The whole point of the Mueller report was to find out if he colluded with the Russians.
The result is a 300 page report saying that there isn't any conclusive evidence that he did. BUT he may have interfered with justice, which is not the scope of the report.
Mueller didn't specify anything clearly. It was a total fiasco. He said that he cannot indict the president. He didn't say there is a valid reason to. He just said he can't indict, which is correct. His report would be provided to congress who asked for the report, and they can do something about it.
That story has since ended. If the dems let it go, there's nothing there.
Well seeing as there are essentially two parts to the report (and one deals with 45's potential obstruction) it's pretty hard to cast that aside completely as out of bounds. The president's reaction and ongoing efforts were not something they could have anticipated when they set the parameters for the initial investigation. It went on to take a level of significance far beyond trivial.
Nothing can be expected to be spelled clearly when it's served up in partly redacted legalese and bound by other administrative factors such as DOJ policy.
Anyhow, merely stating it has "ended" or that it is "done" may be wishful thinking but does not make it so. No smoking gun does not mean no liability whatsoever IMO.
Yes, in our era of short attention spans and in the face of other pending matters, this train has effectively left the station. I wouldn't write it off completely just yet. It could come back in parts (or whole) when certain conditions are met or if new information is uncovered. If this happens or not will no doubt be conditional on the right political conditions being present as well.
There is room for a healthy middle ground somewhere between "the holy grail" and "nothing burger"