragging
When it’s rasha you do
Your tune is so retardedly biased it’s crazy
Pathetic
After that these people call themselves « impartial »

Keep playing your selective tunes
Click to expand...
Several of us claimed zelensky made a mistake and he did as he came back with letter to apologize.
Z is in a bad spot he needs to hurry up to say yes to everything to continue getting support

You cannot be that blind not to see this
 
rebel said:
Several of us claimed zelensky made a mistake and he did as he came back with letter to apologize.
Z is in a bad spot he needs to hurry up to say yes to everything to continue getting support

You cannot be that blind not to see this
Click to expand...
There were no apologies in that letter
You useful idiots recite theories that it was apologetic
We already spoke about this
You need to catch up

You also skipped all the posts that demonstrate that it’s in USA best interest to continue support

« Blind » blames coming from someone like you with your track record here is beyond pathetic
 
Si on faisait la liste des politicos qui font des promesses largement exagéré on en aurait pour 1 mois…

"Le budget va se balancer tout seul…"
 
Rebel Android : your opinion on this please



The Secret Deal? How the U.S. May Have Helped Russia Recapture Kursk

Over the past several months, mounting evidence suggests that the Trump administration has played a decisive role in Russia’s recent military success in Kursk. What initially seemed like a shift in U.S. policy may, in fact, be part of a secret arrangement between Trump and Putin — an agreement that could fundamentally alter Ukraine’s future.

Trump’s Strategy: Weakening Ukraine at a Critical Moment

Half a year ago, I predicted that if Trump returned to power, his administration would:
1. Block Ukraine from joining NATO.
2. Cut off aid to Ukraine.
3. Force Ukraine to surrender territory to Russia by freezing the war along the front line.

The first two predictions have already come true, but the third presents a challenge — Putin refuses to freeze the war along the front line because doing so would mean losing part of Russia. To create conditions for “negotiations,” Trump had to ensure that Russia regained control of the Kursk region.

This was done in two critical steps:
• Cutting off military aid and intelligence sharing: At the worst possible moment — just as Russia launched a major counteroffensive in Kursk — Trump blocked crucial U.S. aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine. According to TIME magazine, this led to devastating losses, with “the worst losses in Kursk.”
• Compromising Ukrainian defenses: Ukrainian soldiers reported that Russian forces in Kursk “suddenly had extremely precise coordinates” of their positions, logistics hubs, and ammunition depots. This has fueled speculation that sensitive intelligence was leaked, possibly by Russia sympathizers within Trump’s administration.

A Modern-Day Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact?

As reports from the battlefield emerged, it became increasingly clear that Russia’s advantage in Kursk was not a coincidence. Ukrainian forces have since retreated, and Russian flags have been raised in the once-liberated city of Sudzha.

The timing of U.S. actions is highly suspicious:
• The U.S. only restored arms supplies and intelligence sharing after Ukraine’s retreat had begun.
• Ukrainian forces noted that Russian troops suddenly had near-perfect intelligence on Ukrainian positions, suggesting prior coordination.
• Foreign intelligence agencies, citing the Trump administration’s untrustworthiness, had already reduced cooperation with the U.S. (Politico).

Veteran and military strategist Robin Horsfall provided further insights into the battlefield dynamics:
• Ukraine’s occupation of Kursk was initially a diversion to weaken Russian forces in Donbas, tying down 30,000 Russian troops.
• Ukraine’s ability to hold Kursk was entirely dependent on U.S. intelligence, which allowed precise counterattacks.
• In February 2025, Russia increased its troop presence in Kursk to 50,000, preparing for a counteroffensive. However, their success depended on Ukraine losing intelligence support.

The Smoking Gun? A Prearranged Betrayal

Horsfall also shared an alarming revelation:
• On February 27, 2025 — before Trump’s public announcement — a Russian general in Kursk reportedly told a subordinate that they were waiting for Ukrainian surveillance to go down before launching their offensive.
• This information was relayed through an informal communication chain and eventually reached a trusted source in Eastern Europe.
If this timeline is accurate, it suggests that Russia knew Trump would cut off intelligence support before it happened.

What Comes Next?

The implications of this possible secret deal are enormous. Was Trump’s maneuver an act of deliberate sabotage, designed to force Ukraine into a U.S.-brokered ceasefire? If so, it is a clear betrayal — not only of Ukraine but of Europe’s security and democratic values.

While the evidence does not yet constitute direct proof, the growing patterns of U.S. actions and battlefield consequences demand serious scrutiny. Ukraine and its allies must urgently assess whether the U.S. administration can be trusted and take necessary steps to prevent further manipulation of its war effort.

The world deserves answers. And Ukraine deserves better.
 
SRT-What? said:
Rebel Android : your opinion on this please



The Secret Deal? How the U.S. May Have Helped Russia Recapture Kursk

Over the past several months, mounting evidence suggests that the Trump administration has played a decisive role in Russia’s recent military success in Kursk. What initially seemed like a shift in U.S. policy may, in fact, be part of a secret arrangement between Trump and Putin — an agreement that could fundamentally alter Ukraine’s future.

