Florida school shooting

250Rocket said:
Also one was a rejection of a proposal to enact laws, the second is just a declaration... a statement.
Click to expand...

Enact what law? They are nowhere near enacting any laws, they voted down the idea of even having a discussion about it. They reject the idea of having a conversation about guns and declared porn a public health risk. That's what they did, don't try to spin it.
 
D_Accord said:
Almost had another one
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mass-s...high-school-thwarted-by-alert-security-guard/

It is crazy, especially being a student in the US...
Click to expand...

A spokesperson for the Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District told the publication the boy threatened to go home and bring back a gun following a disagreement with a teacher over his headphones, which are not allowed during class.
Click to expand...

You would think that teachers wouldn't try to mess with kids and their headphones, knowing they might be armed

:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
 
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/4/16418754/gun-control-washington-post

https://www.sciencealert.com/scientific-evidence-that-stricter-gun-control-works-saves-lives

Mic down...

tant qu'il y aura des estis de sans dessins avec des guns et ceux qui les défendent, il n'y aura pas d'amélioration

Même la NRA commence à se poser la question et a sentir l'eau chaude...

Ensuite il y a l'éducation de la société qui est en changement voir calisse de gros déclin de savoir vivre et d'intelligence...
 
*VR6* said:
You would think that teachers wouldn't try to mess with kids and their headphones, knowing they might be armed

:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
Click to expand...

well if the teacher had a gun in this he could have enforced the no headphone rule correctly
 
Ronin said:
thanks but I've read enough of "fuck you I like guns - part 2" non-senses from Americans with a fetishes issue.
Click to expand...

Right....

it's an open text from an ex-military making valid points about the the fact that there is really no need for the AR-15 for the general public...
 
on one report apparently a guy had already notified the FBI about this guy after he posted "im gonna be a professional school shooter" in a youtube comment. FBI response was "we couldnt track the person that owned that account"..wow what a fail.

Honestly the USA should be following us Canadians and getting rid of guns...i know its a big part of their culture and shit and they have a million gun stores..but its for the better lets be honest.
 
Ronin said:
thanks but I've read enough of "fuck you I like guns - part 2" non-senses from Americans with a fetishes issue.
Click to expand...

You should read it, it's actually full of common sens and well written.

He pretty much exactly sums up what I think and what the comedia Jim Jeffries explained :

There is absolutely no reason for owning AR15s/semi autos other than : I like guns (and there's nothing wrong about it).

I also like how he goes against each single pro-gun argument one after the other.
 
*VR6* said:
You should read it, it's actually full of common sens and well written.

He pretty much exactly sums up what I think and what the comedia Jim Jeffries explained :

There is absolutely no reason for owning AR15s/semi autos other than : Fuck you, I like guns.

I also like how he goes against each single pro-gun argument one after the other.
Click to expand...

Corrected, lol
 
sotam123 said:
on one report apparently a guy had already notified the FBI about this guy after he posted "im gonna be a professional school shooter" in a youtube comment. FBI response was "we couldnt track the person that owned that account"..wow what a fail.

Honestly the USA should be following us Canadians and getting rid of guns...i know its a big part of their culture and shit and they have a million gun stores..but its for the better lets be honest.
Click to expand...

Canada and Mexico should threaten USA with sanctions if they don't take actions, those guns end up across our borders, its our problem too... that would trigger soooo many people and would create a beautiful shit show.
 
Ronin said:
Canada and Mexico should threaten USA with sanctions if they don't take actions, those guns end up across our borders, its our problem too... that would trigger soooo many people and would create a beautiful shit show.
Click to expand...

That would actually be interesting...some sort of international gun policy...but forget about that with Trump that will never happen.

People on facebook are comparing guns to Knives and Cars and saying if they ban knives might aswell band everything...the only thing they dont realize is that a guns unique purpose is to Kill.

Atleast if they restricted all weapons and let people keep handguns that would be a lot better...you cant kill 17 people in a blast with a pistol. No one need a AR-15 or any sort of automatic weapon at home...
 
sotam123 said:
No one need a AR-15 or any sort of automatic weapon at home...
Click to expand...

An AR-15 is not automatic.

So you would restrict absolutely every firearm except handguns?

So it would be fine for me to have a .45ACP semi-auto handgun but not a .22 bolt action rifle??

If that is not what you meant, please tell me what firearms would you ban and which ones you would not


OK guys, let's say I'm cool with you and I'm in for a much stricter gun control in the US.

You can't copy-paste canada's gun laws because they make no fucking sense and it'll change absolutely nothing.

So what do you suggest?
 
You guys all forget one thing.

How are they going to disarm the more fanatical gun fanatics? The ones that keep guns PRECISELY for the purpose of defending themselves on the day when the government tries to take their guns away, will not simply hand over their weapons to the local authorities (or FBI or whoever the hell it is that will be in charge of collecting them.)

It will not simply be a "Today, US officials have decreed that all automatic firearms must be surrendered to Joe Shmoe at your local library - " and people will flock to the library with their weapons lowered ready to hand them in.

Will

Not

Happen.
 
dont start getting technical and making stupid comparisons..Im no gun expert but yes I do propose getting rid of all the guns and or restricting/banning most of them. dont come and say that you need guns for self defense...no one is coming to your house and shooting you randomly lets be honest.
 
lord_galathon said:
You guys all forget one thing.

How are they going to disarm the more fanatical gun fanatics? The ones that keep guns PRECISELY for the purpose of defending themselves on the day when the government tries to take their guns away, will not simply hand over their weapons to the local authorities (or FBI or whoever the hell it is that will be in charge of collecting them.)

It will not simply be a "Today, US officials have decreed that all automatic firearms must be surrendered to Joe Shmoe at your local library - " and people will flock to the library with their weapons lowered ready to hand them in.

Will

Not

Happen.
Click to expand...

obviously not but they can start restricting the purchase of them.
 
Guns used 2.5 million times a year in the US for self-defense, ask those people how do they feel about guns. Here you can't even fight people invading your own house without you going to court and jail for defending your property, self and your family. Your dumb fck ancestors gave up their right for self-preservation and now you're trying to tell the people in another country to give up theirs!?
 
sotam123 said:
dont start getting technical and making stupid comparisons..Im no gun expert but yes I do propose getting rid of all the guns and or restricting/banning most of them. dont come and say that you need guns for self defense...no one is coming to your house and shooting you randomly lets be honest.
Click to expand...

Dude.

You can't just say that and then go like "propose restricting/banning most of them" and not knowing which ones you keep and which ones you don't. I'm not trying to show you have 0 knowledge in guns, I'm trying to understand your thinking.

If you say "ban all guns" then cool. ALL guns is ALL guns. But if you say "most of them", you need to give me details.
 
lord_galathon said:
You guys all forget one thing.

How are they going to disarm the more fanatical gun fanatics? The ones that keep guns PRECISELY for the purpose of defending themselves on the day when the government tries to take their guns away, will not simply hand over their weapons to the local authorities (or FBI or whoever the hell it is that will be in charge of collecting them.)

It will not simply be a "Today, US officials have decreed that all automatic firearms must be surrendered to Joe Shmoe at your local library - " and people will flock to the library with their weapons lowered ready to hand them in.

Will

Not

Happen.
Click to expand...

People always bring up this ridiculous point of disarming and taking away your gun. has there ever been proposed legislation that actually would have had that effect?

CRNKY said:
Guns used 2.5 million times a year in the US for self-defense, ask those people how do they feel about guns. Here you can't even fight people invading your own house without you going to court and jail for defending your property, self and your family. Your dumb fck ancestors gave up their right for self-preservation and now you're trying to tell the people in another country to give up theirs!?
Click to expand...

Can you point to a court case where someone went to jail for self-defense?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top