Donald John Trump is no longer president: what does it mean for you?

Brust said:
Peux tu apporter des preuves concrètes du "Trump Legal Team" qu’ils ont soumis à la Cour (je ne veux rien savoir des théories du complot qu’il bullshit au public), mais des vrais preuves d’irrégularités / fraudes électorales qui ont eu gain de cause à la Cour et qui viendrait ultimement changer le résultat de l’élection?
Click to expand...

Can you provide concrete evidence from the "Trump Legal Team" that they submitted to the Court (I don't want to know anything about the conspiracy theories he bullshits to the public), but real evidence of electoral irregularities / fraud that have won in court and who would ultimately change the outcome of the election?

If the English translation is correct.

If you want to know what they submitted to the court then read it yourself, it's literally online for anyone to read and the court will decide if it's enough evidence or not.
 
CRNKY said:
Can you provide concrete evidence from the "Trump Legal Team" that they submitted to the Court (I don't want to know anything about the conspiracy theories he bullshits to the public), but real evidence of electoral irregularities / fraud that have won in court and who would ultimately change the outcome of the election?

If the English translation is correct.

If you want to know what they submitted to the court then read it yourself, it's literally online for anyone to read and the court will decide if it's enough evidence or not.
Click to expand...

Merci de confirmer mon point. Donc aucune preuve n’a été apporter. En PA, Giuliani est arrivé au juge et a dit "it’s not a fraud claim"... Il a gagné une seule cause en fait. Il a gagné en PA que l’observateur peut être à 6 pied du scrutateur à la place de 10 pieds. Big deal!

Il a fait un autre claim comme quoi il n’y avait pas d’observateur dans le bureau de comptage.

Judge: Were they any GOP observer?

Giuliani: They were non-zero number of observer.

Judge: What’s a non-zero number?

Giuliani: They were observer there.

Judge: Ok..................

Je t’ai poser la question, mais je connais déjà la réponse. Je voulais te laisser une chance d’amener de la substance, mais tel que prévu tu en es incapable, car il n’y a pas de preuve.

Tu peux brailler tant que tu veux, mais le 20 janvier 2021 à 12:00 c’est Joe Biden qui va être assermenté. Aucune fraude électoral. BTW, il a été démontré que si Trump n’avais pas dit à répétition que le mail-in ballot est unsafe et frauduleux, il aurait gagné la Géorgie sans problème. Mais Trump étant un serial bungler, il a une nouvelle fois démontré qu’il est un maître dans l’art de tout chier.
 
You guys are hilarious with your arguments pretending to be the almighty decider of the truth and what will happen with the circus in the US. Keep arguing like it matters, I'll sit back and wait it out what happens in the US. Either way it goes will change nothing in my life, unless cheetos wins this, then I'll be laughing my ass off for real. So you guys just keep going at it like it actually matters, whatever gets you through the day. If cheetos wins this I'll come back only to post "LMAO" and leave. So have fun!
 
CRNKY said:
You guys are hilarious with your arguments pretending to be the almighty decider of the truth and what will happen with the circus in the US. Keep arguing like it matters, I'll sit back and wait it out what happens in the US. Either way it goes will change nothing in my life, unless cheetos wins this, then I'll be laughing my ass off for real. So you guys just keep going at it like it actually matters, whatever gets you through the day. If cheetos wins this I'll come back only to post "LMAO" and leave. So have fun!
Click to expand...

Bro, get laid or something. No one is asking you to come into this thread.
 
CRNKY said:
You guys are hilarious with your arguments pretending to be the almighty decider of the truth and what will happen with the circus in the US. Keep arguing like it matters, I'll sit back and wait it out what happens in the US. Either way it goes will change nothing in my life, unless cheetos wins this, then I'll be laughing my ass off for real. So you guys just keep going at it like it actually matters, whatever gets you through the day. If cheetos wins this I'll come back only to post "LMAO" and leave. So have fun!
Click to expand...

What this means:

I tried arguing but got demolished so I dont want to play anymore.
 
CRNKY said:
You guys are hilarious with your arguments pretending to be the almighty decider of the truth and what will happen with the circus in the US. Keep arguing like it matters, I'll sit back and wait it out what happens in the US. Either way it goes will change nothing in my life, unless cheetos wins this, then I'll be laughing my ass off for real. So you guys just keep going at it like it actually matters, whatever gets you through the day. If cheetos wins this I'll come back only to post "LMAO" and leave. So have fun!
Click to expand...

