theoutsider
New member
Je disais ca juste pour t'ecoeurer. Laches pas.
Hose qui color le gaz.
- Thread starter paradigmqc
- Start date
Je disais ca juste pour t'ecoeurer. Laches pas.
tipat91
New member
Y'é la ton problème, ces une Fuel Injection Hose. Sa te prend une Carburetor Hose
paradigmqc
Premium
what????????
bovi.prelude
Legacy Member
Contamination of fuel – the presence of something that’s not supposed to be there – accounts for more than half of fuel-related problems. This includes both things that came in “from the outside” – like microbes coming in and establishing a home in the fuel tank, as well as the fuel itself degrading and producing things (like asphaltenes) that normally wouldn’t be there, but which now contaminate the fuel.
With so much information floating around, we figured it might be good to do a quick
“down and dirty” summary of the symptoms that should lead you to suspect you’ve got a fuel contamination issue. Recognizing the problem and then correctly identifying the cause are the first two steps in resolving a fuel-related problem. You have to know what the problem is and what the cause is before you can apply a solution that will work.
Keep in mind that, while these fuel contamination symptoms indicate something with the fuel that isn’t supposed to be there, when it comes to knowing exactly what’s causing a particular symptom, some of these have more than one possible root cause.
Black smoke (or white or blue) – Smoke is composed to unburned petroleum particles. A properly-functioning engine will burn fuel completely without having smoke as a byproduct. If the engine is in proper working order, then the presence of smoke means there is now something in the fuel that shouldn’t be there. Something that isn’t burning completely. Identifying what that is will take a little more detective work, but the most common culprits some kind of heavier petroleum compounds, whether it’s sludge, asphaltenes or other fuel heavy ends, or even lube oil. None of those will burn cleanly like fresh fuel will.
Off-Color or “Smelly” fuel – fresh gasoline or diesel looks clear and bright, and should have a characteristic “solvent” smell. If the fuel starts to look cloudy, there could be entrained water in there. If it looks darkened, then its likely unstable and in process of having asphaltenes and heavy ends breaking out of it. If it smells funny, check for microbes, especially if you know there’s any significant amount of water in the tank.
Engine Runs Rough or Shuts Down – this mean something is present in the fuel that isn’t burning like it’s supposed to. Since we’re talking about contaminants, this precludes an issue like inadequate cetane rating of diesel fuel. But in terms of contaminants, you would consider the possibility of water (especially in a gas or marine engine) or heavy end substances. You should also check your filter because it’s possible the contaminants have restricted fuel flow through the filter to the point of the engine not getting enough run to run properly.
Any time your engines or equipment deviate noticeably in how they are performing, make sure the fuel you’re using is up to spec.
Application of the term troll is subjective. Some readers may characterize a post as trolling, while others may regard the same post as a legitimate contribution to the discussion, even if controversial. Like any pejorative term, it can be used as an ad hominem attack, suggesting a negative motivation.[6]
As noted in an OS News article titled "Why People Troll and How to Stop Them" (25 January 2012), "The traditional definition of trolling includes intent. That is, trolls purposely disrupt forums. This definition is too narrow. Whether someone intends to disrupt a thread or not, the results are the same if they do."[7][8] Others have addressed the same issue, e.g., Claire Hardaker, in her Ph.D. thesis[8] "Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions",[9] and Dr. Phil.[citation needed] Popular recognition of the existence (and prevalence) of non-deliberate, "accidental trolls", has been documented widely, in sources as diverse as Nicole Sullivan's keynote speech at the 2012 Fluent Conference, titled "Don't Feed the Trolls"[10] Gizmodo,[11] online opinions on the subject written by Silicon Valley executives[12] and comics.[13]
Regardless of the circumstances, controversial posts may attract a particularly strong response from those unfamiliar with the robust dialogue found in some online, rather than physical, communities. Experienced participants in online forums know that the most effective way to discourage a troll is usually to ignore it,[citation needed] because responding tends to encourage trolls to continue disruptive posts – hence the often-seen warning: "Please do not feed the trolls".
