Spaceman Spiff
Well-known member
Trump aussi a perdu le vote populaire en 2016Par contre au niveau stratégique, ils l'ont l'affaire. Réussir a se faire réélire en pedant le vote populaire. Fort, très très fort.
Mais pas très démocratique.
Trump aussi a perdu le vote populaire en 2016Par contre au niveau stratégique, ils l'ont l'affaire. Réussir a se faire réélire en pedant le vote populaire. Fort, très très fort.
Mais pas très démocratique.
No he doesn't, Trudeau's already came out and said he's not entering into a formal coalition in which he would integrate members of another party into the cabinet. If he had fewer seats maybe he'd have to but not right now, but he has just enough seats to seek out support for each individual bill he's going to submit and Yves-Francois Blanchette has made it very clear he will be supporting the government on a case by case basis based upon if it's good for Quebec.
Jagmeet did better than was expect and has more power than the NDP ever had, but the liberals and the NDP don't differ very much on policy points, so it's not like Jagmeet would be forcing Trudeau to do anything also the NDP is broke as fuck. They were already struggling this past election to get around and their fundraising isn't anywhere near as effective as the Cons and Libs, they won't be wanting to bring down the government.
Le problème en partant c'est que tu ne peux pas exporter de l'électricité 3-4 provinces plus loin. Les pertes de rendement sont trop élevées.
Il y a eu plein de groupes qui essaient justement d'empêcher l'exportation d'électricité en bloquant la construction de lignes à haute tension vers les États limitrophes.
That sounds very nice, but if he doesn't throw someone a bone, his government will be shot down every time he tries to pass it. he needs those pesky 15 votes.
The liberals want pharmacare, the ndp want pharmacare.
The liberals want to up to the threshold for the lowest taxation bracket effectively lowering taxes, the conservatives want to lower taxes.
The list goes on and on and on. It shapes the bill that they'll be presenting but nothing in the liberal platform was outrageously out of sync with either of their opponents of the right or the left.
You think jagmeet/scheer/blanchette is going to send us back into an election on a bill that they actually support? They'd have to own that during a campaign.
Sur le Pipeline dans l'ouest , PCC va voter avec les Libéraux
Sur le Pharmacare , NPD va voter avec les Libéraux
Sur le ban des armes d'assault , NPD/Bloc va voter avec les Libéraux
Sur le scandale SNC lavalin et le Bloc va voter avec les Libéraux
Dépôt d'un Budget dépensier , le NPD va voter avec les Libéraux
les conservateurs ne veulent pas retourner en élection
le NPD même chose
ça va être le gouvernement minoritaire qui va durer le plus longtemps ..
Je ne crois pas que le Bloc va voter pour la restriction des armes...
le vote populaire c'est juste une statistique avancé donc on s'en fou. Notre systeme est basé sur une personne, un vote dans une circonscription
you're right about that. they agree on things, but that doesn't mean that they will all vote the same way. this is a power struggle. if Trudeau doesn't do something to make sure those 15 seats are accounted for, he might not pass a single law.
Also, his government has to be approved by a 170 majority. why would anyone approve his ministers? Trudeau is 15 seats short and noobody will give them up for free. Trudeau has to entice some people, whether the bloc but most likely the NDP for those 15 seats, otherwise he's done as a PM.
Je ne crois pas que le Bloc va voter pour la restriction des armes...
His government doesn't need to be approved, he has to gain the trust of the house through the throne speech which essentially outlines the parliamentary objectives for that session of parliament. No one approves the cabinet and his ministerial appointments in our parliamentary system. The cabinet is formed entirely at the discretion of the PM and no one else.
Parliament isn't only about political power, it's purpose is to also pass legislation. You want power in order to introduce and pass legislation you support, unless he puts batshit crazy stuff in the throne speech it'll have enough legislation that the Bloc/NDP and probably even the conservatives (even though they'll vote against is just for the optics) want done to gain support. The only "enticement" he needs to do in the immediate future is to include stuff the NDP/Bloc want done in the throne speech and as I've outlined before there is enough of that to gain support.
He's not getting voted down at the throne speech nor is he going to need to make any meaningful concessions in order to gain the confidence of the house.
Je ne crois pas que le Bloc va voter pour la restriction des armes...