Donald John Trump is no longer president: what does it mean for you?

250Rocket said:
Another thing to think about. What if Trump contests the key states and recounts being under a much higher level of scrutiny provide him the overall win.

If people think we're "bad" by pointing out all the inconsistencies, just wait for the zero proof cries of Reeeee coming from the other side. If it does, and it might not, I have a feeling the reactions will be better than if Trump just won outright.

Again, I'm not getting bent out of shape at this point, or probably any point for that matter, just chilling watching the battle of narratives, trying to help people see the other side the main stream will never cover. It's like trying to watch a show with half the screen covered.
Click to expand...

You're amplifying a flawed, self-serving partisan narrative in the name of critical thinking. Spraying FUDD is not a public service.

When someone losing his mind over a bunch of jeeps in a video starts trending, you know the digging has just about hit rock bottom. That or "look, more people voted than were initially registered. Same day registration is a thing in 21 states."
 
lol... how the fuck can someone answer those phony requests when you are talking about hundreds of thousands of ballots already packed back in sealed boxes.

This is a smoke show...
 
250Rocket said:
Yeah except debunking is not like the school yard where you just have to say it's not true and that is that. Pointing to circular articles all referencing each other is not any better.

Just take the Sharpie article. The article itself says nothing conclusif. It however concluded with some very pertinent questions. Until those are answered, it's not a closed case just because the article says it "likely" did not affect it.
Click to expand...

You completely missed the point of the Sharpie article. The claim was that voting bulletins would be invalidated because voters were handed out sharpies. The article contained the response from the government officials saying that no bulletins would be rejected because of the type of pen used. That was the part where the voter fraud claims were debunked.
 
kahos said:
You're amplifying a flawed, self-serving partisan narrative in the name of critical thinking. Spraying FUDD is not a public service.

When someone losing his mind over a bunch of jeeps in a video starts trending, you know the digging has just about hit rock bottom. That or "look, more people voted than were initially registered. Same day registration is a thing in 21 states."
Click to expand...

Exactly, it appears that Americans are just now discovering how their electoral system actually works.

And boy do they have a lot of questions.
 
SebGHST said:
Citer Fox News comme source pour discréditer un autre article. Ça cest cringe..Comme si Fox était le messie. Depuis 20 ans ils racontent de la marde.

Ils censurent des discours presidentiel, comment etre plus impartial que ça?
Click to expand...

Le biais pro-républicain de Fox News est connu depuis des années. Si un site pro-Trump va confirmer que l'histoire des votes rejetés à cause des sharpies est fausse, personne ne pourra les accuser de dire des mensonges pro démocrates.
 
Donald John Trump is now president: what does it mean for you?

250Rocket said:
When they talk about counting "all" votes.

https://youtu.be/fS6xOuhsiJw
Click to expand...
250Rocket
giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
SebGHST said:
Citer Fox News comme source pour discréditer un autre article. Ça cest cringe..Comme si Fox était le messie. Depuis 20 ans ils racontent de la marde.

Ils censurent des discours presidentiel, comment etre plus impartial que ça?
Click to expand...

Well that's exactly the point!

Fox c'est le mégaphone de Trump, mais c'est rendu tellement ridicule qu'ils doivent debunker ses conspirations électorales.

That's saying something.


Patriots of Arizona, put your dentures on, call your hot cousins and rest easy, your sharpie votes will count.
 
Spaceman Spiff said:
You completely missed the point of the Sharpie article. The claim was that voting bulletins would be invalidated because voters were handed out sharpies. The article contained the response from the government officials saying that no bulletins would be rejected because of the type of pen used. That was the part where the voter fraud claims were debunked.
Click to expand...

But by the very fact of them bringing attention to the matter forced the establishment to insure that all votes would be counted. Now that it's done there no way other than theorizing what would have happened if attention wasn't brought to it. You can't say they would or wouldn't have been counted, however now that Sharpiegate did happen, the outcome is certain, no votes will be lost. Success.

There's one tag line from a major outlet, Democracy dies in darkness. So by their standards, shouldn't we be shinning light on anything and everything we can, even if it ends up being nothing? The more "nothing" we find, the more it goes to show that things are working properly. Instead the proposal is, let's not look because it's probably nothing.
 
