PsychoBandito
New member
Because Trump still controls the flow of military aid to them?
qui s'excuse s'accuse.
This would be one of those times where it would help Trump to STFU for once. Nothing to gain from yapping. he just takes shots at everyone for the sake of not keeping silent, and it's causing more harm than good.
Chart makes no sense. TIME, Politico and NPR in the middle? LOL.
buzzfeed up top lol is this real life?
Cute Chart Vanessa! Unfortunately, it has 0 credibility.
Lol, inb4 Trump is evil for defending Biden.
Chart makes no sense. TIME, Politico and NPR in the middle? LOL.
Me semble que même depuis avant son élection «*shit is about to hit the fan*» mais y’a jamais rien qui se passe. Comme les prédictions de Q y’a toujours de quoi de gros qui s’en vient, mais ça se réalise jamais. Ça doit être les masterminds qui s’occupent de gérer le twitter de Trump qui s’organisent pour garder leur électorat sous alerte, un peu comme un âne qui marche pour attraper une carotte attachée devant lui.
Me semble que même depuis avant son élection «*shit is about to hit the fan*» mais y’a jamais rien qui se passe. Comme les prédictions de Q y’a toujours de quoi de gros qui s’en vient, mais ça se réalise jamais. Ça doit être les masterminds qui s’occupent de gérer le twitter de Trump qui s’organisent pour garder leur électorat sous alerte, un peu comme un âne qui marche pour attraper une carotte attachée devant lui.
Just a quick question for anybody who actually believes the things coming out the mouths of Schiff or Vindman; How is it that they both clearly state they do not know who the whistleblower is but then refuse to allow/answer a question about who Vindman talked to about the call saying that they'll out the whistle blower by doing so.
Because once you start floating names and people start digging it won't take years to go through the maybe dozen people it could possibly be. The White-House probably already has a list of 4-5 people it suspects and then if you start naming people and one overlaps, won't take 5 minutes before President Cheetoh is on twitter ranting about it.
Just a quick question for anybody who actually believes the things coming out the mouths of Schiff or Vindman; How is it that they both clearly state they do not know who the whistleblower is but then refuse to allow/answer a question about who Vindman talked to about the call saying that they'll out the whistle blower by doing so.
I'm still waiting on an answer for the bank question from the last page.
Ok, lets take your bank example.
I am the ring leader of a group. I send a few of my best men to rob the bank. I am home while the video is recording, so I'm obviously not on it. My men come home and I take a large sum of that money for my role as organizer. Am I innocent of all crime?
I didn't bother answering because your example is completely off base. See the premise that kicked this all off was that Present Trump himself on the call forced Ukraine to investigate specifically Biden. There is no "off site ring leader" in this scenario. Now that they've been called out on their BS story it's magically evolving into another claim (still no ring leader) because the tapes are empty. When you ask them for those new details, can't, because "whistleblower".
Basically any time Schitt interjects, pay extra special attention to what was being asked/said because they don't want you thinking about it.
I don't understand how you don't see that the phone call was what got people looking into it. The accusation is not "did he one time on this one very specific phone call ask him to do this and never once again." It's "did the president order the withholding the funds unless an investigation is ordered."