4frnt.
Well-known member
My bad I was talking about the scenario where weapons would be banned, in which people wouldn’t be able to have «*legally owned*» firearms. Anyway having strict laws like in Canada would only help, citing differents incidents like Dawson doesn’t change the fact that it would help for all the other cases where the shooter had access to guns without the proper regulations. Their will always be exceptions where people will do everything to bypass the gates, but using these example for saying «*Hey, see, gun regulations won’t change nothing*» is really over simplifying the situation.
Like I already said a bunch of times, I'm a gun owner with both restricted and non-restricted firearms, and I fully support licensing and background checks to make sure people getting their hands on firearms are trained to do it safely and they don't have criminal records or mental illnesses. Owning a firearm is a privilege, and it comes at the price of being a model citizen. Canada laws regarding ownership of guns is perfectly fine, I just wish we wouldn't be restricted on bullshit laws like minimum barrel lengths, mag capacity, guns prohibited solely based on looks...