Canada's Migrant Problem Should not be Ignored

Spaceman Spiff said:

Do you have a link to that plan?

Click to expand...

KossaK said:

un replacement de la population.

-Nos ecole enseigne que les blanc = mechant.
-il a du chaillage que les travailleur d'origine Italian Irlandaise et Francaise (les blancs) coute trop cher sur sur le marcher du travaille.
ce n estai pas le cas il y a 50 ans.
-Les immigrant sont du cheap labor.

a mon avis le remplacement des blanc est economique.
il nous faut suivre l argent ou tout autre anologue a l argent....

Je relis des points p-e je suis dans le champs.

Click to expand...

The Lessons of History(11)

There was a deglobalization implosion after 1914, driven by two world wars, two periods of fragile peace, the Great Depression and the Cold War. The last few decades of the 20th century have marked a successful struggle to reconstruct that pre-World War I global economy. Conventional wisdom has it that these spectacular changes in global policy were regime switches that were pretty much independent of economic events; thus they can be taken as exogenous.

This view ignores the fact that immigration policy in labor-scarce parts of the global economy became increasingly restrictive prior to 1914 and that much of this retreat from open immigration policies was driven by a defense of the deteriorating relative economic position of the working poor. It also ignores the fact that liberal attitudes toward trade were brief and that protection rose sharply almost everywhere on the European continent from the 1870s onwards. Most of this retreat from free trade was driven by a defense of the relative economic position of both the landed rich and the landless poor.(12)

Thus, a more accurate narrative of globalization experience in the decades prior to the World War I would read like this: A spreading technology revolution and a transportation breakthrough led first to a divergence of real wages and living standards between countries; the evolution of well-functioning global markets in goods and labor eventually brought about a convergence between nations; this factor price convergence, however, planted seeds for its own destruction because it created rising inequality in labor-scarce economies and falling inequality in labor-abundant economies. The voices of powerful interest groups who were hit hard by these globalization events were heard, generating a political backlash against immigration and trade.

A late-19th-century globalization backlash made a powerful contribution to interwar deglobalization. Is this history likely to repeat? Maybe not. After all, the migration from poor to rich countries today is a pretty trivial affair compared with the mass migrations of a century ago. And governments today have far more sophisticated ways to compensate losers than they had a century ago. Yet, history does supply a warning: a backlash against globalization can be found in our past, so it might reappear in our future.

Click to expand...

Gregster said:

Another 100m+ to figure out housing. It's the usually monthly amount. Sadly these fools will win another term

Click to expand...

KossaK said:

on fait quoi avec Islam?

Click to expand...

ticul said:

On fait quoi quand on pense que l'on "connais" quelqu'un qui a visiblement un problème de santé mentale (ex: fixation sur l'islam, l'homosexualité, le féminisme...), qu'on a l'impression que cette personne a besoin d'aide sinon elle risque de commettre des actes criminels graves?

Vous avez pas idée à quel point je peux être sérieux...

Click to expand...