** Official 2019-2020 Montreal Canadiens Thread **
- Thread starter Spaceman Spiff
- Start date
vladjet2000
New member
parce que c'est le CH qui a la bonne recette.
pas de séries, pas grave. on donne un extension à Bergevin même si son équipe est à chier, et elle le sera encore pendant des années.
à Toronto faire les séries n'est pas le but ultime. c'est acquis qu'ils s'y rendent. et si leur acquis n'est pas atteint, ça prend des changements pour s'assurer que ça se passe de la bonne manière, et pas d'ici 2025.
Montréal est à des années de Toronto, et pour la première fois de l'histoire, pour le pire!
-Mike-
Premium
je dis pas que je le ferais mais que l'idée est intéressante.
Envoyé de mon SM-N960W en utilisant Tapatalk
Le problème c'est Molson.
C'est un business man et ça semble évident qu'il se calice des résultats, en autant que le cash continu de rentrer.
Si c'était pas le cas, Bergevin serait parti depuis un boutte.
En attendant, on regarde un club qui fait pas les séries 80% du temps.
C'est un business man et ça semble évident qu'il se calice des résultats, en autant que le cash continu de rentrer.
Si c'était pas le cas, Bergevin serait parti depuis un boutte.
En attendant, on regarde un club qui fait pas les séries 80% du temps.
CuddlyJen
Multi Field Esssspert
Wait, what?
Since the 2004-2005 lockout, Leafs made playoffs 4 times out of 14.
They got eliminated in the first round 3 of those 4 times.
C'est du acquis ca....
vladjet2000
New member
on a besoin de quelqu'un pour jouer sur le PP...
ça fait longtemps qu'on parle de ça. tant que Molson est président, l'équipe n'ira nulle part, car il se mêle de l'équipe.
En!vy
Legacy Member
Hum I never disagreed to that lolll
That is actually accurate (you got something right!). Add the NMC to the NTC and NOW you can't be sent to waivers. But you can still be traded thanks to the M-NTC.
Your welcome.
Feel free to add me to YOUR ignore list if you dont want to be educated anymore
LMAO.
Wrongerino. NMC clause means you can`t be waived nor relegated to the minors or traded unless stipulated by a m-NTC.
Wrongerino. With a NTC you can be put on waiver as well as sent down. If it was the same as a NMC they would have given him a m-NTC + MNC. He doesn`t have waiver protection nor minor relegation protection, and so it has nothing to do with any NMC.
Technically correct. Not knowing what you are talking about renders your agreement or disagreement kinda moot.
Thanks for playing.
En!vy
Legacy Member
Molson has big things coming for the Habs and it's fans.
https://www.thechronicleherald.ca/s...add-vip-seating-as-fan-interest-wanes-414254/
CuddlyJen
Multi Field Esssspert
Wow you seriously have a reading skill issue..... i'll just leave it at that because you're a lost case lol
CuddlyJen
Multi Field Esssspert
Ahh what the heck I have time to waste ....
But seriously, I aint coming back on this because you are too retarded lol
But seriously, I aint coming back on this because you are too retarded lol
SilverViper
Premium
http://winnipeghockeytalk.com/nhl-news/difference-no-trade-no-movement-clauses-nhl-players:
No-Movement Clause (NMC) and No-Trade Clause (NTC) Eligibility:
Once a National Hockey League player has played seven years or reached twenty-seven years of age (Group 3 Free Agent Status) he is eligible to qualify for the NMC or NTC in his contract. These clauses can start mid-contract once the player reaches his Group 3 status. (example: in the fourth year of a seven-year deal)
There are basically two types of movement clauses NHL GMs need to pay attention to and/or work around with some players.
The No-Movement Clause:
A No-Movement Clause prohibits a team from moving a player by trade, waivers, or assigning that player to the minors without the player’s consent. This keeps the player with the pro team unless the player approves one of these moves. The player has the final say. Some players will often have a limited trade list here as well. A No-Movement Clause does not restrict a team from buying out or terminating a player’s contract.
The No-Trade Clause:
A No-Trade Clause is much less restrictive. It only places restrictions on movement by trade. A player with a No-Trade Clause cannot be traded by a team unless the player provides consent. A limited (partial or modified) No-Trade Clause is often less restrictive than a full No-Trade Clause and depends on the conditions negotiated in the player’s contracts. Often with these No-Trade Clauses, the player is asked to provide a list of teams to which he would be willing to be traded or NOT traded to. This list can change or fluctuate from season to season.
No-Movement Clause (NMC) and No-Trade Clause (NTC) Eligibility:
Once a National Hockey League player has played seven years or reached twenty-seven years of age (Group 3 Free Agent Status) he is eligible to qualify for the NMC or NTC in his contract. These clauses can start mid-contract once the player reaches his Group 3 status. (example: in the fourth year of a seven-year deal)
There are basically two types of movement clauses NHL GMs need to pay attention to and/or work around with some players.
The No-Movement Clause:
A No-Movement Clause prohibits a team from moving a player by trade, waivers, or assigning that player to the minors without the player’s consent. This keeps the player with the pro team unless the player approves one of these moves. The player has the final say. Some players will often have a limited trade list here as well. A No-Movement Clause does not restrict a team from buying out or terminating a player’s contract.
The No-Trade Clause:
A No-Trade Clause is much less restrictive. It only places restrictions on movement by trade. A player with a No-Trade Clause cannot be traded by a team unless the player provides consent. A limited (partial or modified) No-Trade Clause is often less restrictive than a full No-Trade Clause and depends on the conditions negotiated in the player’s contracts. Often with these No-Trade Clauses, the player is asked to provide a list of teams to which he would be willing to be traded or NOT traded to. This list can change or fluctuate from season to season.
SilverViper
Premium
For 2019-2020
MONTREAL CANADIENS
NO-TRADE CLAUSES
Karl Alzner (7-team no-trade list)
Ben Chiarot (10-team no-trade list)
NO-MOVEMENT CLAUSES
Jeff Petry (15-team no-trade list)
Carey Price
MONTREAL CANADIENS
NO-TRADE CLAUSES
Karl Alzner (7-team no-trade list)
Ben Chiarot (10-team no-trade list)
NO-MOVEMENT CLAUSES
Jeff Petry (15-team no-trade list)
Carey Price
vladjet2000
New member
je crois que ça ne marcherait pas, car il n'y a pas assez de place dans le rangs mineurs pour accomoder tous ces joueurs une fois qu'ils doivent commencer leur carrière pro.
"c'est acquis" est au présent. oui, les leafs étaient une équipe de mrd il y a 10 ans. il y a 10 ans le canadien faisait les séries régulièrement.
aujourd'hui, les dirrigeants de Toronto s'attendent à une équipe qui gagne une couple de rondes, pendant qu'ici, nous faisons le party si le Canadien finit 9e. c'est une histoire de 2 équipes qui s'en vont dans des directions oppossées.
En!vy
Legacy Member
Theres actually a better definition of this stuff over at Capfriendly under their CBA FAQ. But you can provide all the definitions you want, as I've already provided it all, and this person continues to troll so whatever. Par for the course pretty much, hasn't had an on topic post in the last 6 months just picking contrarion stances with LG or Grim or anyone that will give him the attention he craves. Probably not long for the site anyways so its just best to move on lol.
Rustedsleeper
Active member
Fuck get over it
Spaceman Spiff
Well-known member
Sa pas allure , il pense vraiment pouvoir le signer a cause de sa faveur lol , déjà le recrutement est horrible ta pas le luxe de faire cela