La dernière chose que tu as prouvé c’est que tu t’en calisse, car tu ne cesse de revenir poster. Le monde se fout de ta gueule parce que tu penses que le système démocratique est aussi corrompu que celui du Turkménistan, mais malgré tout tu continu de croire l’idiot à Giuliani qui se fait pogner les culottes baisser dans un trailer de Borat et qui fait des press conference au Four Season Total Landscaping à côté d’un Crématorium et Sex Shop. Rendu là je ne sais pas si c’est de la naïveté de ta part ou purement de l’imbécilité.

Ce que dit Leaky Giuliani en press conference et ce qu’il dit sous serment devant un juge c’est le contraire et 2 choses totalement différentes... Je vais continuer à croire ce qui se dit à la Cour because Evidence matters and feelings / allegations without evidence don’t matters.
 
CRNKY said:
You guys are hilarious with your arguments pretending to be the almighty decider of the truth and what will happen with the circus in the US. Keep arguing like it matters, I'll sit back and wait it out what happens in the US. Either way it goes will change nothing in my life, unless cheetos wins this, then I'll be laughing my ass off for real. So you guys just keep going at it like it actually matters, whatever gets you through the day. If cheetos wins this I'll come back only to post "LMAO" and leave. So have fun!
Click to expand...

Ooh. The dramatic Internet Exit Stage Right strategy.

Because nothing screams "look at me you miscreants, I'm well adjusted and I'll be leaving now" like a farewell post!

It's the internet. People are free to come and go. We're all willing participants here. We'll be right there with you laughing if Trump stages a coup that gains any sort of acceptance. But he's lost the elections.

Take care!
 
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/11/21/...smisses-trump-pennsylvania-lawsuit/index.html

(CNN) A US District Court judge Saturday dismissed a lawsuit by the Trump campaign trying to invalidate millions of Pennsylvania mail-in votes in a significant loss for the campaign.

Though the case was always extremely unlikely to succeed, President Donald Trump's backers and legal team -- and particularly his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani -- had pinned their hopes on the federal judge in Pennsylvania giving some credibility to their suspicions of fraud and entertaining Trump's attempt to overturn the popular vote for President-elect Joe Biden.

But Judge Matthew Brann, a longtime and well-known Republican in Pennsylvania, refused.


RELATED: CNN's live results from the presidential election

This was essentially the last major case seeking to throw out or block enough votes that could swing a key state in Trump's favor, and Brann's decision on Saturday is the 30th loss or withdrawal of a case from the Trump campaign and its allies since Election Day. There have only been two wins in court, about very small numbers of votes.

"Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated," US District Court Judge Matthew Brann wrote Saturday.

Brann went on to admonish the Trump campaign lawyers for not presenting factual proof for seeking to invalidate so many votes in the key battleground state.

What to know about Monday's Michigan State Board meeting to certify election results
What to know about Monday's Michigan State Board meeting to certify election results
"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," Brann added. "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."

"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more," the judge wrote." At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."

The counties in the state are scheduled to certify their election results on Monday.

The judge said any further consideration of this issue "would unduly delay resolution of the issues" regarding certification.[\QUOTE]
30ème défaite à la Cour pour Trump contre 2 maigres victoires qui n’ont eu que peu d’incidence sur le vote. Trump is such a loser...
Click to expand...
 
Officiel, il vient d’abdiquer et engage le processus vers la Transition Biden.


Lui pis ses gros show de boucanes...
 
Jeremi01 said:
As-tu des larmes de crocodile?
Click to expand...

Lol the media were besides themselves saying Trump was attempting a fascist takeover of the United States by not conceding the election. More laughably dumb hysteria from them.

Screenshot_20201123-192353_Chrome.jpg

I see he failed to condemn white supremacy in this tweet as well.
 
Il se cherchait juste une porte de sortie et il ne voulait pas paraître comme un loser . Il a fait son show pour dire qu’il contestait sa défaite pendant qu’il faisait des rounds de golf. Ses disciples pensaient dur comme fer que c’était vrai et c’est ça qui l’importait.


Where the fuck is Giuliani?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top