rollingsound
New member
Canada: I don't want to go back to my kitchen job, it's killing me.
Afghanistan: Yes, grabbing onto this plane's landing gear like Tom Cruise seems like a rational risk/reward tradeoff given my circumstances.
L'Afghanistan reviens a l'époque de l'homme de cromagnon...
- Thread starter -Mike-
- Start date
Canada: I don't want to go back to my kitchen job, it's killing me.
Afghanistan: Yes, grabbing onto this plane's landing gear like Tom Cruise seems like a rational risk/reward tradeoff given my circumstances.
Dibbs
Active member
yes I am aware.
I'm just saying in terms of where some of the US nuclear weapons are deployed in the world, this once probably feels most at risk. Erdogan could overturn the NATO base there.
Spaceman Spiff
Well-known member
The US nukes in Turkey are protected by very well armed soldiers in a hardened bunker and have encrypted codes. Russian tactical nukes are protected by three drunk russian soldiers and stored in a garden shed.
Broody
Well-known member
Pas de vols, fusillé si tu traverses la frontière, je trouve ça efficace comme plan Covid.
ils sourient devant la video avec leur chummy assis sur les ailes des avions avant de se faire catapulter a 100pi dans les airs à 700km/h.
C'est une belle évolution après les videos des crazy arabs driftings.
On voit que la vie humaine n'a pas vraiment de valeur là-bas lol
C'est une belle évolution après les videos des crazy arabs driftings.
On voit que la vie humaine n'a pas vraiment de valeur là-bas lol
Gregster
Legacy Member
And have the full weight of NATO or USA on you? He's not that stupid, neither are his armed forces. USA would launch a strike mission to destroyed the cache of weapons before other forces would get near them. There is also the likelihood that the USA has the detonators in their possession anyways
Sent from my EML-L09 using Tapatalk
Gregster
Legacy Member
Russian systems are mostly mobile anyways. There is big non sense a
How after the curtain fell all these nuclear weapons would be on the market. If some did get stolen they would have been used by now. This just goes to show you it's not like in the movies where you can build your own in the a shed.
Sent from my EML-L09 using Tapatalk
lord_galathon
Well-known member
McGyver using the Islamic robe as a canopy to glide down safely.
Last edited:
Dibbs
Active member
lol for some reason makes me think of goldeneye on N64
For tactical nukes there's quite an advantage using them. litteraly would turn the wave in the favor of the army using them.
Hasn't stopped them before.... [btw. I wasn't talking about Afghanistan in regards to the use of tactical nuclear weapons, in regards to that I was just joking about dropping a stategic nuclear bomb... on Afghanistan and it went on about their advantage and if they would be used by the russians in a conventional war and losing (again not about afghanistan here)]
If they're stuck in a war they can't win, yes the ruskies will use them... that being said, I agree they're smarter than that and they wont get in a conventional war they can't win, so yes in the end chances are extremly slim of them being used, but much higher than the strategical ones...
Gregster
Legacy Member
The Soviets doctrine at the time was a large scale ground invasion using tanks and quickly gain ground to hold airports or bases. Nobody wants to use nukes because they destroy everything that could be useful for you. Also you risk wiping out your own troops. In reality they would never be used even small low yield tactical weapons.
Sent from my EML-L09 using Tapatalk
Lmao i sincerely hope you didn't buy into Global times, CGTN bullshit propaganda.
KossaK
Active member
we watch a lot of Fleet movement from the us into the pacific and indan sea.
china know the US. still have 5 years behind in order for the new ships.
But still. the us focus most of the actual fleet close to our Chinese friends.
If china want to gain something is now. Because in 5 or 10 years the new cruiser and drones and planes will be build.
I dont know if this ColdWar will be as long at the first. But we are close to a Cuban Missile crisis level of tension.
china know the US. still have 5 years behind in order for the new ships.
But still. the us focus most of the actual fleet close to our Chinese friends.
If china want to gain something is now. Because in 5 or 10 years the new cruiser and drones and planes will be build.
I dont know if this ColdWar will be as long at the first. But we are close to a Cuban Missile crisis level of tension.
What I'm saying is if China moves on Taiwan, who will stop them? The United States and the Europeans will "strongly condemn" from their Twitter accounts and that will be it. The United States is a paper tiger, nothing more, they have the fanciest toys but have no steel in their spines.
bulshit, être la Chine je ne serais pas content du retrait des USA en Afghanistan. Les USA ont quand même montré qu'il pouvait mener une guerre pendant 20 ans, 20 ans ce n'est pas rien. Le pays est détruit et digne du moyen âge en terme de capacité offensive, il ne représenteront plus aucune menace pour les 20 prochaines années, comme le Vietnam qui après 50 ans n'est toujours par remis de ses guerres successivent contre le colonisateur français puis les USA.
Aucune armée moderne ne peut mener plusieurs guerre en même temps car une armée moderne est couteuse. En ce moment l'armée américaine est libre, bien financée et bien équipée, ils peuvent plus aisément réallouer des ressources vers Taiwan. Plus aisément justifier une intervention n'étant pas occuper ailleurs. Les USA n'accepteront jamais que la Chine envahisse Taiwan, les chinois ont en masse d'ennemi, ils sont détesté par les UK, Allemagne et en guerre commerciale contre l'Australie.
Gregster
Legacy Member
Lol nowhere near levels of Cuban Missile crisis I mean "USA puts strike missiles in Europe and then cries when Russia does the same crisis"
Sent from my EML-L09 using Tapatalk
ok, I agree in regards to Afghanistan, but if they get in a war with Europe over Ukraine (it won't happen I know), and they start losing that conventional war, what do you think they'll do? Surrender? Call it quit and launch all strategical nuclear weapons against europe/states so it would end up pretty much on all being destroyed on the planet? Or use the low yield tactical nuclear weapons they have to quickly take out millitary targets and defense systems and than offer a "truce".... with some conditions on both sides...