Fermez les frontières, un nouveau virus apparaît: La COVID-19

Le problème est que personne ne sait combien de temps l’immunité perdure dans le temps.

Certains disent 6-8 semaines et d’autres disent 6 mois etc

Si c’était si court que ça on serait plein de rapports de monde qui ont pogné le Covid 2-3 fois et non, les cas qui sont 'testé clean' pis qui testent positif 2-3 jours après ça compte pas.
 
A reminder that this is a virus with a 99.98% chance of survival. It's complete fucking insanity that fear porn about cases drowns out this fact.
 
Another sad truth is that herd immunity was not reached and is decreasing rapidly, according to many studies.

Long, but...

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31483-5/fulltext

I read the study you posted. It doesn't say that herd immunity is decreasing.

"Seroprevalence was close to 90% after 14 days since a positive PCR test, which is consistent with a recent study concluding that SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies are detected in more than 90% of infected people 2 weeks after symptom onset,and the recently reported 99% of antibody response among confirmed COVID-19 cases.For the few patients who do not develop antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, it is unknown whether they are susceptible to reinfection.Prevalence in those participants reporting negative PCR was higher than in those without a PCR test, which might be explained by delayed PCR testing that yields a negative result or by imperfect sensitivity of PCR tests."

But of course if only 5% of population was affected and developed anti-bodies, it's far from herd immunity...

As for catching it twice it's still unknown because frankly, and as I said previously, the test commonly used (swab) isn't the best way to tell if someone actually HAS CV19. It just means the CV19 virus or viral charge is present in someone's sinuses.

https://www.express.co.uk/life-styl...ection-can-you-get-coronavirus-twice-covid-19

Dr. Robert Glatter, an emergency physician at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City said: "The truth is that we don’t exactly understand the dynamics of how people who test negative after initial infection end up testing positive again. We need more studies to clarify this observed phenomenon."

Even if we were to be immune for 6-8 months, then it's STUPID to "flatten the curve" because all you're really doing is spreading the virus for longer across time. As an example, if someone caught CV19 in March, and the virus is still circulating in December (8 months) then it's possible they would catch it again.

On the other hand, if everyone caught the virus and 99% fought it off as statistically proven by the ~1% death rate in Canada, then in 8 months it might be all over - like in Sweden - and even if we're not immune forever, once the virus is gone well there's nothing left to catch is there?

I still think that this pandemic while deadly for vulnerable people, should've been handled differently across the board.

People argue over the long term effects of getting CV19 on the lungs, organs, etc. Right. So like every other flu no?
 
I thought Elon Musk was a snakeoil salesman so why listen to what he says? It’s probably just to help him in his child traficking tunnels under LA.
 
A reminder that this is a virus with a 99.98% chance of survival. It's complete fucking insanity that fear porn about cases drowns out this fact.

That's 99.98% with containment measures. The mortality rate is a lot higher if you just let it loose amongst the population.
 
Je viens de le crisser sur "Ignore" aussi

C'est quand même weak sauce de la part des mods de le laissé polluer toute les threads avec les même osties de message over & over.
 
Je viens de le crisser sur "Ignore" aussi

C'est quand même weak sauce de la part des mods de le laissé polluer toute les threads avec les même osties de message over & over.
C'est assurément pour du click/trafic

N'importe quelle autre tache de même serait bannie
 
That's 99.98% with containment measures. The mortality rate is a lot higher if you just let it loose amongst the population.

And how do you figure that? It's a percentage, not an absolute number. The death rate will be higher overall yes, as in there will be more vulnerable people dying - however nothing says we can't protect ONLY the vulnerable.

By that I mean confine the vulnerable, make them stay home order stuff have it delivered.

It would be over by now...
 
And how do you figure that? It's a percentage, not an absolute number. The death rate will be higher overall yes, as in there will be more vulnerable people dying - however nothing says we can't protect ONLY the vulnerable.

By that I mean confine the vulnerable, make them stay home order stuff have it delivered.

It would be over by now...

Just an example, you would probably 1/2 the workforce for daycares, retail stores, garages...
 
That's 99.98% with containment measures. The mortality rate is a lot higher if you just let it loose amongst the population.

Huh? If one person in a room has the virus, his chance of survival is 99.98%. If 10 people in a room have the virus, their chance of survival is still 99.98%.
 
Just an example, you would probably 1/2 the workforce for daycares, retail stores, garages...

So nothing new... Half the workforce is still on the federal 2000$/month plan. We are literally struggling to find people to come work in our packaging department because they'd rather get 2000$/month staying home playing videogames and watching Netflix than get up in the morning and come to work for an extra 2$ an hour.

That applies to all low but not quite minimum wage personnel. From hairdressers and barbers to mechanics and daycare educatrices.

Who went back to work? The people that didn't really stop and/or that make 20+$/hour.

And now a few anecdotal examples from MR's family/friends who went back to work despite making less than 2000$/month while working, in 3, 2, 1...
 
lol la gang de cry baby qui utilise la ignored list

ça me fait penser au retard avec leur ''safe space''

pas capable de juste skip le post

weak
 
Back
Top