Joe Biden is now president: what does it mean for you?
- Thread starter goshko
- Start date
Spaceman Spiff
Well-known member
Fake news. The articles are one year-old.
Yesterday, the country saw the most covid deaths in a single day.
Daily deaths in Michigan are still higher than when the indoor dining ban went into effect.
This is clearly not about science.
Last edited:
KossaK
Active member
https://www.journaldemontreal.com/2021/01/22/comment-deradicaliser-40-millions-damericains
DENISE BOMBARDIER turbo cunt.
Fait exactment l inverse ce uelle dit et le monde sera meilleur.
DENISE BOMBARDIER turbo cunt.
Fait exactment l inverse ce uelle dit et le monde sera meilleur.
KossaK
Active member
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...s-path-to-the-white-house?srnd=premium-canada
‘Dark Money’ Helped Pave Joe Biden’s Path to the White House
Joe Biden benefited from a record-breaking amount of donations from anonymous donors to outside groups backing him, meaning the public will never have a full accounting of who helped him win the White House.
Biden’s winning campaign was backed by $145 million in so-called dark money donations, a type of fundraising Democrats have decried for years. Those fundraising streams augmented Biden’s $1.5 billion haul, in itself a record for a challenger to an incumbent president.
That amount of dark money dwarfs the $28.4 million spent on behalf of his rival, former President Donald Trump. And it tops the previous record of $113 million in anonymous donations backing Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney in 2012.
Democrats have said they want to ban dark money as uniquely corrupting, since it allows supporters to quietly back a candidate without scrutiny. Yet in their effort to defeat Trump in 2020, they embraced it.
For example, Priorities USA Action Fund, the super political action committee that Biden designated as his preferred vehicle for outside spending, used $26 million in funds originally donated to its nonprofit arm, called Priorities USA, to back Biden. The donors of that money do not have to be disclosed.
The Mighty Money (Almost $4 Billion) of Campaign 2020: QuickTake
Guy Cecil, the chairman of Priorities USA, was unapologetic. “We weren’t going to unilaterally disarm against Trump and the right- wing forces that enabled him,” he said in a statement.
Campaign finance laws, in theory, are supposed to limit the influence big money has over politicians. But the system has gaping loopholes, which groups backing Biden and other candidates, have exploited.
“He benefited from it,” said Larry Noble, a former general counsel at the Federal Election Commission.
A Biden spokesman didn’t respond to attempts to seek comment.
His campaign called for banning some types of nonprofits from spending money to influence elections and requiring that any organization spending more than $10,000 to influence elections to register with the FEC and disclose its donors.
‘Dark Money’ Helped Pave Joe Biden’s Path to the White House
Joe Biden benefited from a record-breaking amount of donations from anonymous donors to outside groups backing him, meaning the public will never have a full accounting of who helped him win the White House.
Biden’s winning campaign was backed by $145 million in so-called dark money donations, a type of fundraising Democrats have decried for years. Those fundraising streams augmented Biden’s $1.5 billion haul, in itself a record for a challenger to an incumbent president.
That amount of dark money dwarfs the $28.4 million spent on behalf of his rival, former President Donald Trump. And it tops the previous record of $113 million in anonymous donations backing Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney in 2012.
Democrats have said they want to ban dark money as uniquely corrupting, since it allows supporters to quietly back a candidate without scrutiny. Yet in their effort to defeat Trump in 2020, they embraced it.
For example, Priorities USA Action Fund, the super political action committee that Biden designated as his preferred vehicle for outside spending, used $26 million in funds originally donated to its nonprofit arm, called Priorities USA, to back Biden. The donors of that money do not have to be disclosed.
The Mighty Money (Almost $4 Billion) of Campaign 2020: QuickTake
Guy Cecil, the chairman of Priorities USA, was unapologetic. “We weren’t going to unilaterally disarm against Trump and the right- wing forces that enabled him,” he said in a statement.
Campaign finance laws, in theory, are supposed to limit the influence big money has over politicians. But the system has gaping loopholes, which groups backing Biden and other candidates, have exploited.
“He benefited from it,” said Larry Noble, a former general counsel at the Federal Election Commission.
A Biden spokesman didn’t respond to attempts to seek comment.
His campaign called for banning some types of nonprofits from spending money to influence elections and requiring that any organization spending more than $10,000 to influence elections to register with the FEC and disclose its donors.
Non, non.
L'amérique était forte avec Trump. La par magie ils sont devenu faible (aucun lien avec la pandémie) et cet evenement la en est la preuve.
KerplunK
New member
Même le réseau de nouvelles VOA l’avait rapporté il y a quelques mois.
Qu’est-ce qui est pire: Omokocha pas conscient qu’il poste de quoi de faux sans fact checker avant, ou volontairement poster des fake news pour salir le nouveau président ?
Dans les 2 cas, c’est pathétique et risible comme comportement.
Qu’est-ce qui est pire: Omokocha pas conscient qu’il poste de quoi de faux sans fact checker avant, ou volontairement poster des fake news pour salir le nouveau président ?
Dans les 2 cas, c’est pathétique et risible comme comportement.
En quoi exactement la nouvelle est fausse?
KossaK
Active member
quoi tu va faire quand les probleme que tu accusai trump sont les meme avec Binden.
et 2 jour
-isuline et apinephrine vient monter
-un nouveau conflic au middle east les usa vont aller impliquer balls deep.
Où ça le nouveau conflit au Moyen-Orient?
Biden est 100% dédié au vaccin et au contrôle de la pandémie sur son territoire. En ce moment, il en a rien à crisser de ce qui se passe au Moyen-Orient.
NemesisBob
Member
Here is the strategy..
October 15
January 22
October 15
January 22
Ok parce que le dude ça fait 5 jours qui est en poste et les cas devraient miraculeusement tous être en baisse ou sous contrôle après avoir succédé un Président qui à fait sweet fuck all pour contrôler le spread au cours des 10 derniers mois?
C’est aussi ridicule comme affirmation que de blâmer Trump après sa première semaine au bureau Oval pour le flux d’immigration illégal qui n’a pas été contrôlé / baissé.
C’est aussi ridicule comme affirmation que de blâmer Trump après sa première semaine au bureau Oval pour le flux d’immigration illégal qui n’a pas été contrôlé / baissé.
KerplunK
New member
Essaie pas de jouer à l’innocent. Tu insinues qu’au 3ieme jour de Biden les chinois deviennent plus agressifs, en omettant de spécifier qu’ils font la même chose depuis des mois même sous Trump. Le problème n’est pas à savoir si la nouvelle est fausse ou pas, le problème c’est de rapporter une nouvelle à moitié à un timing précis pour pousser ton agenda. Et ça, comme j’ai dis, c’est crissement pathétique. Tu agis EXACTEMENT de la façon dont tu dénonces les méchants médias.
KerplunK
New member
Ce que toi et tes semblables ne sont pas capables de comprendre c’est qu’il n’y a pas de méchant pi de gentil comme dans un film. Je suis pas plus un partisan de Biden que de Trump, je méprise les US pour leur culture du vide et leur manque d’intelligence généralisée. Mais toi l’imbécile tu penses parce qu’il y a un nouveau président, ça va changer quoi que ce soit. La seule différence c’est que les US vont un peu moins faire rire d’eux autres partout dans le monde.