The "trollface" is an image occasionally used to indicate trolling in Internet culture.[14][15][16]
At times, the word can be abused to refer to anyone with controversial opinions they disagree with.[17] Such usages goes against the ordinary meaning of troll in multiple ways. Most importantly, trolls don't actually believe the controversial views they claim. Farhad Manjoo criticises this view, noting that if the person really is trolling, they are a lot more intelligent than their critics would believe.[17]
Origin and etymology
There are competing theories of where and when troll was first used in Internet slang, with numerous unattested accounts of BBS and UseNet origins in the early 1980s or before.
The English noun troll in the standard sense of ugly dwarf or giant dates to 1610 and comes from the Old Norse word troll meaning giant or demon.[18] The word evokes the trolls of Scandinavian folklore and children's tales: antisocial, quarrelsome and slow-witted creatures which make life difficult for travellers.[19][20]
In modern English usage, trolling may describe the fishing technique of slowly dragging a lure or baited hook from a moving boat[21] whereas trawling describes the generally commercial act of dragging a fishing net. Early non-Internet slang use of trolling can be found in the military: by 1972 the term trolling for MiGs was documented in use by US Navy pilots in Vietnam. It referred to use of "...decoys, with the mission of drawing...fire away..."[22]
The contemporary use of the term is alleged to have appeared on the Internet in the late 1980s,[23][24] but the earliest known attestation according to the Oxford English Dictionary is in 1992.[25][26][27]
The context of the quote cited in the Oxford English Dictionary[26] sets the origin in Usenet in the early 1990s as in the phrase "trolling for newbies", as used in alt.folklore.urban (AFU).[28][29] Commonly, what is meant is a relatively gentle inside joke by veteran users, presenting questions or topics that had been so overdone that only a new user would respond to them earnestly. For example, a veteran of the group might make a post on the common misconception that glass flows over time. Long-time readers would both recognize the poster's name and know that the topic had been discussed a lot, but new subscribers to the group would not realize, and would thus respond. These types of trolls served as a practice to identify group insiders. This definition of trolling, considerably narrower than the modern understanding of the term, was considered a positive contribution.[28][30] One of the most notorious AFU trollers, David Mikkelson,[28] went on to create the urban folklore website Snopes.com.
By the late 1990s, alt.folklore.urban had such heavy traffic and participation that trolling of this sort was frowned upon. Others expanded the term to include the practice of playing a seriously misinformed or deluded user, even in newsgroups where one was not a regular; these were often attempts at humor rather than provocation. The noun troll usually referred to an act of trolling—or to the resulting discussion—rather than to the author, though some posts punned on the dual meaning of troll
With so much information floating around, we figured it might be good to do a quick
“down and dirty” summary of the symptoms that should lead you to suspect you’ve got a fuel contamination issue. Recognizing the problem and then correctly identifying the cause are the first two steps in resolving a fuel-related problem. You have to know what the problem is and what the cause is before you can apply a solution that will work.
Keep in mind that, while these fuel contamination symptoms indicate something with the fuel that isn’t supposed to be there, when it comes to knowing exactly what’s causing a particular symptom, some of these have more than one possible root cause.
Black smoke (or white or blue) – Smoke is composed to unburned petroleum particles. A properly-functioning engine will burn fuel completely without having smoke as a byproduct. If the engine is in proper working order, then the presence of smoke means there is now something in the fuel that shouldn’t be there. Something that isn’t burning completely. Identifying what that is will take a little more detective work, but the most common culprits some kind of heavier petroleum compounds, whether it’s sludge, asphaltenes or other fuel heavy ends, or even lube oil. None of those will burn cleanly like fresh fuel will.
Off-Color or “Smelly” fuel – fresh gasoline or diesel looks clear and bright, and should have a characteristic “solvent” smell. If the fuel starts to look cloudy, there could be entrained water in there. If it looks darkened, then its likely unstable and in process of having asphaltenes and heavy ends breaking out of it. If it smells funny, check for microbes, especially if you know there’s any significant amount of water in the tank.
