Donald John Trump is no longer president: what does it mean for you?

Republican officials behind a lawsuit alleging poll workers "incorrectly rejected" votes cast in person on Election Day will make their case in front of a Maricopa County Superior Court judge later this week.

The defendants — Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, Maricopa County Recorder Adrian Fontes and the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors — also will have a chance to produce evidence and make oral arguments, according to Judge Daniel Kiley.

But it appears unlikely the case would affect the outcome of the presidential vote. A lawyer for the county said fewer than 200 ballots are at issue.

President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign filed the lawsuit Saturday, alongside the Republican National Committee and the Arizona Republican Party. The complaint claims Maricopa County poll workers disregarded procedures designed to give voters a chance to correct ballot mistakes, possibly affecting final vote counts.

Its central claim involves “overvotes,” which happen when voters mark more options than allowed in a particular race. Because stray markings and other irregularities can cause Maricopa County tabulation machines to perceive an overvote, the tabulators are programmed to alert voters when that happens.

A voter then has two choices: “Spoil” the ballot and request a replacement, or cast the original ballot with the warning that overvotes may not be counted.


The lawsuit says voters who choose to proceed with their original ballots are entitled to a manual inspection of their ballots later and contends some poll workers urged voters to cast their ballots without further review. It calls for officials to identify and inspect Election Day ballots from Maricopa County that contain apparent "irregularities in connection with the voter’s selection of a candidate."


In a preliminary hearing held Monday, Roopali Desai, an attorney representing the Secretary of State’s Office, described the lawsuit as “an effort to find a problem when one does not exist.”

She noted the Republican Party had set up a website to solicit affidavits from voters or poll workers — undermining, she said, “the entire process and the very hard work of the many many people who are administering the election … and the voters themselves” — and argued the relief sought by the Trump campaign may not be possible under state law.

Thomas Liddy, representing Maricopa County, said the plaintiffs had offered “very little evidence” to support the idea of a systematic problem. Noting the lawsuit's claim that thousands of Trump votes could go uncounted, he countered: “Under that theory, you’d also see thousands of votes for the Democratic candidate” going uncounted.

“There were 155,860 votes voted in person on Election Day (in Maricopa County),” Liddy continued. “Of those, the tabulator only identified 180 potential overvotes on the presidential line … 180, that’s it.”

And he said it would be “absurd” to assume that all 180 were incorrectly deemed overvotes.

“There is no possibility of systematic error with only 180 out of 155,860,” he said.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2020/11/09/arizona-election-results-maricopa-county-challenge-involves-180-ballots/6229767002/
 
C'est pas mal exactement ca que je dis, je dis pas que Trump est coupable ou pas, je dis juste qu'ils ont fuckall sur lui dans l'affaire Mueller et que ce qu'ils ont est rien d'autre que du stock libre à l'interprétation, chose qu'un juge objectif va noyer assez vite et c'est la raison pourquoi personne va aller niaiser en cours avec ca.

Je sais très bien que Stormy Daniels c'est une histoire complètement différente lol, je mélange rien je fais simplement dire que l'affaire Mueller n'était rien d'autre qu'une tentative de plus pour atteindre sa réputation dans la même sauce que Stormy, pas une vendetta personnelle pour aller attaquer le personnage une fois son mandat terminé...

Au pire on peut régler ca avec un bet? :bigup:

500$, toi et Brust pour l'idée que Trump va se faire poursuivre personnellement pour l'affaire Mueller, on sécurise l'argent dans une plateforme faite pour ca et je vous donne 12 mois sinon c'est moi qui gagne? Vous avez l'air confiant c'est du free money pour vous! Hey mon ami c'est un deal pour toi mon ami :bigup:

Mon ami Rodrigo Mexicano peut bidder avec toi et les fonds iront pour l’organisme charitatif "Built the wall" gérer par Steve Bannon.
 
C'est pas mal exactement ca que je dis, je dis pas que Trump est coupable ou pas, je dis juste qu'ils ont fuckall sur lui dans l'affaire Mueller et que ce qu'ils ont est rien d'autre que du stock libre à l'interprétation, chose qu'un juge objectif va noyer assez vite et c'est la raison pourquoi personne va aller niaiser en cours avec ca.

Je sais très bien que Stormy Daniels c'est une histoire complètement différente lol, je mélange rien je fais simplement dire que l'affaire Mueller n'était rien d'autre qu'une tentative de plus pour atteindre sa réputation dans la même sauce que Stormy, pas une vendetta personnelle pour aller attaquer le personnage une fois son mandat terminé...

Au pire on peut régler ca avec un bet? :bigup:

500$, toi et Brust pour l'idée que Trump va se faire poursuivre personnellement pour l'affaire Mueller, on sécurise l'argent dans une plateforme faite pour ca et je vous donne 12 mois sinon c'est moi qui gagne? Vous avez l'air confiant c'est du free money pour vous! Hey mon ami c'est un deal pour toi mon ami :bigup:

Pauvre Mueller. Il a passer deux ans a enqueter ce que tu as dismiss après quoi, 5 min de survol de résumé d'un résumé caviardé?

Sert a rien d'avoir des juges non plus quand sans même avoir pris connaissance de l'entiereté de la preuve ni d'avoir entendu de témoins t'as décidé que que c'est pratiquement impossible d'en arriver a une conclusion autre que "pas de crime" et "not true".

Enquêteur aguerri on the record vs opinion internet... hmmm. Le crime et l'intérêt du public de proceder ou non, c'est deux choses et ce ne sont pas toutes les décisions qui sont prises pour les bonnes raisons.

C'est bien gentil l'offre du paris, mais c'est pas mon genre. +1 pour le showmanship, mais ça aucun lien avec les faits.
 
The mainstream media in one shot

EmezEvjXYAAnRFh
 
Looks more like a list of GOP brown nosers and yes-men. But have it your way!

Biden character assassination good. GOP shaming bad.

Bad media!
 
Scott Adams brought up an interesting point.

Most people claim that if they had a time machine they'd go back and kill/stop Hitler.

The media has brainwashed people so badly that we hear things like "Trump is literally Hitler".

So now we have an election and you have the opportunity to stop "Hitler 2.0" by committing voter fraud. Wouldn't most people in this position feel no remorse about stuffing a few extra ballots?

Also has there been any significant glitches/issues that have swung Trump's direction. If it's genuinely error and not fraud, you'd think it goes both ways.

Just some food for thought for anyone who hasn't rotted their brains out with the "fast food and candy" that is the MSM.
 
Just some food for thought for anyone who hasn't rotted their brains out with the "fast food and candy" that is the MSM.

Things that are bad for your brain:
-Mainstream Media.
Higher education ( because liberal)

Things that are good for your brain:
-The bible
-QAnon
-Bannon and the "chosen few" commentators

Suit yourself!

Surely the WaPo and Business Insider are what made Grim go coco for cocoa puffs!

Are you on parler yet? liaising with the conservative elites, away from the cesspool that is the general internet?
 
Last edited:
Scott Adams brought up an interesting point.

Most people claim that if they had a time machine they'd go back and kill/stop Hitler.

The media has brainwashed people so badly that we hear things like "Trump is literally Hitler".

So now we have an election and you have the opportunity to stop "Hitler 2.0" by committing voter fraud. Wouldn't most people in this position feel no remorse about stuffing a few extra ballots?

Also has there been any significant glitches/issues that have swung Trump's direction. If it's genuinely error and not fraud, you'd think it goes both ways.

Just some food for thought for anyone who hasn't rotted their brains out with the "fast food and candy" that is the MSM.

Yet the fervor you are describing is just as true for Trump supporters... why would it be only one way?
 
Scott Adams brought up an interesting point.

Most people claim that if they had a time machine they'd go back and kill/stop Hitler.

Who? What person completely unprompted would just claim: "Tell you what if I had a time machine I'd go back in time and kill Hitler"
The media has brainwashed people so badly that we hear things like "Trump is literally Hitler".

and running around the campaign trail screaming at the top of your lungs that the DNC is literally communist Cuba is different how?

So now we have an election and you have the opportunity to stop "Hitler 2.0" by committing voter fraud. Wouldn't most people in this position feel no remorse about stuffing a few extra ballots?

How many assumptions did you have even go through to get to this "thought" experiment"

Just some food for thought for anyone who hasn't rotted their brains out with the "fast food and candy" that is the MSM.

MSM is bad, but stringing together a bunch of fabricated, unrelated, and fictitious talking points is making use of critical thinking right?

Fascinating the length people will go to construct an alternate reality all in the name of "floating ideas". Just like how russian trolls are just "floating" tweets out there.
 
Scott Adams brought up an interesting point.

Most people claim that if they had a time machine they'd go back and kill/stop Hitler.

The media has brainwashed people so badly that we hear things like "Trump is literally Hitler".

So now we have an election and you have the opportunity to stop "Hitler 2.0" by committing voter fraud. Wouldn't most people in this position feel no remorse about stuffing a few extra ballots?

Also has there been any significant glitches/issues that have swung Trump's direction. If it's genuinely error and not fraud, you'd think it goes both ways.

Just some food for thought for anyone who hasn't rotted their brains out with the "fast food and candy" that is the MSM.
Nothing starts a good argument like invoking the nazis. Someone should create an expression to describe that.

