student13
Member
Hi , I in the last year got a "red light" photo radar ticket. I would like to know the implications of the recent Superior Court judgement on the issue. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-photo-radar-1.3874485
1. Does the judgement affect , red light photo radar or just speed photo radar?
2. Does the judgement say that an officer needs to be witness to the infraction at the physical location of said infraction --( this was the only legal point that was ambiguous to me).
3. Many months ago, (before cbc news article) I requested as part of communication of proof showing calibration and maintenance history of said photo radar -- the minster of justice refused to divulge that information, how does this affect my case and what should I say to the judge about this?
Thank you in advance for all serious comments.
1. Does the judgement affect , red light photo radar or just speed photo radar?
2. Does the judgement say that an officer needs to be witness to the infraction at the physical location of said infraction --( this was the only legal point that was ambiguous to me).
3. Many months ago, (before cbc news article) I requested as part of communication of proof showing calibration and maintenance history of said photo radar -- the minster of justice refused to divulge that information, how does this affect my case and what should I say to the judge about this?
Thank you in advance for all serious comments.