Engine Runs Rough or Shuts Down – this mean something is present in the fuel that isn’t burning like it’s supposed to. Since we’re talking about contaminants, this precludes an issue like inadequate cetane rating of diesel fuel. But in terms of contaminants, you would consider the possibility of water (especially in a gas or marine engine) or heavy end substances. You should also check your filter because it’s possible the contaminants have restricted fuel flow through the filter to the point of the engine not getting enough run to run properly.
Any time your engines or equipment deviate noticeably in how they are performing, make sure the fuel you’re using is up to spec.
Application of the term troll is subjective. Some readers may characterize a post as trolling, while others may regard the same post as a legitimate contribution to the discussion, even if controversial. Like any pejorative term, it can be used as an ad hominem attack, suggesting a negative motivation.[6]
As noted in an OS News article titled "Why People Troll and How to Stop Them" (25 January 2012), "The traditional definition of trolling includes intent. That is, trolls purposely disrupt forums. This definition is too narrow. Whether someone intends to disrupt a thread or not, the results are the same if they do."[7][8] Others have addressed the same issue, e.g., Claire Hardaker, in her Ph.D. thesis[8] "Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions",[9] and Dr. Phil.[citation needed] Popular recognition of the existence (and prevalence) of non-deliberate, "accidental trolls", has been documented widely, in sources as diverse as Nicole Sullivan's keynote speech at the 2012 Fluent Conference, titled "Don't Feed the Trolls"[10] Gizmodo,[11] online opinions on the subject written by Silicon Valley executives[12] and comics.[13]
Regardless of the circumstances, controversial posts may attract a particularly strong response from those unfamiliar with the robust dialogue found in some online, rather than physical, communities. Experienced participants in online forums know that the most effective way to discourage a troll is usually to ignore it,[citation needed] because responding tends to encourage trolls to continue disruptive posts – hence the often-seen warning: "Please do not feed the trolls".
The "trollface" is an image occasionally used to indicate trolling in Internet culture.[14][15][16]
At times, the word can be abused to refer to anyone with controversial opinions they disagree with.[17] Such usages goes against the ordinary meaning of troll in multiple ways. Most importantly, trolls don't actually believe the controversial views they claim. Farhad Manjoo criticises this view, noting that if the person really is trolling, they are a lot more intelligent than their critics would believe.[17]
Origin and etymology
There are competing theories of where and when troll was first used in Internet slang, with numerous unattested accounts of BBS and UseNet origins in the early 1980s or before.
The English noun troll in the standard sense of ugly dwarf or giant dates to 1610 and comes from the Old Norse word troll meaning giant or demon.[18] The word evokes the trolls of Scandinavian folklore and children's tales: antisocial, quarrelsome and slow-witted creatures which make life difficult for travellers.[19][20]
In modern English usage, trolling may describe the fishing technique of slowly dragging a lure or baited hook from a moving boat[21] whereas trawling describes the generally commercial act of dragging a fishing net. Early non-Internet slang use of trolling can be found in the military: by 1972 the term trolling for MiGs was documented in use by US Navy pilots in Vietnam. It referred to use of "...decoys, with the mission of drawing...fire away..."[22]
The contemporary use of the term is alleged to have appeared on the Internet in the late 1980s,[23][24] but the earliest known attestation according to the Oxford English Dictionary is in 1992.[25][26][27]
The context of the quote cited in the Oxford English Dictionary[26] sets the origin in Usenet in the early 1990s as in the phrase "trolling for newbies", as used in alt.folklore.urban (AFU).[28][29] Commonly, what is meant is a relatively gentle inside joke by veteran users, presenting questions or topics that had been so overdone that only a new user would respond to them earnestly. For example, a veteran of the group might make a post on the common misconception that glass flows over time. Long-time readers would both recognize the poster's name and know that the topic had been discussed a lot, but new subscribers to the group would not realize, and would thus respond. These types of trolls served as a practice to identify group insiders. This definition of trolling, considerably narrower than the modern understanding of the term, was considered a positive contribution.[28][30] One of the most notorious AFU trollers, David Mikkelson,[28] went on to create the urban folklore website Snopes.com.
