250Rocket
Well-known member
in any crime, the first question to solve is to understand who benefits from it.
qft.
in any crime, the first question to solve is to understand who benefits from it.
By that logic, the USA planned and started WW2, then?
By that logic, the USA planned and started WW2, then?
How did the USA benefit?
Really?
Going from rich, but strictly regional power to Nuclear Weapon-weilding Uberpower is not benefit enough for you?
I'm not commenting on whether or not people have facilitated the work of the hijakers that day. All I'm saying is that there is no "smoking gun" to show that the events on that day unfolded in a way that differs from the official story as it. Before & after, there might be fuckery involved... actually that is a given.
Never let a good crisis go to waste
- said every politician since forever...
BTW, the USA was already considered an international powerhouse game changer after defeating the Spanish Empire in Cuba and going full retards in the Philippines way before WW1...just sayin'.
What they held in 1939: the Philippines, and a bunch of Islands used by Pan-Am for Clipper refuelling. They had 2-3 carriers to project their force and a few obscolecent battleships. Powerhouse game changers... Maybe.
1945? Yeah, they had to World by the balls, and then some.
If it was, it was US commanded.
To this date, the only winner of the attacks is the US. How convenient.
In any crime, the first question to solve is to understand who benefits from it.
Yet, nobody did yet.
Must be kidding.
Lots talked, but were shutdown and looked like fools.
Very good witnesses had strange death after the events.
And you forget two main points:
1) When you are involved in something like this, you beleive in it. (Think of anyone serving a cause, they beleive in it).
2) For you to talk, the benefits must outweight the risk. (Benefit=being described as a clown/fool / risk=death)
Let's say I am a simple technician, paid to go and install explosives in the world trade centers, during the night or at strange times, how can you "believe" in what you're doing is remotely right?!? Even if you were paid, some people would still say something.
It's even crazier to think that the gov pays FBI or CIA agents to survey these people to make sure they don't slip... That's an almost impossible task.
I remember a few people that had came out and said they didn't believe but none were really "involved" in any of it and didn't really have much credibility. Do you have any "reliable" sources? I'd like to read some more on it.
Again, I started out not believing the original story but as time passed, I stopped. There are so many variables that I doubt someone could orchestrate something that big, but then again, I could be wrong.
I am really not sure of either. Right now I'm 50/50 because there are too many blurred facts, on both sides.
Let's say I am a simple technician, paid to go and install explosives in the world trade centers, during the night or at strange times, how can you "believe" in what you're doing is remotely right?!? Even if you were paid, some people would still say something.
It's even crazier to think that the gov pays FBI or CIA agents to survey these people to make sure they don't slip... That's an almost impossible task.
I remember a few people that had came out and said they didn't believe but none were really "involved" in any of it and didn't really have much credibility. Do you have any "reliable" sources? I'd like to read some more on it.
Again, I started out not believing the original story but as time passed, I stopped. There are so many variables that I doubt someone could orchestrate something that big, but then again, I could be wrong.
I am really not sure of either. Right now I'm 50/50 because there are too many blurred facts, on both sides.
Let's say I am a simple technician, paid to go and install explosives in the world trade centers, during the night or at strange times, how can you "believe" in what you're doing is remotely right?!? Even if you were paid, some people would still say something.
It's even crazier to think that the gov pays FBI or CIA agents to survey these people to make sure they don't slip... That's an almost impossible task.
I remember a few people that had came out and said they didn't believe but none were really "involved" in any of it and didn't really have much credibility. Do you have any "reliable" sources? I'd like to read some more on it.
Again, I started out not believing the original story but as time passed, I stopped. There are so many variables that I doubt someone could orchestrate something that big, but then again, I could be wrong.
I am really not sure of either. Right now I'm 50/50 because there are too many blurred facts, on both sides.
Other than the Pentagon "plane" the most ridiculous thing is that both towers fell. They were hit differently, yet both fell after almost the same time. This to me is probability almost zero for this to happen