Donald John Trump is no longer president: what does it mean for you?

There is a difference with absentee voting by mail which is a microscopic fraction of the total vote to assist those who are away from where they consider home and country/state wide voting by mail. If you don't understand the difference in magnitude I can't be bothered to discuss any further because it's pointless. Also in a presidential election does it really matter where you vote from?

As far as Kayleeigh, ultimately who are you to decide where she calls home. What if she plans to move back there when she retires, her family is there and she doesn't want a Democrat to fuck it up while she's away. As long as she votes once, there is nothing wrong.

I'm glad what's her face voted. Getting people to vote should be the main objective in a healthy democracy, more so one faced with a health crisis.

But it's not accurate to call it an absentee ballot. There is no requirement to be absent. Anyone can request one in Florida. "no excuse is needed to vote a vote-by-mail ballot" https://dos.myflorida.com/elections/for-voters/voting/vote-by-mail/

Sorry, reality doesn't back that claim of an 'absentee' / way to re-frame the issue. Everyone can do it. So why use it if they're against it?

Why is Kelly-Anne Conway basically calling going to the poll a citizen's responsibility akin to a pilgrimage... 'people wait in line longer for other thing' It rings a bit hollow when she voted...by mail.

You can't praise this extra-accessibility /convenience on one hand when it suits a person and then claim it's too crooked to be trusted on the other. Sorry, that just won't do. That's a shit strategy. it's dishonest and it falls appart at the seams.

Let me simplify it to a grade 5 level for you, but firstly we have to take a step back and consider there are three main pillars to society. Government, Business and the People. None of these three left with unchecked power is good.Basically it is acceptable until you reach the stage of monopolies, dictatorships or mob rule. Calling out any one of these as you approach that stage doesn't mean you're against them per say, just trying to keep things in balance.

Now think of it like a slightly more complex game of rock paper scissor. Business can beat any one individual but the government is there to keep business in check with non obtrusive laws, and an educated population is supposed to keep the government in check by voting.

But here people are not understanding this is reaching the critical point where they're getting to influence levels that can shape public opinions and policy. Government stepping in is the right action to put things back into balance, then they could fuck off again.

Back to the topic, Twitter was flat out wrong with their "fact check" about how there's no potential increase in fraud with mail-in ballots and this was the straw that broke the camels back. We're not talking about one piece of straw, the shit they and other social media platforms have been pilling up over the last 3 years is heavy. At the end of the day, it's there job to host a platform where people can communicate, not to be the gatekeepers of said communications, especially when it come to things that are against what they believe.

Ah, I love it when you're angry! Coronavirus is pretty cool! I've been on break for months and I automatically go to 6th grade next year!

So you'd rather take Trump's word over the Federal Election Commission (FEC) Commissioner's? Btw He never claimed there was no potential risk (way to re-write history) what he did was overstated the extent of fraud and didn't back it up.

There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent.
- Trump
vs

"There's simply no basis for the conspiracy theory that voting by mail causes fraud. None,"
- Weintraub aka FEC pointing to fact checks from The Washington Post and CNN, as well as reports from other organizations about the effectiveness of the voting method.

Sounds like that would be trusting the politicians out of the blue claims over the impartial person in government in charge of elections...https://thehill.com/homenews/campai...or-trump-claims-voting-by-mail-leads-to-fraud

If Snopes get to call it BS (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/mail-in-ballot-voter-fraud/) why can't twitter do it? What makes one different over the other?

Is Trump above editorial content on the internet? Is that what it is?

It's quite novel to see republicans cheering for restraints on the 1st amendment. He even called it "defending free speech" lol

Yes, Let's build the "great firewall" so only the chosen few platforms can exist, so long as it's done in a way consistent with what the government is willing to allow. We're doing it for your safety, citizen.

I can't wait to see which new enemy they will pledge to protect their flock from next.

^ Hahah gotta give it to this guy when he's pissed off at someone/something his motivation level is quite impressive to get shit done lol.

This has been waiting in the wings for months. It's not like he took a break from rage tweeting to draft this. Political parties / governments always have these things set aide waiting for the right opportunity / crisis.

"That is consistent with a draft order whose text CNN first reported last summer -- and which prompted FCC officials to push back on the plan privately." https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/28/politics/trump-twitter-social-media-executive-order/index.html

It'll polarize his base in their hate against all things silicon valley, the democratic / Californian elite.

It's a smart move from their perspective. It's all about muddying the water. The expected court challenges will make this "the gift that keeps on giving" throughout the election period by keeping it in the news cycle.

He's setting the stage for disagreeing with the election results if they don't suit him. It's quite obvious.
 
Last edited:
Twitter almost backed down from Trump's strongly worded executive order.

JK. They're actually censoring him now. You have to click on the disclaimer before you can take in your dose of wisdom.

trump-tweet-on-mpls.jpg


https://www.fox9.com/news/twitter-s...ing-use-of-force-to-control-minneapolis-riots
 
You realize that to this day 250R still believes that there was massive fraud to the tune of millions of votes in 2016? Every time I've asked him to provide any evidence of it the best he can muster up is a few cases here and there. I'd settle for proof of 10 000 cases of voter fraud 4 years later and still waiting, maybe Qanon will dump it in november?

It's ironic that for years republicans have been arguing that these federal agencies shouldn't be creating the rules that implement the legislation passed by congress but rather congress should be making specific rules yet here we are delegating to a federal agency to make the rules POTUS wants without going through congress.

It's also impressive how Trump has managed to make it about him again, he won't let people dishonor the memory of George Floyd? LOL
 
Last edited:
Qu’est-ce que Trump ne comprend pas des politiques et règlements de la plate-forme Twitter?

S’il enfreint les règles, il est pénalisé tout simplement. Ce n’est pas à cause qu’il est le POTUS, qui est au dessus des lois d’une entreprise privé.

Être Twitter, je le kick out lol

Il est assez troll pour revenir sous le Username Donald Trump 2
 
I always wondered what where the limitations of executive orders. Normal laws have to pass through congress and then be ratified by the senate. They can be challenged at the Supreme Court level. If EOs are a way to bypass all that, what would prevent a democrat president from passing an Executive Order limiting the second amendment?
 
So we’re gonna go running straight to “big government knows best”?

The big networks don’t pretend they’re neutral and it’s fine. They control / edit the content at will.Their money printing licence isn’t threatened.

What makes social media so different that they have to play ball?

Les médias conventionnels ont des partis pris, c'est pas un secret et ils s'affirment là dedans, il y a des médias de gauche, des médias de centre, des médias de droite, tu choisi lui que tu veux écouter comme un grand garçon pis that's it. Par contre si tous les médias étaient sous le même propriétaire et celui-ci pourrait décider qu'uniquement de l'information de gauche puisse sortir, ca serait pas la même game right? Peut importe le poste que tu choisirais d'écouter, il serait biaiser pour laisser couler la même information...

Facebook et compagnie sa couvre le 3/4 de la planète et contairement aux médias conventionnels ils te connaissent personnellement et sont en mesure de t'influencer en fonction de tes données à PAS MAL plus grande échelle qu'un média que tu dois volontairement écouter. Les algos qu'ils ont sont tout simplement trop avancés pour que quiconque puisse prétendre être à l'abris de ca...Si tu n'as pas de facebook google va te pogner dans le détour, si c'est pas eux ce sera Microsoft sinon ce sera apple, tu vas aller sur le site de canadian tire pour te rendre compte que leurs propres engin de pubs est drivé par google qui eux ont des données sur toi, il n'y a pas de fucking limite ils vont t'atteindre sans que tu le sache point final.


Le "government knows best" a rien à voir dans la règlementation, c'est pas au gouvernement de déterminer qu'est-ce qui doit être dit qu'est-ce qui ne doit pas l'être, c'est au gouvernement de règlementer le fait que TOUT peut être dis et rien ne doit être filtré autre que du contenu illégal etc...N'importe qui peut sortir sa propre bullshit, l'important c'est que personne "en haut" puisse controller la bullshit qu'il veut exposer, c'est quoi qui n'est pas fair la dedans exactement?

Honnêtement c'est un débât qui n'a aucun rapport à Trump, si tu n'es pas capable de reconnaitre à quel point sa peut-être dangereux et que sa n'a rien à voir aux médias conventionnels simplement parce que Trump abonde en ce sens, sa sert à rien de débattre j'attendrai que Trump dise le contraire pour que tu sois d'accord :)
 
Last edited:
trump a tweeter:

Twitter is doing nothing about all of the lies & propaganda being put out by China or the Radical Left Democrat Party. They have targeted Republicans, Conservatives & the President of the United States. Section 230 should be revoked by Congress. Until then, it will be regulated!


ca peut etre possitif ou tres negatif. si le gouvernement mets leur main sur les tech. le resulta peut etre horrible.
 
