Store raid

pas mal tout le monde s'en sacre du BLM c'est juste de l'hypocrésie
-les organisations on pas le choix d'appuyer et de supporter le BLM, c'est une question d'éthique social, s'ils ne le font pas ils peuvent etre vu comme étant pas sensible au yeux des gens et ainsi perdre du $$$
-les influenceurs doivent suivre des tendances cool pour être en haut de la pyramide et généré des vues = $$$$
 
En 2012 les manifestations avaient commencé à cause d'une hausse annoncée des frais de scolarité. Ça s'était élargi à tous ceux qui voulaient exprimer leur écoeurantite envers le gouvernement. C'est probablement ce qui est en train de se passer aux États-Unis mais avec plus de violence.
 
Effectivement beau niaisage aujourd'hui avec l'affaire des posts noirs.. le pire c'est que si l'entreprise/artistes/personnalité embarque pas dans le moule, elle se fait reprocher d'être raciste.

Ça pis thought and prayer, ça n'a jamais été grand monde.
 
J’ai changé de poste à matin quand j’ai entendu Isabelle Racicot à Salut Bonjour dire que c’est la faute des médias pis le manque de noirs à la télé. Esti qu’est cringe ste femme la c’est pas possible. J’suis le plus grand militant auprès de ma famille pis de mes amis sur le quétainisme des “artistes” québécois.

Selon son raisonnement le fait qu'il n'y ait presque pas de ratons laveurs a la television ca causerait des invasion de ratons laveurs qui vont saccager des magasins et voler des kicks.
 
How to end the the rioting without deploying the army, give amnesty to anyone defending their property. Trump lays out that he does not condone vigilantism, and defacing the front of your establishment is still not grounds, however if somebody steps inside your home or business he'll issue a presidential pardon or at least apply pressure to have the state charges dropped if lefty local governments prosecute. We've already seen a few cases exactly like this, they didn't even prosecute. This would apply even if you shoot them in the head while on the ground, again, so long as they've breached the perimeter of your building and have entered.

Leftist would go apeshit on this but essentially that's already the law of the land (castle doctrine), he'd just be highlighting it an reassuring people he's got their backs if some shithead local politician wants to make an example of them for hurting their voter base.
 
How to end the the rioting without deploying the army, give amnesty to anyone defending their property. Trump lays out that he does not condone vigilantism, and defacing the front of your establishment is still not grounds, however if somebody steps inside your home or business he'll issue a presidential pardon or at least apply pressure to have the state charges dropped if lefty local governments prosecute. We've already seen a few cases exactly like this, they didn't even prosecute. This would apply even if you shoot them in the head while on the ground, again, so long as they've breached the perimeter of your building and have entered.

Leftist would go apeshit on this but essentially that's already the law of the land (castle doctrine), he'd just be highlighting it an reassuring people he's got their backs if some shithead local politician wants to make an example of them for hurting their voter base.

This doesn't carry much weight if by the time these go to court there's a good chance he won't be around.

Protection of property as carte blanche to use lethal force would be one bad precedent. I'd settle for open season on looters with paintball guns. You get marked, you go cool off in jail.

Besides, the states would not take kindly to the federal dropping in and "changing the rules". The federal taking an ever bigger place in "local issues" is anathema to the republican core ideas. The states administer their own justice systems.
 
Back
Top