By the late 1990s, alt.folklore.urban had such heavy traffic and participation that trolling of this sort was frowned upon. Others expanded the term to include the practice of playing a seriously misinformed or deluded user, even in newsgroups where one was not a regular; these were often attempts at humor rather than provocation. The noun troll usually referred to an act of trolling—or to the resulting discussion—rather than to the author, though some posts punned on the dual meaning of troll
ThermalAce
New member
This, c'est la ligne de ton système de NOS, si tu spray jamais, l'essence est au repos dans la ligne dédier pour le systeme de jus et il prend de l'age.
paradigmqc
Premium
Le gaz du carbu est au repos depuis 2 mois pis il sort TOUJOURS blanc.
paradigmqc
Premium
Jle sais Alex !
paradigmqc
Premium
Bin tabarnak!!! Je viens d'aller voir si c'est bien de la top quality. Bon non c'est la marque : Atlas.
American Muscle
Legacy Member
Fait pareil attention l'essence d'aujourd'hui est très corrosive pour les carburateurs du à l’éthanol. Ca fait la même réaction que de l'aluminium avec du calcium. Le revêtement protecteur plaqué se décompose en croûtes et l'aluminium en dessous pourris et fait de la poudre blanche. Il existe des additif pour prévenir ca que David Freiburger expliquait. Je suis passé par la j'ai du remplacer 2 bol, holley est au courant du problème.
paradigmqc
Premium
Je parle du systeme de gaz du carbu, et non du carb en lui même.
Le carb va etres rebuilder cet hivers et discarté hivers 2017.
paradigmqc
Premium
J'ai fait 3 test hier et j'en fait un autre ce soir.
-> 5 litres de gaz dans un 5 galons = Ca sortis orange un peu et le reste bien blanc.
-> 30ML de gaz dans un contenant = AUCUN dépot, le gaz est toujours blanc ce matin.
-> Gaz dans un bout de hose = gaz ORANGE (C'est la 2ième fois que jefais ce test)
Ce soir, je vais vérifier la même hose mais avec du gaz + stabilisateur de gaz dedans, voir si ça changerais quelque chose.
Le gaz sort TOUJOURS blanc du système de carb.
C,est sur le bord de :
-Unwrap la ligne de gaz de NOS (C'est du wrap autocollant au kevlar)
-Arrache tout cte hose la
-Buy proper fuel line.
Ça retarde le reste!
-> 5 litres de gaz dans un 5 galons = Ca sortis orange un peu et le reste bien blanc.
-> 30ML de gaz dans un contenant = AUCUN dépot, le gaz est toujours blanc ce matin.
-> Gaz dans un bout de hose = gaz ORANGE (C'est la 2ième fois que jefais ce test)
Ce soir, je vais vérifier la même hose mais avec du gaz + stabilisateur de gaz dedans, voir si ça changerais quelque chose.
Le gaz sort TOUJOURS blanc du système de carb.
C,est sur le bord de :
-Unwrap la ligne de gaz de NOS (C'est du wrap autocollant au kevlar)
-Arrache tout cte hose la
-Buy proper fuel line.
Ça retarde le reste!
paradigmqc
Premium
Bon je viens de parler a un de mes chum. Avec la hose Atlas vendu chez NAPA. même trouble. LULZ Il mettent de l'huile din hose pour pas qui seche (tk un genre d'huile)
Ya faite passer du gaz et ça disparru.
Bin TABARNAK est bonne.
Ya faite passer du gaz et ça disparru.
Bin TABARNAK est bonne.
ThermalAce
New member
paradigmqc
Premium
ca revient à:
T'as pas sprayed pour faire virer ton 225
Ca reviens a ça.
Fuel pressure a 3lbs, tu aurais pas shooter non plus. C'est régler. Chu rassurer.
Coudon je peux tu juste avoir le droit de vérifier, contre vérifier et re-re-re vérifier ?