Donald John Trump is no longer president: what does it mean for you?
- Thread starter Rick 944
- Start date
Larkee
Well-known member
Granted, I would love to see him being exposed. That being said, it's a NYT piece. The NYT that after the 2016 election had a full page add in their paper announcing that they would focus on reporting the truth from then on. They hired Bari Weis as staff editor specifically for that. Well Bari gave up on the NYT this year and wrote a letter on her webpage explaining her decision. She gave up on the second most prestigious job in journalism because the woke radicals are still running the show at the NYT.
For those reasons, I'll wait for confirmation and references on that article.
For those reasons, I'll wait for confirmation and references on that article.
rollingsound
New member
Editorial Board at the Times is turning to shit, BUT, their investigative reporting is still top notch and NOOOO fucking way would they run this w/o it being bullet proof, they probably vetted this more than anything they've ever done and passed it by legal team for a good while. It's the real deal.
wrxt
Well-known member
Exact, on peut tu se fier au New York Times pour avoir tous les faits? Pas sur. Mais c'est sur que Trump a fait des magouilles et qu'il est pas entièrement clean.
Donald John Trump is now president: what does it mean for you?
They won't. They'll attack the source and then re-direct to something else about sleepy joe or the democrats.
Besides, a lot of people think cheating on your taxes is some sort of badge of honour. It was pretty much expected of him anyways.
You're basically extending the benefit of the doubt to the guy who's racked up thousand of conflicts of interest (3400+)
as well as 20 000+ lies or misleading claims since he was elected.
That's mighty kind of you.
I mean, it's not like he took this up to the supreme court pleading some bogus legal concept of immunity so that his taxes wouldn't get disclosed (and lost) or that the federal courts found that he has violated the constitution's emoluments clause.
I see what you're saying, but Trump ran out of credibility a while back. Going with the balance of probabilities and all, I'm inclined to believe the NYT unless proven otherwise. They legitimately have more at stake as to the accuracy of this information than Trump does.
They won't. They'll attack the source and then re-direct to something else about sleepy joe or the democrats.
Besides, a lot of people think cheating on your taxes is some sort of badge of honour. It was pretty much expected of him anyways.
You're basically extending the benefit of the doubt to the guy who's racked up thousand of conflicts of interest (3400+)
as well as 20 000+ lies or misleading claims since he was elected.
That's mighty kind of you.
I mean, it's not like he took this up to the supreme court pleading some bogus legal concept of immunity so that his taxes wouldn't get disclosed (and lost) or that the federal courts found that he has violated the constitution's emoluments clause.
I see what you're saying, but Trump ran out of credibility a while back. Going with the balance of probabilities and all, I'm inclined to believe the NYT unless proven otherwise. They legitimately have more at stake as to the accuracy of this information than Trump does.
Last edited:
Ohhh what a surprise! Oh wait not! Everyone knew it! Trump is a pathetic little liar conman.
Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
Spaceman Spiff
Well-known member
As a general rule, the more someone brags about being rich, the more likely he's crumbling under the weight of his debts.
2016 was the greatest cautionary tale no one heeded. Undermining traditional medias so that social medias could be used to construct a micro-targeted alternative reality to the people that were the most vulnerable to it.
Oh look, they even got BLM out of the moth balls just in time to whip up some hysteria.
Where were these guys in 2017? 2018? 2019? Interesting how the divisive rhetorics get cranked up to 11 in an election year. There are some busy trolls on both sides of the aisle out there...
He's been running that country like his businesses. Into the ground.
Oh look, they even got BLM out of the moth balls just in time to whip up some hysteria.
Where were these guys in 2017? 2018? 2019? Interesting how the divisive rhetorics get cranked up to 11 in an election year. There are some busy trolls on both sides of the aisle out there...
He's been running that country like his businesses. Into the ground.
As it's been said you're conflating the editorial side and the news side.
Trump is gonna claim fake news yaddi yadda, all he has to do is release his tax returns to prove that it's all fake and fabricated which would go miles towards his relection but if he won't which is all the confirmation a sane person needs.
Believe it or not, if you lose more money than you earn in a given year, you will probably not have to pay any income tax.
Other "scoops" from this story:
Other "scoops" from this story:
- There are no russian secrets in Trump's finances ( a delusion of the resistence of the past few years)
- Trump is not using the Presidency to enrich himself (yet another resistence lie/delusion)
- Trump pays more in taxes than Jeff Bezos
Yeah... Remember when he wanted to do the G7 at his property and had to back down?
Hasn't stopped him from going to his properties hundreds of times to play golf. You don't think anyone gets paid when all the staffers and secret service tag along?
How about that one overseas trip when the VP stayed at a Trump property even though it was far / was a logistical nightmare.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/202...tion-nearly-1-million-dollars-for-hotel-rooms
The information is out there....
https://www.local10.com/news/local/...med-barricades-self-in-fl-home-police-called/
Parscale gonne loco.