Trump’s Strategy: Weakening Ukraine at a Critical Moment

Half a year ago, I predicted that if Trump returned to power, his administration would:
1. Block Ukraine from joining NATO.
2. Cut off aid to Ukraine.
3. Force Ukraine to surrender territory to Russia by freezing the war along the front line.

The first two predictions have already come true, but the third presents a challenge — Putin refuses to freeze the war along the front line because doing so would mean losing part of Russia. To create conditions for “negotiations,” Trump had to ensure that Russia regained control of the Kursk region.

This was done in two critical steps:
• Cutting off military aid and intelligence sharing: At the worst possible moment — just as Russia launched a major counteroffensive in Kursk — Trump blocked crucial U.S. aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine. According to TIME magazine, this led to devastating losses, with “the worst losses in Kursk.”
• Compromising Ukrainian defenses: Ukrainian soldiers reported that Russian forces in Kursk “suddenly had extremely precise coordinates” of their positions, logistics hubs, and ammunition depots. This has fueled speculation that sensitive intelligence was leaked, possibly by Russia sympathizers within Trump’s administration.

A Modern-Day Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact?

As reports from the battlefield emerged, it became increasingly clear that Russia’s advantage in Kursk was not a coincidence. Ukrainian forces have since retreated, and Russian flags have been raised in the once-liberated city of Sudzha.

The timing of U.S. actions is highly suspicious:
• The U.S. only restored arms supplies and intelligence sharing after Ukraine’s retreat had begun.
• Ukrainian forces noted that Russian troops suddenly had near-perfect intelligence on Ukrainian positions, suggesting prior coordination.
• Foreign intelligence agencies, citing the Trump administration’s untrustworthiness, had already reduced cooperation with the U.S. (Politico).

Veteran and military strategist Robin Horsfall provided further insights into the battlefield dynamics:
• Ukraine’s occupation of Kursk was initially a diversion to weaken Russian forces in Donbas, tying down 30,000 Russian troops.
• Ukraine’s ability to hold Kursk was entirely dependent on U.S. intelligence, which allowed precise counterattacks.
• In February 2025, Russia increased its troop presence in Kursk to 50,000, preparing for a counteroffensive. However, their success depended on Ukraine losing intelligence support.

The Smoking Gun? A Prearranged Betrayal

Horsfall also shared an alarming revelation:
• On February 27, 2025 — before Trump’s public announcement — a Russian general in Kursk reportedly told a subordinate that they were waiting for Ukrainian surveillance to go down before launching their offensive.
• This information was relayed through an informal communication chain and eventually reached a trusted source in Eastern Europe.
If this timeline is accurate, it suggests that Russia knew Trump would cut off intelligence support before it happened.

What Comes Next?

The implications of this possible secret deal are enormous. Was Trump’s maneuver an act of deliberate sabotage, designed to force Ukraine into a U.S.-brokered ceasefire? If so, it is a clear betrayal — not only of Ukraine but of Europe’s security and democratic values.

While the evidence does not yet constitute direct proof, the growing patterns of U.S. actions and battlefield consequences demand serious scrutiny. Ukraine and its allies must urgently assess whether the U.S. administration can be trusted and take necessary steps to prevent further manipulation of its war effort.

The world deserves answers. And Ukraine deserves better.
Click to expand...
Not saying it’s impossible, but that means the oval office circus with zelesnky was also anticipated by trump administration because the cut off came right after the scandal at white house.
Maybe trump brought him
There to provoke him knowing zelenzky s ego could not let go and then shut off the intelligence and continue plan with putin. Seems maybe a tad far fetched but not impossible
 
SRT-What? said:
Rebel Android : your opinion on this please



The Secret Deal? How the U.S. May Have Helped Russia Recapture Kursk

Over the past several months, mounting evidence suggests that the Trump administration has played a decisive role in Russia’s recent military success in Kursk. What initially seemed like a shift in U.S. policy may, in fact, be part of a secret arrangement between Trump and Putin — an agreement that could fundamentally alter Ukraine’s future.

Trump’s Strategy: Weakening Ukraine at a Critical Moment

Half a year ago, I predicted that if Trump returned to power, his administration would:
1. Block Ukraine from joining NATO.
2. Cut off aid to Ukraine.
3. Force Ukraine to surrender territory to Russia by freezing the war along the front line.

The first two predictions have already come true, but the third presents a challenge — Putin refuses to freeze the war along the front line because doing so would mean losing part of Russia. To create conditions for “negotiations,” Trump had to ensure that Russia regained control of the Kursk region.

This was done in two critical steps:
• Cutting off military aid and intelligence sharing: At the worst possible moment — just as Russia launched a major counteroffensive in Kursk — Trump blocked crucial U.S. aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine. According to TIME magazine, this led to devastating losses, with “the worst losses in Kursk.”
• Compromising Ukrainian defenses: Ukrainian soldiers reported that Russian forces in Kursk “suddenly had extremely precise coordinates” of their positions, logistics hubs, and ammunition depots. This has fueled speculation that sensitive intelligence was leaked, possibly by Russia sympathizers within Trump’s administration.

A Modern-Day Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact?

As reports from the battlefield emerged, it became increasingly clear that Russia’s advantage in Kursk was not a coincidence. Ukrainian forces have since retreated, and Russian flags have been raised in the once-liberated city of Sudzha.

The timing of U.S. actions is highly suspicious:
• The U.S. only restored arms supplies and intelligence sharing after Ukraine’s retreat had begun.
• Ukrainian forces noted that Russian troops suddenly had near-perfect intelligence on Ukrainian positions, suggesting prior coordination.
• Foreign intelligence agencies, citing the Trump administration’s untrustworthiness, had already reduced cooperation with the U.S. (Politico).

Veteran and military strategist Robin Horsfall provided further insights into the battlefield dynamics:
• Ukraine’s occupation of Kursk was initially a diversion to weaken Russian forces in Donbas, tying down 30,000 Russian troops.
• Ukraine’s ability to hold Kursk was entirely dependent on U.S. intelligence, which allowed precise counterattacks.
• In February 2025, Russia increased its troop presence in Kursk to 50,000, preparing for a counteroffensive. However, their success depended on Ukraine losing intelligence support.

The Smoking Gun? A Prearranged Betrayal

Horsfall also shared an alarming revelation:
• On February 27, 2025 — before Trump’s public announcement — a Russian general in Kursk reportedly told a subordinate that they were waiting for Ukrainian surveillance to go down before launching their offensive.
• This information was relayed through an informal communication chain and eventually reached a trusted source in Eastern Europe.
If this timeline is accurate, it suggests that Russia knew Trump would cut off intelligence support before it happened.

What Comes Next?

The implications of this possible secret deal are enormous. Was Trump’s maneuver an act of deliberate sabotage, designed to force Ukraine into a U.S.-brokered ceasefire? If so, it is a clear betrayal — not only of Ukraine but of Europe’s security and democratic values.

While the evidence does not yet constitute direct proof, the growing patterns of U.S. actions and battlefield consequences demand serious scrutiny. Ukraine and its allies must urgently assess whether the U.S. administration can be trusted and take necessary steps to prevent further manipulation of its war effort.

The world deserves answers. And Ukraine deserves better.
Click to expand...
connais pas trop l'histoire de "secret deal" mais que trump allait jouer la flute de putin, c'était reporté ben avant qu'il soit élu
a date, pas mal toutes les predictions dans cette direction se sont réalisées

maintenant après que ses exercises d'essai de maltraitance et soumission dans l'oval office a backfire tellement que memes les reps inondent l'instagram avec "fuck you not my president", le backfire de "finir la guerre en 24h", plus ce qu'il est en train de faire avec son économie (rien a faire avec Ukraine), y'a pu rien qui va me surprendre

cependant, je crois que trump backtrack sur ses promesses de "24h" et full stop d'aide a l'Ukraine parce que:
- membres de son propre office lui disent comment que ca devient crissement evident qu'il joue la flute
- rasha constitue un danger universel a cette planète (incluant les États Unis... lol?)
- meme trump doit se rendre compte que rasha est maintenant plus a terre que jamais et c'est LE temps d'effacer toute sa capacité de continuer d'être un danger universel, et en meme temps ressortir comme president qui a vraiment fait ce qu'il a fallu pour garantir la paix a tout le monde, ce qui en meme temps pourrait (je dis bien pourrait lol) effacer/ou faire en sorte que le monde oublie quel osti de sans dessin de reputation trump s'est fait pendant son premier terme, et qu'il continue de faire maintenant
 
rebel said:
Not saying it’s impossible, but that means the oval office circus with zelesnky was also anticipated by trump administration because the cut off came right after the scandal at white house.
Maybe trump brought him
There to provoke him knowing zelenzky s ego could not let go and then shut off the intelligence and continue plan with putin. Seems maybe a tad far fetched but not impossible
Click to expand...

C'est écrit dans le ciel que c'était le seul et unique but de ce meeting, faire mirroiter à tout le monde un deal trop beau pour être vrai question de montrer sa bonne foi, pour finalement essayer de saboter le meeting (qui comme par hazard était live à la TV nationale) pour pouvoir dire à tout le monde "Regardez vous voyez bien que c'est Zelensky qui est pas parlable" et ainsi pouvoir se retirer en mettant la faute sur l'Ukraine.

Le problème c'est que Trump et l'autre clown sont tellement mauvais acteurs que c'est eux qui ont eu l'air de deux imbécile world wide, Trudeau aurait probablement mieux acté ca avec son BACC en art.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top