Israel Plans Nuclear Strike on Iran

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sandro_Bit

New member
this is the beginning of the end...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2535310,00.html

ISRAEL has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons.

Two Israeli air force squadrons are training to blow up an Iranian facility using low-yield nuclear “bunker-busters”, according to several Israeli military sources.

The attack would be the first with nuclear weapons since 1945, when the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Israeli weapons would each have a force equivalent to one-fifteenth of the Hiroshima bomb.

Under the plans, conventional laser-guided bombs would open “tunnels” into the targets. “Mini-nukes” would then immediately be fired into a plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce the risk of radioactive fallout.

“As soon as the green light is given, it will be one mission, one strike and the Iranian nuclear project will be demolished,” said one of the sources.

The plans, disclosed to The Sunday Times last week, have been prompted in part by the Israeli intelligence service Mossad’s assessment that Iran is on the verge of producing enough enriched uranium to make nuclear weapons within two years.

Israeli military commanders believe conventional strikes may no longer be enough to annihilate increasingly well-defended enrichment facilities. Several have been built beneath at least 70ft of concrete and rock. However, the nuclear-tipped bunker-busters would be used only if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United States declined to intervene, senior sources said.

Israeli and American officials have met several times to consider military action. Military analysts said the disclosure of the plans could be intended to put pressure on Tehran to halt enrichment, cajole America into action or soften up world opinion in advance of an Israeli attack.

Some analysts warned that Iranian retaliation for such a strike could range from disruption of oil supplies to the West to terrorist attacks against Jewish targets around the world.

Israel has identified three prime targets south of Tehran which are believed to be involved in Iran’s nuclear programme:

# Natanz, where thousands of centrifuges are being installed for uranium enrichment

# A uranium conversion facility near Isfahan where, according to a statement by an Iranian vice-president last week, 250 tons of gas for the enrichment process have been stored in tunnels

# A heavy water reactor at Arak, which may in future produce enough plutonium for a bomb

Israeli officials believe that destroying all three sites would delay Iran’s nuclear programme indefinitely and prevent them from having to live in fear of a “second Holocaust”.

The Israeli government has warned repeatedly that it will never allow nuclear weapons to be made in Iran, whose president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has declared that “Israel must be wiped off the map”.

Robert Gates, the new US defence secretary, has described military action against Iran as a “last resort”, leading Israeli officials to conclude that it will be left to them to strike.

Israeli pilots have flown to Gibraltar in recent weeks to train for the 2,000-mile round trip to the Iranian targets. Three possible routes have been mapped out, including one over Turkey.

Air force squadrons based at Hatzerim in the Negev desert and Tel Nof, south of Tel Aviv, have trained to use Israel’s tactical nuclear weapons on the mission. The preparations have been overseen by Major General Eliezer Shkedi, commander of the Israeli air force.

Sources close to the Pentagon said the United States was highly unlikely to give approval for tactical nuclear weapons to be used. One source said Israel would have to seek approval “after the event”, as it did when it crippled Iraq’s nuclear reactor at Osirak with airstrikes in 1981.

Scientists have calculated that although contamination from the bunker-busters could be limited, tons of radioactive uranium compounds would be released.

The Israelis believe that Iran’s retaliation would be constrained by fear of a second strike if it were to launch its Shehab-3 ballistic missiles at Israel.

However, American experts warned of repercussions, including widespread protests that could destabilise parts of the Islamic world friendly to the West.

Colonel Sam Gardiner, a Pentagon adviser, said Iran could try to close the Strait of Hormuz, the route for 20% of the world’s oil.

Some sources in Washington said they doubted if Israel would have the nerve to attack Iran. However, Dr Ephraim Sneh, the deputy Israeli defence minister, said last month: “The time is approaching when Israel and the international community will have to decide whether to take military action against Iran.”
 
yeah and they know this.... 2 squadrons will destroy the world... listen buddy, if there is going to be any nuclear weapons discharge, believe you me that nobody will know until it's on the ground and goes boom...
 
^^ for sure man, those 2 jets will go around the world dropping nukes. you're a winner for real *tu*. it's the after effects of this attack that will be the beginning of the end noob.
 
^^ for sure man, those 2 jets will go around the world dropping nukes. you're a winner for real *tu*. it's the after effects of this attack that will be the beginning of the end noob.

Not really, the area around the plants may be very contaminated, but other then that i dont think theres a risk of a nuclear cloud, unless the detonations happen above the surface, which wont happen, plus they are small tactical nukes, not a full blown ballistic missle.

They should just use MOAB.
 
^^ for sure man, those 2 jets will go around the world dropping nukes. you're a winner for real *tu*. it's the after effects of this attack that will be the beginning of the end noob.


lol

as long as the usa is the world police, theyre will be no "end". :D
 
sh*t man all this war for nothing. the only thing it does is spend billions just to kill ppl. its sad to see mankind will never get along.
 
If Israel doesn't want Iran to have nuclear weapons, they should disarm their own first...

i agree.

But with the amount of countries with nuclear capabilities rises, do you really think any country would leave itself defenseless?
 
I wouldn't read too much into it. If it were serious we wouldn't be reading about it. Furthermore there are plans for every contingency everywhere. The USA has plans to invade Canada for crying out loud. This is just some propaganda to get people talking.
 
and every one think that Iran is the biggest threat due to its uranium enrichment?? I wonder who is the real threat in this world and who is causing conflict and without any doubt can use its nuclear capability. Who is terrorising who now? Man if anything, this little country should be really whipped off the map. Cant wait to c Iran testing their first long range nuclear missiles.

Hold on a second, mind reminding us who ran his mouth on public televison claiming a particuliar country has to be "wiped off the map"? Could that possibly be Iran's batshit crazy president Mr Ahmadinejab?

You're right I dont see how his controversial statements could possibly be considered as at threat to israel's existence...

My point? Cut the bullshit, they're both just as bad.

Dont fool yourself, Iran as any self respecting millitary power, also has plans to deal with what they consider as threats

Hell, even the americans had secret war plans to invade canada in the 20th century...
 
Some coments were deleted.
If any members feel that any country doesn't deserve to be on this planet keep it to your self.

Please keep this civil.
 
I wouldn't read too much into it. If it were serious we wouldn't be reading about it. Furthermore there are plans for every contingency everywhere. The USA has plans to invade Canada for crying out loud. This is just some propaganda to get people talking.

I agree.
 
Just thought I'd mention it, this wouldn't be the first time Israel takes action to prevent a neighbouring country from acquiring nuclear weapons. In 1981 they conducted an air strike to cripple an Iraki nuclear station (osiriak) . Looks like history might be repeating itself...

And as far as the use of low yield nuclear weapons is concerned, this might be the only way to damage the iranian installations... If there's one thing the middle east learned in the first gulf war is that the American bunker buster bombs can be a real pain in the ass... their solution? dig deeper to render conventional weapons ineffective...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top