Notre systeme de justice

SRT-What? said:

Ça aurait été mieux pour tout le monde qui meurt à place d'avoir juste été blessé.

Click to expand...

Le concessionnaire automobile a également été condamné à verser 30 000 $ pour couvrir les frais juridiques du plaignant.

Click to expand...

XoX1de said:

http://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/justice-et-affaires-criminelles/actualites-judiciaires/201703/12/01-5077979-un-concessionnaire-poursuivi-par-le-voleur-de-son-vehicule-ira-en-cour-supreme.php

TL;DR, voleur vole un char et fait un accident, il poursuit le proprietaire de char et maintenant la cour supreme va entendre la cause.

what the fuck Canada?

Click to expand...

Superior Court Justice Johanne Morissette determined Rankin owed J.J. a duty of care because, among other things, people entrusted with motor vehicles “must assure themselves that the youth in their community are not able to take possession of such dangerous objects.”The jury then found the injured teen and the defendants negligent, but laid the bulk of the blame – 37 per cent – on the garage owner. In doing so, jurors cited the fact that the car was unlocked, the key was in the vehicle, and that Rankin should have known there was a risk of theft.

Click to expand...

Rankin, Huscroft found, had abrogated his responsibility for securing the cars against theft by minors like J.J. and while a different jury might have parcelled out the blame differently, its conclusions were not unreasonable. The court also ordered Rankin to pay J.J. $30,000 in legal costs.

Click to expand...