If BLM is largely a protest to bring attention to the mistreatment of african-americans in the US that's gone on for centuries and continue to be ignored by many, when you finally find yourself in a moment where attention is being paid to the problem and a conversation is happening to say that "All lives matter" is just another way of sweeping the problem under the rug.
A crappy analogy: Someone is asked to give a eulogy and instead of speaking about the deceased they talk about the thousands every year that die of cancer.
Factual sure and not offensive on its own, but in the context maybe just maybe it is offensive if that happens to be someone you cared for?
If you look at BLM as just the culmination of ignoring black people and the problems they face, then responding to a statement about black lives mattering with an all lives matter comment is just the perpetuation of the problem.
And here we are in 2020, dismissing reality (all lives matter) on account of perceptions so it can better fit some progressive narrative of manufactured outrage at just about everything. This whole twitter drama was a non event.
It's reductive and self-serving to bring this back to a race thing. If anything, it's a classic misdirection away from the actual problems: poverty, healthcare, inequality and a flawed justice system (war on drugs, for profit prisons, etc) Does race play a part in this? Yes, is it the biggest single factor? I doubt it (but it's not PC to ponder that kind of things anymore)
It would be nearly as much of a system failure if a "marginal" white guy (w/ similar background) died but we wouldn't be looking for Pro NBA players to tell us how mad and hurtful they find this to be.
We wouldn't be shopping this to some interest groups that use race as a defining feature: "Hey this is shitty, do you guys want to martyr this dude and run with it?"
Race is a component at the macro level, but it shouldn't turn into the biggest single factor.
The governments handled this pretty well at the onset. All levels of government promptly denounced the actions of that officer / shitty human being and initiated investigations.
They fired all 4 a little bit faster than you'd expect these processes to take to appease the crowds. Body cameras were worn and footage secured, the investigation was conducted and the perpetrator got arrested / charged. How is this not accountability? It was much better than the initial Ahmaud Arbery investigation...
Does it match up to the mob's idea of justice? No, but it was a fairly balanced initial approach. The other 3 have / are about to get charged as well.
They've gotten themselves so amped up that things are happening now that undermines the cause and derails conversations.
It was like people using this as an excuse to play the martyr card (with very limited information) about the death in Toronto. Woman going through a Mental Health episodes blockades herself on a balcony and dies. First reaction? Blame police for Murder? We all know they secretly want to throw colored people off balconies!"
How about you let the independent organisation uncover what happens before manning the barricades. "Oh, she's christian, she wouldn't kill herself." I get Denial, but it doesn't need to become the whole narrative.
The whole knee jerk reaction to everything is counter productive. This just leads to division, fatigue and tribalism. All of which are counter-productive to support for reforms.
Last edited: