Donald John Trump is no longer president: what does it mean for you?

Donald John Trump is now president: what does it mean for you?

HeavyMetal said:
Il y a deux villes où une grosse concentration de casinos aux USA: Atlantic City et Las Vegas.

La compétition des maisons de jeu est forte dans ces 2villes. Pour se diversifier, les casinos sont aussi devenus des salles de spectacles et des arènes de sport de combats. T'as la meilleure venue de la ville, tu attires + de monde.

Voilà, je te l'ai expliqué.
Click to expand...

Ok, donc tous ceux qui veulent ouvrir un casino à Atlantic City ou Vegas vont faire faillite s’ils utilisent ce modèle puisque la compétition y est trop forte?

Ça n’explique pas pourquoi spécifiquement Trump à fait faillite avec ses casinos.

Voici ce que je veux dire quand c’est un epic fail. Tout ce qu’il touche finit par perdre de l’argent.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/12/nyregion/donald-trump-atlantic-city.amp.html
 
Last edited:
Brust said:
Ok, on peut aussi bien demander à toute la population canadienne qu’est-ce qu’ils ont accompli parce qu’il n’en n’a pas eu un qui a réussi à se faire élire président des USA, donc ton point ne vaut pas grand chose. Il n’est pas question de moi ou toi, il est question de Trump qui prétend être un businessman à succès. Pour une raison inexpliqué le monde ne comprennent pas que le dude est un échec total ayant fait faillite à 6 reprises avec l’héritage de Fred Trump qui lui a monté une entreprise (Trump Organization) de rien. Tout le mérite revient à Fred Trump, pas à little Donnie.

Le gars est tellement un mauvais payeur, tellement fait faillite souvent qu’il doit se tourner vers des banques étrangère (Deutsche Bank) pour avoir du cash parce que les banques américaine ne veulent rien savoir de lui. S’il est aussi riche qu’il le prétend, il ne devrait pas payé uniquement que 750$ d’impôt en 2016. Donc soit il est riche, mais c’est un putain d’escroc qui fait de l’évasion fiscal, ou bien il n’est pas riche, mais plûtot surendetté.

Il n’y a pas d’autre option.

https://www.thoughtco.com/donald-trump-business-bankruptcies-4152019

Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Actually if you read that boring article further than the headline which was crafted to make you think something while explaining it half way through to clarify what happened.

"Each time, he requested an extension to file his 1040; and each time, he made the required payment to the I.R.S. for income taxes he might owe — $1 million for 2016 and $4.2 million for 2017. But virtually all of that liability was washed away when he eventually filed, and most of the payments were rolled forward to cover potential taxes in future years. To cancel out the tax bills, Mr. Trump made use of $9.7 million in business investment credits, at least some of which related to his renovation of the Old Post Office hotel, which qualified for a historic-preservation tax break. Although he had more than enough credits to owe no taxes at all, his accountants appear to have carved out an allowance for a small tax liability for both 2016 and 2017.

When they got to line 56, the one for income taxes due, the amount was the same each year: $750."

LONG-CONCEALED RECORDS SHOW TRUMP’S CHRONIC LOSSES AND YEARS OF TAX AVOIDANCE

Trump Paid $750 in Federal Income Taxes in 2017. Here’s the Math.

Reading beyond the headlines is your friend, that's where the truth comes out after they hooked you with some crazy headlines. Sometimes I think that they expect people not to read further than the headlines as it confirm what they already believe anyway.
 
I think his wealth is purposefully hard to assess but there's no arguing that he's wealthier than most. He's not the worst businessman, not the best either. It's like he made it his life's missions to find all the loopholes in the tax code. To the point where some of his schemes are hardly ethical. The fact a New York Mogul had to go overseas for his financing vs going with Jp Morgan or Goldman Sachs is not proof of anything in itself, but is surprising nonetheless.

Who cares though, wealth as a measure of a man is flawed.