250Rocket said:
But by the very fact of them bringing attention to the matter forced the establishment to insure that all votes would be counted. Now that it's done there no way other than theorizing what would have happened if attention wasn't brought to it. You can't say they would or wouldn't have been counted, however now that Sharpiegate did happen, the outcome is certain, no votes will be lost. Success.

There's one tag line from a major outlet, Democracy dies in darkness. So by their standards, shouldn't we be shinning light on anything and everything we can, even if it ends up being nothing? The more "nothing" we find, the more it goes to show that things are working properly. Instead the proposal is, let's not look because it's probably nothing.
Click to expand...

Yes, except "count all the votes" doesn't sound to be the republican rallying cry right now. More like "stop the count". You can't have it both ways is the thing.
You got to pick a lane and their overall strategy has been voter suppression.

There's a nuance between vigilance and throwing everything at the wall and see what stick for the sake of casting shade.

This is merely the end of an era. The one in which the rural vote could be relied on to give the less popular party the best outcome.

Billions is a great show. Why did you bring it up earlier?
 
ThePapi said:
Well that's exactly the point!

Fox c'est le mégaphone de Trump, mais c'est rendu tellement ridicule qu'ils doivent debunker ses conspirations électorales.

That's saying something.


Patriots of Arizona, put your dentures on, call your hot cousins and rest easy, your sharpie votes will count.
Click to expand...

Fox was at one point the gold standard for Republican news but that ship has sailed. Anybody not blind saw it on the walls when the liberal commentators like Chris Wallace started to move in but they're definitely no longer Trump's network when they we're the first to call Arizona for Biden.

This election is doing one thing, it's waking people up to the illusionary veneer that is cast over anything establishment/authoritative. Die hard Fox fans, something I've been accused of but never was, are waking up to the fact that even they are being feed fake news, just a smaller dose so that they could create a false left right distinction.
 
Officiellement,

Ça bat pas mal tous les SWJ de 2016 après la victoire de Trump.


Get ready
.
.
.
.


















Voici la conseillère spirituelle de Trump Paula White

 
250Rocket said:
But by the very fact of them bringing attention to the matter forced the establishment to insure that all votes would be counted. Now that it's done there no way other than theorizing what would have happened if attention wasn't brought to it. You can't say they would or wouldn't have been counted, however now that Sharpiegate did happen, the outcome is certain, no votes will be lost. Success.

There's one tag line from a major outlet, Democracy dies in darkness. So by their standards, shouldn't we be shinning light on anything and everything we can, even if it ends up being nothing? The more "nothing" we find, the more it goes to show that things are working properly. Instead the proposal is, let's not look because it's probably nothing.
Click to expand...
Sharpie votes have been counted in every election ever without the need for whistle blowing.

The only reason why this was an issue is the delay. If there was no Covid there wouldn't have been record mail-in, so there wouldn't have been a couple days of nothing during which people are free to speculate and raise a bunch of non-issues because of their desperation.

The delay in vote count is like a slow death for Trump, they're going down screaming and kicking.

If the election had been a landslide on either side we would be talking about protests right now, not sharpies.
 
250Rocket said:
But by the very fact of them bringing attention to the matter forced the establishment to insure that all votes would be counted. Now that it's done there no way other than theorizing what would have happened if attention wasn't brought to it. You can't say they would or wouldn't have been counted, however now that Sharpiegate did happen, the outcome is certain, no votes will be lost. Success.

There's one tag line from a major outlet, Democracy dies in darkness. So by their standards, shouldn't we be shinning light on anything and everything we can, even if it ends up being nothing? The more "nothing" we find, the more it goes to show that things are working properly. Instead the proposal is, let's not look because it's probably nothing.
Click to expand...

Unless you can provide a proof that procedures had to be changed, you are the one theorizing that the establishment had been forced to do anything.
I have nothing against shining a light on apparent irregularities but people who do that without bothering with a follow-up and leave the fact-checking to others are assholes that like to waste everybody's time because they are too ignorant of how their own political system actually works.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top