For Miles, there are two points. One, the NYT either didn't do their due diligence or they helped the lie when they allowed it to come out as a "top official". If it was published as "a low level worker of the Trump admin", the importance of the story quickly fades. They built it up like it was Pence who wrote it when really he was some low to mid level schmuck that only became Chief of staff to a department after the article. Then he lied to CNN when they asked him if he was the source yet they won't fire him now. The left protects their own on all fronts.
The WSJ, I didn't see the full article either but it was to show the fact that the main sources were all shit. Yes, spinners gonna spin, especially if paid but as a result I ask; why was the Russian hoax peddled for almost 4 years without question and more importantly any due diligence yet now they all come out with "journalistic integrity" and say that we can't talk about the Biden laptop until it's thoroughly vetted? Hypocrisy dial to 11. That's why I bring it up.
Considering all that's fucked up with the World / U.S, what does it say about the Trump campaign when the leading charge against the opposition is some ethical business angle with the VP's deadbeat son. Isn't that what you get when you neglect your family for the benefit of your own political career / aspiration? Hunter likely never had much going for him besides the family name. Can't the same be said about much of the business / political elite? It's a pretty close circle...
Doesn't it strike you as a bit ironic? I think it's unfortunate that this just might be the thing that defines the late stage of this whole presidential campaign.