Donald John Trump is no longer president: what does it mean for you?

This is reason why a 'Trump' is needed to deal with bullies.

The Trump administration on Wednesday announced a sharp break from U.S. trade policy, vowing it may ignore certain rulings by the World Trade Organization if those decisions infringe on U.S. sovereignty.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...gnore-wto-in-major-shift-of-u-s-trade-policy/

Does't sound like he truly cares about the WTO...

Sending some garbage letter telling Erdogan "Don't be a tough guy". That's how you deal with bullies, ladies and gentleman!
Sucks that Erdogan threw it in the garbage...
Sounds pretty bad to me when some are saying that Turkey "Owned" the U.S over syria.

Through a series of power moves Erdogan has outmaneuvered Trump, highlighting the dwindling power of the US in the Middle East.
https://www.businessinsider.com/tur...tayyip-erdogan-power-control-decisive-2019-10

Sounds like the "Art of the Deal" needs a new chapter pretty badly.
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...gnore-wto-in-major-shift-of-u-s-trade-policy/

Does't sound like he truly cares about the WTO...

Sending some garbage letter telling Erdogan "Don't be a tough guy". That's how you deal with bullies, ladies and gentleman!
Sucks that Erdogan threw it in the garbage...
Sounds pretty bad to me when some are saying that Turkey "Owned" the U.S over syria.

https://www.businessinsider.com/tur...tayyip-erdogan-power-control-decisive-2019-10

Sounds like the "Art of the Deal" needs a new chapter pretty badly.

Trump cares about the WTO as much as China does. You ever heard of intellectual property rights? Currency manipulation?
If Turkey was so tough, why didn't they invade while the US soldiers were still present? OWNED US, lol. You want to own them, attack the us soldiers while they are heading to IRAQ.
 
Trump cares about the WTO as much as China does. You ever heard of intellectual property rights? Currency manipulation?
If Turkey was so tough, why didn't they invade while the US soldiers were still present? OWNED US, lol. You want to own them, attack the us soldiers while they are heading to IRAQ.

They sort of did actually. The US basically needed to ask turkey for a cease fire so it wouldn't be caught in the crossfire as it GTFOs

Turkey already had the upper hand. They had nothing to gain and everything to lose by risking NATO on NATO confrontation. They played this one quite well.

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
 
They sort of did actually. The US basically needed to ask turkey for a cease fire so it wouldn't be caught in the crossfire as it GTFOs

Turkey already had the upper hand. They had nothing to gain and everything to lose by risking NATO on NATO confrontation. They played this one quite well.

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk

So they OWNED nothing. Somali's killed a couple US soldiers and dragged the bodies behind a truck. That my friend, is owning the US. As savage as it is.
 
So they OWNED nothing. Somali's killed a couple US soldiers and dragged the bodies behind a truck. That my friend, is owning the US. As savage as it is.
Wait, your definition is ownage limits itself to uniformed casualties? The turks got free rein to a large chunk of a foreign country by getting the US to turn their back on a regional ally. And what did the US have to show for in return? Nada. Heck, turkey is even buying Russian hardware these days. That's a signicant loas...

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
 
Wait, your definition is ownage limits itself to uniformed casualties? The turks got free rein to a large chunk of a foreign country by getting the US to turn their back on a regional ally. And what did the US have to show for in return? Nada. Heck, turkey is even buying Russian hardware these days. That's a signicant loas...

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk

yes, my definition of being owned.
 
Wait, your definition is ownage limits itself to uniformed casualties? The turks got free rein to a large chunk of a foreign country by getting the US to turn their back on a regional ally. And what did the US have to show for in return? Nada. Heck, turkey is even buying Russian hardware these days. That's a signicant loas...

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk

Kurds are US allies? Under Obama yes.
 
The Kurds are a nationality/country now? The U.S. officially allies itself with countries, not groups.

The Kurds were a means to an end, nothing else. That's how wars and conflicts work.

You do remember that the Soviet Union, the United States and the United Kingdom (Grand Alliance) were allies at the end of WWII right?
The Kurds are an ethnicity. They control parts of Syria currently. Their ethnicity is also present in Iraq where the US funded them during gulf wars as well.
You can be an ally with whoever you want. there's no rule that says it can only be a state.
That being said, alliances are made for a purpose. That purpose is no longer clear in Syria, so the USA left. after WW2, once the common enemy was defeated, they split the countries and went back to doing their own things, which also meant hating each other (west vs east).
 
https://nypost.com/2019/10/23/house-republicans-storm-closed-door-trump-impeachment-hearing/
House Republicans storm closed-door Trump impeachment hearing in SCIF
Some 30 House Republicans on Wednesday stormed their way into a closed-door hearing in a secure House Intelligence Committee meeting room to rip the Democrat-led impeachment inquiry against President Trump.

The pro-Trump lawmakers, led by Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, barged into the sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF) where Deputy Assistant Defense Secretary Laura Cooper was giving a deposition.

”Let us in!” cried the lawmakers, some of whom were carrying cellphones into the secure location, a violation of committee rules.

A source in the room told CNN that as Cooper, a Russia and Ukraine expert, sat down to testify, the Republicans rushed through the room’s three doors.

Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-Ala.) was yelling at House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, but the California Democrat did not respond, the source said.

Other Democrats, including Rep. Val Demings of Florida, shouted back at Byrne and Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), who were yelling about the closed-door process.

“It was closest thing I’ve seen around here to mass civil unrest as a member of Congress,” the source told the network.

Republican defenders of the president have called the impeachment proceedings unfair because of the lack of transparency — even though they also conducted many of their own probes the same way when they held the majority.
The GOP-led investigations into the terror attack in 2012 on the US Embassy in Benghazi, Libya, for example, were mostly conducted behind closed doors, with the Republicans then arguing that secrecy was essential.

