Canadian POLICE Are Tracking People’s “NEGATIVE BEHAVIOUR” In A “RISK” Database!!!

S1FAP said:
if this is/was true

I wouldn't expect a different answer from you since we know how much you love government
Click to expand...
lol i actually don't. but i wouldn't expect a different answer from you since i know how paranoid you are about being "caught by big brother".

...just kidding. it was mostly a troll post in another aluminum hat thread.
 
That guy is fkin annoying.

Besides, he’s making stuff up from misinterpreting articles and laws, always trying to steer everything towards his anti-law enforcement narrative.
 
Risk databases are nothing new. New technology allows new ways to collect the data.

Governments at large haven't "just started" doing this, and it doesn't mean that Canada is "like communist china" and it doesn't mean that dystopian movies are becoming a reality unless you want them to be in order to support your melodramatic posturing.

When a terrorist plan is dismantled by law enforcement before any attack happens, you can thank that database for it, but the funniest part of it is that you can then also thank that database for giving you subsequent arguments against mass immigration, since a significant proportion of high-risk people are immigrants.

You're biting the hand that feeds your own ideologies....but that's okay, I didn't expect that you would apply any sort of perspective to your habitual copypasta.
 
Pour passer sous le radar : eviter d ecrire sur les medias sociaux.Au college on appelait ca du mauvais esprit ...les plus allumes etaient conscients ...la masse dormait dans la conformity .
 
Byz said:
Pour passer sous le radar : eviter d ecrire sur les medias sociaux.Au college on appelait ca du mauvais esprit ...les plus allumes etaient conscients ...la masse dormait dans la conformity .
Click to expand...
la masse se concentre sur autre chose et s'en crisse un peu du gouvernement qui peuvent voir leur browser history. Pendant que la masse vie leur vies, les allumés sont dans les sous-sols de leur mères avec leur vidéos de conspiration gournemental et leur secret stash de midget porn full under the radar.
 
Tu sais que t'es winner quand ta source d'info c'tune tarte qui se film pour faire un video alarmiste qu'il veut monétiser sur youtube.

Parce que tout le monde sais que la sécurité publique se porte mieux quand les services sociaux, médicaux et policier n'échange aucune information.
 
@cUr@-TL said:
That guy is fkin annoying.

Besides, he’s making stuff up from misinterpreting articles and laws, always trying to steer everything towards his anti-law enforcement narrative.
Click to expand...
i'd say more an 'anti Authoritarian police state' there is a difference!



ThePapi said:
Risk databases are nothing new. New technology allows new ways to collect the data.

Governments at large haven't "just started" doing this, and it doesn't mean that Canada is "like communist china" and it doesn't mean that dystopian movies are becoming a reality unless you want them to be in order to support your melodramatic posturing.
Click to expand...
'my' like just me alone on my own - solely (lol)? so none of it's real & i'm dumb - got it :rolleyes:
edward snowden says hi

ThePapi said:
When a terrorist plan is dismantled by law enforcement before any attack happens, you can thank that database for it, but the funniest part of it is that you can then also thank that database for giving you subsequent arguments against mass immigration, since a significant proportion of high-risk people are immigrants.
Click to expand...
I dont think thats accurate at all - i'd say more informants & active keyword monitoring

ThePapi said:
You're biting the hand that feeds your own ideologies....but that's okay, I didn't expect that you would apply any sort of perspective to your habitual copypasta.
Click to expand...
uh huh cool opinion bro - if i watch the video and write some dissertation on it, it's TLDR & who has time anyways if i post something on Off Topic that i found even mildly interesting: huge problem apparently :p


detractors gonna detract
 
illuminance said:
uh huh cool opinion bro - if i watch the video and write some dissertation on it, it's TLDR & who has time anyways if i post something on Off Topic that i found even mildly interesting: huge problem apparently :p


detractors gonna detract
Click to expand...

Oh come on, you've been doing this kind of posting and running for years...

You either start a thread that includes a video or link to an article and then you sit back and watch people argue over it. You're not exactly known for your original content or additional perspective.

Do you have any thoughts on the HUB model? Can you think of a better way?
 
kahos said:
Oh come on, you've been doing this kind of posting and running for years...

You either start a thread that includes a video or link to an article and then you sit back and watch people argue over it. You're not exactly known for your original content or additional perspective.

Do you have any thoughts on the HUB model? Can you think of a better way?
Click to expand...

In 2012, the province of Saskatchewan saw the human service professions of policing, mental health, addictions, education, and corrections, among others, begin a fundamental shift in the way they do business. As some strategists claim (SPSS Enterprise Group, 2011), there was a demonstrable need for human service professionals not only to collaborate in their efforts, but together, also focus on immediate mitigation of risks that lead to harm, thereby improving community safety and well-being in the long run. Responding to this need, human service professionals in Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, developed and mobilized what has since become known nationally as The Hub Model (McFee & Taylor, 2014).

The Hub Model
The Hub Model represents a gathering of human service professionals who typically meet once or twice a week to detect acute elevations in complex client risk, share limited information necessary to identify client needs, and plan rapid interventions designed to mitigate those risks before harm occurs (Nilson, 2014). The Hub Model was designed as an upstream, interventionist approach to community safety and well-being that would allow human service providers from multiple sectors to collaborate around the improvement of client outcomes.

The original architects of the Hub Model (Mcfee & Taylor, 2014) explain that observations of community collaboration efforts in Glasgow, Scotland were confirmation that human service professionals from multiple disciplines could work together. Furthermore, past evidence from Boston’s Operation Ceasefire (Braga & Wesiburd, 2012) and other applications of the Pulling Levers Deterrence Strategy (Engel, 2013; McGarrell & Chermak, 2003; Papachristos, Meares & Fagon, 2007)—although quite different from Canada’s Hub Model—demonstrated that multiple human service professionals can reduce harm by mobilizing supports around individuals showing elevations in risk. These assurances, combined with the shared desire to “do better”, prompted community leaders in Prince Albert to launch the Hub Model in 2011 (McFee & Taylor, 2014).

In practice, the Hub Model facilitates the sharing of client information in a way that protects privacy. In fact, working within the confines of several privacy regulation frameworks, the Hub Model’s Four Filter Process has allowed collaborators to mitigate risk while upholding several key principles of information sharing within the context of community safety and well-being (Russell & Taylor, 2014). This has allowed human service providers to step beyond their traditional government silos and collaboratively find innovative ways to help clients like never before (Brown & Newberry, 2015).

There are essentially three parts to the Hub Model. The first is an internal process of risk detection that human service agencies adopt in their day-to-day service delivery. Where single agencies cannot address composite risk alone, they approach the second part of the Hub Model—the discussion process. This highly disciplined process allows human service professionals to systematically share client information while complying with their respective privacy regulation frameworks. The third part of the Hub Model involves a multi-sector intervention that consists of a largely non-scripted, custom-made opportunity to offer clients support in a non-coercive fashion. Following this intervention, or “door knock”, members of the intervention team report back to the larger table, and the group collectively determines if sufficient steps have been taken to close the discussion (Nilson, 2016a).

https://journalcswb.ca/index.php/cswb/article/view/30/51
Click to expand...
just so people know what you're talking about ...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top