So if some people would be willing to stop Hitler 2.0 by committing voter fraud, wouldn't there also be people stuffing extra ballots because they think Trump is the Messiah? The Trump lovers are just as irrational as the Trump haters.

How do you know there haven't been glitches/issues that swung in Trump's direction? It's not like you would believe any story that says so.
 
The Republicans are hard at work packing the top positions with Trump yes men. It's also not just Trump refusing the result, Pence isn't either.

Pentagon has confirmed the exits of Anderson (policy head), Kernan (intel head) and Stewart (Chief of Staff to SecDef).

Replacements: Anthony Tata, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, Kash Patel.
 
The Republicans are hard at work packing the top positions with Trump yes men. It's also not just Trump refusing the result, Pence isn't either.

To what end though?

Pompeo is also refusing to acknowledge Biden won. What's the strategy? Filling every senior position that they can in government institutions with Trump loyalist so that come inauguration day the "institution" refuse to turn over?

I guess if they actually literally refuse to leave, and have every single decision-making position giving direct orders to that effect you'd need a massive revolt amongst the civil service.

I'd start worrying if they start removing Generals
 
To what end though?

Pompeo is also refusing to acknowledge Biden won. What's the strategy? Filling every senior position that they can in government institutions with Trump loyalist so that come inauguration day the "institution" refuse to turn over?

I guess if they actually literally refuse to leave, and have every single decision-making position giving direct orders to that effect you'd need a massive revolt amongst the civil service.

I'd start worrying if they start removing Generals

Trump basically "Orwelled" the fuck out of the idea of a possible "coup d'etat" by claiming one was going on against his government when actually, it was always only about him as a president so never an actual "coup". The Democrats NEVER said anything about the Republican's claim to power. Now, are the Republicans/Trumpist preparing a real one while the population has been numbed to the idea?

If Republicans are bluffing about their intent to overturn this election, then their poker face is on fucking point right now:

Die-hard Trump loyalists rushed into top positions at the Pentagon: https://twitter.com/AaronMehta/status/1326282583613779968

Pence's message to Senate Republicans "I want to keep serving with you (as president of the Senate), and I think I will": https://twitter.com/anniekarni/status/1326269336143716352

Attorney General and CIA Director visit Mitch McConnell's office today: https://twitter.com/mmcauliff/status/1326282030112501760

Georgia Republican elected officials pressuring GA Secretary of State: https://twitter.com/stphnfwlr/status/1326270295641104386

White House tells federal agencies to proceed with plans for Trump’s February budget: https://twitter.com/damianpaletta/status/1326247037348814850

White House Presidential Personnel Office is spreading the word throughout the administration that if it hears of anyone looking for another job they will be fired:

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1325870591619035138

Mike Pompeo about the "smooth transition" to a second term

[video]https://www.c-span.org/video/?477982-1/secretary-pompeo-there-smooth-transition-trump-administration[/video]

Secretary Pompeo: "There Will Be a Smooth Transition to a Second Trump Administration"

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo responds to questions from reporters about the department's plans for transition to a new Biden-Harris administration. Secretary Pompeo begins by saying that "There will be a smooth transition to a second Trump administration," before going on to say that he knows the world is watching, that every legal vote must be counted and that any vote that was not lawfully cast should be rejected. "There's going to be a smooth transition. We're in good shape," he says
 
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-...an-for-the-nations-political-economic-divide/

Most notably, the stark economic rift that Brookings Metro documented after Donald Trump’s shocking 2016 victory has grown even wider. In 2016, we wrote that the 2,584 counties that Trump won generated just 36% of the country’s economic output, whereas the 472 counties Hillary Clinton carried equated to almost two-thirds of the nation’s aggregate economy.

A similar analysis for last week’s election shows these trends continuing, albeit with a different political outcome. This time, Biden’s winning base in 477 counties encompasses fully 70% of America’s economic activity, while Trump’s losing base of 2,497 counties represents just 29% of the economy.

Got to love how America's poorer people are being sold a bill of goods... So in spite of the actual election results, the poorer / lesser educated people want to keep ol' Donald around? So he can give Wall Street another tax break?


https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...tent=referral&utmTerm=topbar&referrer=twitter

But the filing cites only two specific instances of potential voter fraud, Adam Klasfeld reported for Law & Crime. Both are in counties that voted heavily for President Donald Trump.
Trump's big brain plan to win the election? using examples of so called fraud in counties that ultimately voted for him. Imagine how much more of a winner he would've been in those very counties if it wasn't for these meddling no-gooders.
 
J’aimerais vraiment que Trump refuse de quitter et que ça finisse en escorte physique par les forces policières pour le sortir physiquement de la WH. Se serait epic, télévisé live la, du bonbon!
giphy.gif

giphy.gif
 
Back
Top