I always wondered what where the limitations of executive orders. Normal laws have to pass through congress and then be ratified by the senate. They can be challenged at the Supreme Court level. If EOs are a way to bypass all that, what would prevent a democrat president from passing an Executive Order limiting the second amendment?

EO can be highly effective but easily revokable, anything passed with an EO can be revoked by another, a bunch of Obama era policies (from his last term where congress refused to do anything) were quickly undone when Trump came into power. They are much weaker than law, revoking a law would require passing a new law to do so and that's a whole process again.
 
Honnêtement c'est un débât qui n'a aucun rapport à Trump, si tu n'es pas capable de reconnaitre à quel point sa peut-être dangereux et que sa n'a rien à voir aux médias conventionnels simplement parce que Trump abonde en ce sens, sa sert à rien de débattre j'attendrai que Trump dise le contraire pour que tu sois d'accord :)

Oui, oui, je me lève le matin pour voir ce que Trump aime et par principe je suis contre a tout coup. Vous êtes tellement perspicace.

Oui, il mérite d'avoir un débat de fond sur les médias sociaux. Les bots, les fake accounts, les profils et le micro-targeting. Ça fais plusieurs élections ou on sait que c'est une force importante. Y'a surement des bons articles sur arstechnica, bellingcat ou autre place qui font du journalisme d'enquête la dessus. Fondamentalement, c'est quelque chose qui devait être examiné par le congrès en vu de légiférer au besoin plus que par décret de l'exécutif qui tombe du ciel.

Mais c'est pas ce qui se passe ici. De par l'executive order il veut se servir du FCC et des lois actuels pour serrer la vis a twitter parce qu'il se sent injustement visé.

Le contexte est indissociable et crois le, crois le pas, t'es sur un thread qui parle de Donald... P-e que le monde vont parler de... Donald?

Ment / twist les faits 16 000 fois en 3 ans et est surpris qu'on qualifie ses propos sur l'internet de pas fiable. Mais quelle injustice!

Screen_Shot_2018-10-25_at_11.02.15_AM.png
 
I mean shit like this is happening on Twitter on a daily basis.

dR9Kfyj.jpg

1HN4IuV.png


Yet I don't see anything on "Twitter rules about gloryfing violence".

Twitter deserves absolutely everything that happens to them now. Maybe they can send a bill to the "Woke TDS mob" that led them down this path.
 
un nice thread de 4chan. Je nai pas la connaisence necessaire pour commanter.


>TL: DR trump forces (((them))) to allow free speech or lose all users and go bankrupt in a ton of billion-dollar lawsuits.
Trump signing that executive order changing CDA 230 is beneficial to everyone It forces (((twitter))),jewtube, and faceberg to either become true platforms or become publishers.

>whats the change
>Platforms are free speech havens where the owner CANNOT change any content or ban people regardless of opinion unless its CP, and threats of violence, thus they are not held legally liable for any content user posts. If they censor ANY opinion other than E.G kill all white people, and CP they will lose this status

>publishers
CAN moderate, censor, and regulate speech , however get no money from the government , and the OWNERS are legally liable for ANYTHING their users say. E.G someone posts CP and twitter is the one who gets charges leveled against them or someone slanders and twitter is held responsible for that slander.

>basicly you can now post anything you want now as long as it does not contain threats of violence or CP,and (((they))) have to accept it

>myths
>Twitter will just hyper censor everything now
Well then they have to start censoring the Black Lives Matter, and SJW groups who on a daily bases says, "kill all white people". Because now they are not a platform they can and will be sued and given criminal charges. How long do you think even sjw's are gonna stay?

>they will force people to put all their information on the site
How appealing so you think that will be for users, even normie ones?

>this will collapse all social media
Shill, if anything its gonna force people to GAB, and Bitchute, or force companies to stop using algorithms to control people. Either they change or commit self suicide.
 
250R c’est un loose canon. I’m still waiting for his great, tremendous, strong picture of his beautiful MAGA hat. Perhaps he is ashamed or shy...


Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
 
Quel des deux groupe qui Fesse du monde et LOOT des magazins?

Quelle des 2 groupes se présente en assemblée législative armé de gun pour manifester / intimider les parlementaires du Michigan? On peut aller loin à ce jeu...


Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
 
Quelle des 2 groupes se présente en assemblée législative armé de gun pour manifester / intimider les parlementaires du Michigan? On peut aller loin à ce jeu...


Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
Sauf que c'est légal au Michigan.
 
Back
Top