Chacun ses opinions, c'est okAucun mais absolument aucun intérêt dans une RS7. C'est un modèle qui est "dépassé" en 2018.
Chacun ses opinions, c'est ok
Envoyé de mon Pixel XL en utilisant Tapatalk
Alfa Romeo or the M5 are not in the same league. I am replacing a GT-R with 565 hp, not a BMW 320 xDrive.
Aucun mais absolument aucun intérêt dans une RS7. C'est un modèle qui est "dépassé" en 2018.
Hahaha so your that lunatic dailies a cab in the winter! :laugh:
I vote R8 just for the insane reactions youd get from people seeing you daily an R8 when its -30 and blowing snow :laugh::laugh::laugh:
Oh, so you're concerned people can't tell the 600hp, $125 000 M5 apart from a 3 series. Gotcha. They're rather subdued on the appearance front nowadays. I admit coming from a Nissan it's a rather pedestrian proposition.
Let's get real here: Isn't there a part of you that feels you've plateau'ed considering yet another VAG v10?
I think it's time you step up to a GTC4 Lusso with a ski rack for your winter beater.
Not in the same league in terms of performance. I drive a Nissan as a daily driver... I guess you can appreciate I don't care about the brand.
Is this spec sheet/instrumented magazine test performance or butt dyno performance? Isn't the GT-R listed as 3.3 sec 0-60 vs 3.4 for the beemer?
From a daily driver perspective on our third world grade roads, how much does a fractions of a second matter on a sub 4 second 0-100 cars?
Pretty sure you can go from 0- to no licence in 10 seconds or less with any of these. They're all outrageously quick in my book.
To me this is more of a look/feel (IE N\A vs turbo) preference vs sheer performance thing at this point.
Everybody would..... Except Nick hahaI see. Would pick a hardtop version though.
For next winter, I am thinking about:
2018-2019 Audi R8 V10
or
2018-2019 Porsche 911 Turbo
Both cars have quite similar MSRPs and are AWD. Moreover, both cars can be easily driven on a daily basis as well as during winter time with proper tires. The new Urus is also a possible alternative but it is way more expensive and it is an SUV. After a Cayenne Turbo, a Range Rover Supercharged and an X6M, been there done that... SUVs are boring.
Alfa Romeo or the M5 are not in the same league. I am replacing a GT-R with 565 hp, not a BMW 320 xDrive.
Is this spec sheet/instrumented magazine test performance or butt dyno performance? Isn't the GT-R listed as 3.3 sec 0-60 vs 3.4 for the beemer?
From a daily driver perspective on our third world grade roads, how much does a fractions of a second matter on a sub 4 second 0-100 cars?
Pretty sure you can go from 0- to no licence in 10 seconds or less with any of these. They're all outrageously quick in my book.
To me this is more of a look/feel (IE N\A vs turbo) preference vs sheer performance thing at this point.
The GT-R is a 2.7s machine on the 0-60. Not to mention the lap times it can achieve on a race track. It has nothing to do with the butt dyno. Both cars are not in the same league performance-wise.
Before Xmas he drove it to the shop top down in a snowstorm with a santa hat on. Can vouch, was there
but we are talking about a winter beater and I would suppose that comfort and drivability through our awesome winters has to count for something?
...... I will have to learn how to multi quote for further discussion.