Just like Trump, who has been described as the "most flawed" person Gen Kelly ever met.
"The depths of his dishonesty is just astounding to me. The dishonesty, the transactional nature of every relationship, though it's more pathetic than anything else. He is the most flawed person I have ever met in my life," Kelly has told friends, the outlet reported.
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/5...mp-the-most-flawed-person-hes-ever-met-report

If he's so great at business, why hasthere been such turnover within his administration? Turnover isn't exactly the kind of record you're supposed to go after.

Why are so many of his former associates/appointees talking trash about him? Why are so many former generals so vocal about his poor performance as potus?

You guys hate the left / democrats so much that your assessment of this guy's performance is not grounded in reality. It's all partisanship.
I'm unaffiliated. I was glad he won. He did not meet expectations. He picked fights with longstanding allies and courted whackjob dictators. That's a no go in my books.
 
Brust said:
Ok, donc tous ceux qui veulent ouvrir un casino à Atlantic City ou Vegas vont faire faillite s’ils utilisent ce modèle puisque la compétition y est trop forte?

Ça n’explique pas pourquoi spécifiquement Trump à fait faillite avec ses casinos.

Voici ce que je veux dire quand c’est un epic fail. Tout ce qu’il touche finit par perdre de l’argent.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/12/nyregion/donald-trump-atlantic-city.amp.html
Click to expand...

Les casinos sont des oligopoles dans ces 2villes: un casino y survit parce que les autres casinos le veulent bien.

T'es un propriétaire de casino là-bas et tu ne marches pas dans la clique, bien c'est la clique qui te rejette et tu crèves.

Prends des cours d'économie, stp.
 
HeavyMetal said:
Les casinos sont des oligopoles dans ces 2villes: un casino y survit parce que les autres casinos le veulent bien.

T'es un propriétaire de casino là-bas et tu ne marches pas dans la clique, bien c'est la clique qui te rejette et tu crèves.

Prends des cours d'économie, stp.
Click to expand...

Pas besoin de prendre des cours. Toi vas lire l’article tu vas voir comment il a fail alors que tout les autres casinos autour de lui faisait du profit à par le Trump Taj Mahal.


Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
 
kahos said:
I think his wealth is purposefully hard to assess but there's no arguing that he's wealthier than most. He's not the worst businessman, not the best either. It's like he made it his life's missions to find all the loopholes in the tax code. To the point where some of his schemes are hardly ethical. The fact a New York Mogul had to go overseas for his financing vs going with Jp Morgan or Goldman Sachs is not proof of anything in itself, but is surprising nonetheless.

Who cares though, wealth as a measure of a man is flawed.

Just like Trump, who has been described as the "most flawed" person Gen Kelly ever met.
"The depths of his dishonesty is just astounding to me. The dishonesty, the transactional nature of every relationship, though it's more pathetic than anything else. He is the most flawed person I have ever met in my life," Kelly has told friends, the outlet reported.
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/5...mp-the-most-flawed-person-hes-ever-met-report

If he's so great at business, why hasthere been such turnover within his administration? Turnover isn't exactly the kind of record you're supposed to go after.

Why are so many of his former associates/appointees talking trash about him? Why are so many former generals so vocal about his poor performance as potus?

You guys hate the left / democrats so much that your assessment of this guy's performance is not grounded in reality. It's all partisanship.
I'm unaffiliated. I was glad he won. He did not meet expectations. He picked fights with longstanding allies and courted whackjob dictators. That's a no go in my books.
Click to expand...

That last paragraph though.
 
Brust said:
Pas besoin de prendre des cours. Toi vas lire l’article tu vas voir comment il a fail alors que tout les autres casinos autour de lui faisait du profit à par le Trump Taj Mahal.


Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Heille, check ben ça.

Je m'en calisse. :)

La vie de Trump et dont il gère ses casinos me passent 6pieds au-dessus de la tête. :)
 
HeavyMetal said:
Heille, check ben ça.

Je m'en calisse. :)

La vie de Trump et dont il gère ses casinos me passent 6pieds au-dessus de la tête. :)
Click to expand...

Le monde qui s’en calisse ne prennent pas 2 minutes de leur temps à répondre à des sujets qui s’en calisse. Tu es pathétique tu dis une chose et te contredit en faisant l’inverse. Retournes voir ta belle-mère elle cherche la remote de ta TV.


Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
 
Eke895iWAAAgLfU
 
kahos said:
I think his wealth is purposefully hard to assess but there's no arguing that he's wealthier than most. He's not the worst businessman, not the best either. It's like he made it his life's missions to find all the loopholes in the tax code. To the point where some of his schemes are hardly ethical. The fact a New York Mogul had to go overseas for his financing vs going with Jp Morgan or Goldman Sachs is not proof of anything in itself, but is surprising nonetheless.

Who cares though, wealth as a measure of a man is flawed.

Just like Trump, who has been described as the "most flawed" person Gen Kelly ever met.
"The depths of his dishonesty is just astounding to me. The dishonesty, the transactional nature of every relationship, though it's more pathetic than anything else. He is the most flawed person I have ever met in my life," Kelly has told friends, the outlet reported.
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/5...mp-the-most-flawed-person-hes-ever-met-report

If he's so great at business, why hasthere been such turnover within his administration? Turnover isn't exactly the kind of record you're supposed to go after.

Why are so many of his former associates/appointees talking trash about him? Why are so many former generals so vocal about his poor performance as potus?

You guys hate the left / democrats so much that your assessment of this guy's performance is not grounded in reality. It's all partisanship.
I'm unaffiliated. I was glad he won. He did not meet expectations. He picked fights with longstanding allies and courted whackjob dictators. That's a no go in my books.
Click to expand...

Very well put, that's exactly how I feel about this... To add after he won, I really thought, as many others, that he would wind down the crazyness, but he went full retard... it's a shame though, he COULD had made a difference and push things in the right direction, he had that opportunity I think... doesn't mean everything he did is complete crap(economy seemed going well at least short term), but overall kind of yeah...
 
Tse dans le fond ils ont le choix entre 2 estis de crosseurs. Ils peuvent juste choisir par qui ils aiment mieux se faire fourrer. Jamais le monde en dehors des riches vont bénéficier de quoi que ce soit avec ces 2 partis la. Pi sont pris avec les 2 lol. C’est retardé comme système politique.
 
KerplunK said:
Tse dans le fond ils ont le choix entre 2 estis de crosseurs. Ils peuvent juste choisir par qui ils aiment mieux se faire fourrer. Jamais le monde en dehors des riches vont bénéficier de quoi que ce soit avec ces 2 partis la. Pi sont pris avec les 2 lol. C’est retardé comme système politique.
Click to expand...

Ouais, c'est pas mal ça. Et avec le collège électoral et le senat, on est pas mal loin de 1 personne / 1 vote.

Les petits états ruraux/ peu populeux sont sur-representés au sénat. C'est une idée folle de pensée que chaque État dois avoir le meme nombre de senateurs, peu importe son poids économie ou démographique. Californie 39 millions d'habitants. 2 Senateurs Démocrates. Wyoming? 580 000 habitants. 2 senateurs Républicains.

Ça te donne un système ou la chambre des représentants et le senat ont des composition différentes et ça fini en bras de fer partisan sur a peu près toutes. Les fly over states ont garder Donald au pouvoir. C'était son get out of jail free card pour le impeachment. Une majorité qui représente une minorité de population.


Les deux partis le savent, mais le but ultime c'est de garder leur influence, le status quo, pas de réinventer la roue. Alors ils cater a leur base respectives:

Dems: Jeunes, Urbains, Immigrants, syndicats. On vends de l'espoir.
Republicains: religieux, vieux, col bleus, wall street. On vends de la nostalgie / de la peur.

Dans les deux cas big business, les lobbyistes et les politiciens de carrière finissent par primer sur les intérêts des voteurs.

J'suis vraiment surpris qu'on est pas vu débarquer un "ennemi commun" pour palier au divide politique. C'est le prochain step si c'est pour virer a marde pour vrai.
 
Le système politique Américain à été concu pour que les changements soient difficiles. La raison est de prévenir qu'un fou furieux comme Hitler arrive et foute la merde. En revanche, c'est difficile de changer quoi que soit de facon significative et rapide.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top