How the mighty have fallen... I bet it'd be interesting the beans he could spill if he had an existential crisis of sorts.
They're probably going to keep him heavily sedated until Nov 3rd just in case.
Parscale gonne loco.
How the mighty have fallen... I bet it'd be interesting the beans he could spill if he had an existential crisis of sorts.
They're probably going to keep him heavily sedated until Nov 3rd just in case.
Again, what is there to defend? Donald Trump being a shitty businessman not paying taxes is neither news or a bombshell, the NY times have been running similar version of that same story for the last four years.
This one is from 2018: Trump Engaged in Suspect Tax Schemes as He Reaped Riches From His Father
Here's another one from 2019: 1 Billion in Losses: A Decade of Trump's Taxes
And 2016: Donald Trump Used Legally Dubious Method to Avoid Paying Taxes
There are a few new details, the 750$ for example, but he bragged in a debate with Hilary that he doesn't pay much or anything at all.
The other revelation is no financial links to Russia in his returns, which is kind of a big deal since these clowns have been pushing that Trump had withheld his tax records to conceal compromising financial ties to Russia.
What Trump's tax returns could reveal about Russia
This one is from 2018: Trump Engaged in Suspect Tax Schemes as He Reaped Riches From His Father
Here's another one from 2019: 1 Billion in Losses: A Decade of Trump's Taxes
And 2016: Donald Trump Used Legally Dubious Method to Avoid Paying Taxes
There are a few new details, the 750$ for example, but he bragged in a debate with Hilary that he doesn't pay much or anything at all.
The other revelation is no financial links to Russia in his returns, which is kind of a big deal since these clowns have been pushing that Trump had withheld his tax records to conceal compromising financial ties to Russia.
What Trump's tax returns could reveal about Russia
Spaceman Spiff
Well-known member
More relevant bombshells from the article:
-"Also hanging over him is a decade-long audit battle with the Internal Revenue Service over the legitimacy of a $72.9 million tax refund that he claimed, and received, after declaring huge losses. An adverse ruling could cost him more than $100 million."
-Trump owes over $300M to foreign banks and can't pay them back. That's a huge leverage on the president of the united states. Usually having large debts disqualifies people from posts that have high security clearances.
-"Also hanging over him is a decade-long audit battle with the Internal Revenue Service over the legitimacy of a $72.9 million tax refund that he claimed, and received, after declaring huge losses. An adverse ruling could cost him more than $100 million."
-Trump owes over $300M to foreign banks and can't pay them back. That's a huge leverage on the president of the united states. Usually having large debts disqualifies people from posts that have high security clearances.
AsunaMAXXX
Legacy Member
c'est fou pareil comment les médias s'intéresse au finance de Trump et essais de lui nuire
meanwhile les médias sont pas mal discret sur le fait que Dieu donné Obama avait un net worth familial ( placement, maison , etc etc ) de 1.3 million avant d'arriver a Washington ...
8 ans + tard après sa présidence , net worth d'over 20 millions !
Parlons des Clintons , + 240 millions depuis 2001 !
mais let's go , trouvons des bebittes sur Trump qui refuse de toucher son salaire de POTUS .... mais blâmons le parce qu'il essait d'organiser une/des rencontres dans ses resorts et qu'une de ses compagnies fassent quelques $$$
avec du recul , c'est une erreur d'avoir refusé son salaire de POTUS
meanwhile les médias sont pas mal discret sur le fait que Dieu donné Obama avait un net worth familial ( placement, maison , etc etc ) de 1.3 million avant d'arriver a Washington ...
8 ans + tard après sa présidence , net worth d'over 20 millions !
Parlons des Clintons , + 240 millions depuis 2001 !
mais let's go , trouvons des bebittes sur Trump qui refuse de toucher son salaire de POTUS .... mais blâmons le parce qu'il essait d'organiser une/des rencontres dans ses resorts et qu'une de ses compagnies fassent quelques $$$
avec du recul , c'est une erreur d'avoir refusé son salaire de POTUS
Obama et les clintons charge facilement $250k par événement publique/conférence/allocution qu'il font. À la quantité d'évenement bobo corpo qu'il font dans une année arrivé a 20 million c'est facile.
AsunaMAXXX
Legacy Member
les événements corpo c'est après avoir été POTUS, y'a des deals de maison d'édition pendant ta présidence
Les Obama maintenant c'est over 40 millions , pour le 240millions des Clintons , c'était de 2001-2015
Spaceman Spiff
Well-known member
L'histoire de refuser de toucher son salaire de POTUS c'est juste du virtue signaling.
Qu'un ancien président se mette à faire de l'argent après sa présidence n'a rien de scandaleux et c'est normal de monnayer sa notoriété. Autant Obama que Bush ou les Clintons n'ont jamais caché leurs finances.
Le problème c'est quand un Président refuse de céder le contrôle de ses entreprises pendant son mandat et se place visiblement en conflit d'intérêt.