In the impeachment matter, Schiff has said the depositions have to remain confidential so that future witnesses won’t have the opportunity to coordinate their stories.

Democrats said they would eventually conduct hearings in public to present the evidence against the president that they are gathering.

Cooper left the room while the Republicans refused to leave, and the Capitol Police and sergeant at arms were brought in to end the stalemate.

Only members of the three committees — Intelligence, Oversight and Foreign Affairs — conducting the probe were authorized to be in the hearing.
Cooper was expected to face questions about Trump’s decision to withhold nearly $400 million in security assistance to Ukraine approved by Congress to help deal with Russia-backed separatists in the eastern part of the country.

Her testimony came a day after William Taylor, the US ambassador to Ukraine, said he was told by Gordon Sondland, the US envoy to the EU, that Trump wanted Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden’s tenure on the board of a Ukrainian energy company called Burisma, and an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory that Ukraine, and not Russia, meddled in the 2016 presidential election.

Cooper apparently appeared voluntarily before the lawmakers as the Pentagon had not blocked her from testifying, as they had tried to block Taylor.

Earlier Wednesday, Trump quoted Rep. John Ratliffe (R-Texas), an ardent supporter, disparaging Taylor’s testimony.

“Neither he (Taylor) or any other witness has provided testimony that the Ukrainians were aware that military aid was being withheld. You can’t have a quid pro quo with no quo.” Congressman John Ratcliffe @foxandfriends Where is the Whistleblower? The Do Nothing Dems case is DEAD!” the commander-in-chief tweeted.
This is getting better by the day, I'm waiting for the flying kicks and chair throwing soon.


Going to be like Turkey and Ukraine soon
 
This circus is turning out even better then expected. 'Yolo' from both sides for different reasons.

They couldn't even come up with stuff like that in House of Cards. This election has to be the best reality show ever. The spins are so unpredictable.

Brb poppin some of em peach mints.







Meanwhile: Kurdish SDF Commander General Mazloum Thanks President Trump



Let's recap Trump's moves:

-Pulled out troops against the recommendations of his advisors, saving American and Turkish lives in the process
-Gets thanked by the Kurdish SDF General for saving Kurdish lives

Orange man still bad now?


https://i.imgur.com/tfLE1GX.jpg

Democrats be like:

maxresdefault.jpg
 
The agenda is clear. Right or wrong, it seems to be working.
Smear Trump with as much crap as possible, and people will eventually get tired of him. The dems are hoping that no matter who their candidate will be, everyone will vote against Trump because they'll be sick of him by next year. So many lawsuits against him can't be good. All these lawsuits can't be wrong, that's what the dems want everyone to think. it doesn't matter whether they make any sense, just pile on the lawsuits and eventually you'll wear the population down. if you can't break Trump, break his voters and you stand a chance.
 
The agenda is clear. Right or wrong, it seems to be working.
Smear Trump with as much crap as possible, and people will eventually get tired of him. The dems are hoping that no matter who their candidate will be, everyone will vote against Trump because they'll be sick of him by next year. So many lawsuits against him can't be good. All these lawsuits can't be wrong, that's what the dems want everyone to think. it doesn't matter whether they make any sense, just pile on the lawsuits and eventually you'll wear the population down. if you can't break Trump, break his voters and you stand a chance.

That does seem to be the plan. The problem with this plan? It makes the assumption that the majority of Americans are stupid.
2020 will be a litmus test to see just how many Americans are:
-Paying attention
-Hopelessly brainwashed
-Completely apathetic

We just had our litmus test and that didn't go so well, so we'll see.

Personally I think the Dems have gone beyond full retard the last couple months (the last few years were simply full retard) and I think they've gone too far. If the people stand for this, then any sense of real American democracy is in serious danger.
 
That does seem to be the plan. The problem with this plan? It makes the assumption that the majority of Americans are stupid.
2020 will be a litmus test to see just how many Americans are:
-Paying attention
-Hopelessly brainwashed
-Completely apathetic

We just had our litmus test and that didn't go so well, so we'll see.

Personally I think the Dems have gone beyond full retard the last couple months (the last few years were simply full retard) and I think they've gone too far. If the people stand for this, then any sense of real American democracy is in serious danger.

the polls show it's working. people are getting tired of this. most people trust what they see on tv and either don't know or can't be bothered to look things up themselves to make their own minds. then you got the people propelling propaganda one way or another which polarize the situation too much so it's one or the other. there's no "he made a mistake here but he was right there". there's no grey areas. you're either for or against. if you're a moderate and admit that your side made a mistake, you're thrown to the wolves. most will support their side to the death even when it's clearly wrong.
 
politics is a dirty dirty game. the republicans are dirty and the democrats are trying to point that out so that people forget that democrats are just as dirty. nobody is clean in this whole charade, yet everyone is trying to pass of as holy.

who cares if schiff is al gore's 6th cousing twice removed? or if some senator has family drama going on? senators are people too. they're allowed having a life, and it's not always perfect. in fact, it's never perfect.

who cares that CNN is saying the word 'emoluments' over and over and over although it's clearly b.s. and there's nothing in the law that says there's an issue there?

some people care about these things, depending on which side they are on.
 
What about yesterday's stupid stunt when some geniuses breached a secure facility to make some sort of point? How is that supposed to be helpful to the cause?

Trump must have been bored yesterday, turning on some of the party establishment and having some choice words for them:
The Never Trumper Republicans, though on respirators with not many left, are in certain ways worse and more dangerous for our Country than the Do Nothing Democrats. Watch out for them, they are human scum!
 
Back
Top