This just comes off as some nut job tea party folks looking to up their national recognition in order to run for office. I wonder how many birth certificates from that time they had to go through in order to find one they thought had enough similarities that could push their nut job theories through.
The 1st 5 points of forgery: omg a typewriter produced consistent typographie? How unexpected.
The next 2: Date stamps are of the same angle, jesus christ the box is the size of nothing, how many different angles can you possibly produce if you want to stay within the lines.
If you want to be credible go pull up 100, let's say even as few as 50 birth certificats from the same period and show me that these "forgeries" aren't consistent across other documents. Even better pull up the birth certificate from the same day at the same hospital and show me the one's before and after Obama's are different.
Just from jumping through the video the amount of time he spends establishing credibility and establishing a narrative (we tracked down the manufacturer of the safety paper, it can totally be fabricated) just reeks of overconfident police work. The kind of shit that get's people framed and innocent people jailed.
If you have 1h30 to spare, here are podcasts about how forensic science isn't full proof.
the TLDL of the podcast: none of the shit you see on CSI exist, their is no magical computers that provides 100 matches, the best it can do is narrow down a field and then an expert has to confirm a match. Same thing with DNA evidence and you know what? They make mistakes, and can have their results influenced providing false confirmations.
https://gimletmedia.com/episode/9-forensic-science/
https://gimletmedia.com/episode/10-dna-and-the-smell-of-death/