Le fameux "pay gap"... google donne des augmentations à des milliers d'hommes

Quick599

Well-known member
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...nalysis-leads-to-raises-for-thousands-of-men/

Google pay equity analysis leads to raises for thousands of men

A 2017 lawsuit accused Google of underpaying women.
TIMOTHY B. LEE - 3/4/2019, 5:20 PM

Google has given raises to thousands of men after an analysis of Google's pay structure found that the company would otherwise be underpaying those men relative to their peers, The New York Times reports. The analysis also led to raises for some women.

Google determines annual pay raises in a three-phase process. First, Google adjusts every employee's compensation based on standard factors like their location, seniority, and performance ratings. Managers can then seek additional discretionary raises for their best-performing employees.

Finally, Google performs a company-wide analysis to determine whether these raises are biased in terms of race or gender. If biases are detected, the disadvantaged workers are given additional raises to eliminate the discrepancies.

"We provided $9.7 million in adjustments to a total of 10,677 Googlers," the company said in a Monday blog post describing the results of the equity analysis.

"Men account for about 69 percent of the company's work force, but they received a disproportionately higher percentage of the money," the Times's Daisuke Wakabayashi writes. "Google said it was important to be consistent in following through on the findings of its analysis, even when the results were unexpected."

In recent years, there has been a lot of concern in Silicon Valley about the opposite problem: women being systematically underpaid relative to their male colleagues.

Of course, it's possible that Google's statistical analysis doesn't capture all factors that could be biasing pay structures against women. Google's analysis aimed to identify employees who are underpaid relative to others in the same job level. But what if the process of assigning employees to job levels is itself biased?

That's the premise of a 2017 lawsuit three women filed against Google in 2017.

"Google has channeled and segregated, and continues to channel and segregate, women on the basis of their sex into lower compensation levels and into less-compensated and less-favorable job ladders and levels," the lawsuit charged.

The Department of Labor has also raised concerns about Google's hiring and promotion practices. "We found systemic compensation disparities against women pretty much across the entire workforce," a Labor Department official testified in 2017.

Google has rejected those charges.

If Google managers were promoting men more quickly than equally qualified women, that discrepancy wouldn't necessarily get picked up by a statistical analysis that takes employees' job levels as a given.

Google says it plans to study the company's hiring and promotion processes to make sure that the company encourages gender equity.
 
ahahahahahah wwwoowww

avec tout les SJW qui travaillent là ça doit chier des taques à matin
 
If this is a legit thing.... oh man... incoming...SJWs claiming Google is the alt-right/Nazi/anti-feminist and trump supporter.
 
There are only two things I've been learning by these type of events. One is that an alarming number of people are usually completely clueless about what's going on and just go with what they think is going on, which is most of the time is completely different from the reality and it is always something negative. The other is that a rising number of people are generalizing using a few exceptions to create a fake victimhood, which then used to gain sympathy as a false victim, or to virtue signal by standing up for those nonexistent victims.
 
Bien, mon ami, qui a été nouvellement embauché par Google, va recevoir un ajustement à la hausse (si ce n'est pas justement le cas).
 
Ça me fait penser à une chose. Au sein de l'organisation de laquelle je suis employé, un gestionnaire a fait un speech citant le pay gap de Google en exemple et comme quoi on se doit mieux qu'eux et que c'était notre raison d'être.

J'étais songeur lorsqu'il a dit cela mais ça a permis, du coup, de rallier une partie de la troupe à la sensibilité de la "réalité professionnelle difficile "pour les femmes.
 
Ça me fait penser à une chose. Au sein de l'organisation de laquelle je suis employé, un gestionnaire a fait un speech citant le pay gap de Google en exemple et comme quoi on se doit mieux qu'eux et que c'était notre raison d'être.

J'étais songeur lorsqu'il a dit cela mais ça a permis, du coup, de rallier une partie de la troupe à la sensibilité de la "réalité professionnelle difficile "pour les femmes.

Tu devrais lui envoyer l'article par courriel et nous donner sa réponse. :D
 
Tu devrais lui envoyer l'article par courriel et nous donner sa réponse. :D

J'ai employé dans une autre organisation où les gestionnaires disaient faire mieux en tant d'équité. Ça finit que certaines femmes ont abusé de ce contexte pour déléguer davantage de leurs tâches à une autre personne, ou spécifiquement à des hommes (parce que 15lbs c'est trop lourd ou que la tâche était trop stressante). Ce qui est arrivé, des gens ont quitté. Et c'était surtout des hommes qualifiés qui en avaient marre de ce manège.

Donc, à chaque fois qu'une organisation s'en va SJW (parce que ces personnes en position de cadre visent des promotions), c'est souvent le contraire qui se produit à cause des abus d'une poignée.
 
The article is pretty terribly written.

Only the first sentence is about how the adjustment was favorable to some men in the company, the rest of the article goes the opposite way.

It's either intentionally structured this way because people stop reading after the first sentence past the headline, or it has been proofread by a drunk manatee.

In any case, it's the perfect format to get people to sling some shit at each other.
 
Back
Top