just curious, would anyone here vote for like a normal person that runs on the simple platform of
- being surrounded by very competent people in their domain, meaning get the best no matter what (within basic ethical/legal limits, but not be shy of suggesting those limits might be pushed a little bit to get the best)
- taking decisions based on feedback from the above experts and what the population wants
- be very transparent about what is suggested by the experts (high level)
versus
what everyone wants
versus
what's possible
and propose a few solutions that takes that into account and let people vote on it (yes implement an online secure voting system, yes it's possible)
- would not be afraid to change what doesn't work and on the other hand would not change what works for the sake of changing it
- besides having education/heatlh/security as priorities
- would work with environmentalists to find a middle ground, but NOT to the detriment of our other priorities
- keep helping others around the planet, but not by dumping a bunch of money to organisations/goverments/etc... find innovating ways to help people directly, rather than just giving money, we could maybe try to fix some of our own employment issues for some people in some special contexts, by paying them for jobs that would result in helping others around the world.... anyway that would come from those experts lol...