Yeah, because civilians, especially women and kids casually walk around with rocket launchers on their shoulders
Can you show me one single instance where I conflated military and civilian casualties?
It should be easy since you claim it’s a “tactic regularly used” by me.
Oh wait, YOU’RE the one deliberately LYING in a failed attempt to justify genocide.
I proved this time and time again in my very few posts in this thread.
Another typical zionist move: accuse others of what you’re guilty of.
I didn’t batch civilians and militants in the Gaza numbers. The only entity claiming 60-70% ratio is the IDF itself. Such a credible, unbiased source LOL. Most sources agree that 60-70% are WOMEN and KIDS. With total civilian figures at 90%.
You’re a compulsive liar.
At this point it’s just funny to see how many lies you’ll manage to fit in a single post
Nadim 323Ci: Can you show me one single instance where I conflated military and civilian casualties?
Yes, I can.
Evox09: And yet only 30,000 people have died in an area with 5,500 people per square kilometers with 20K bombings?
Nadim 323Ci: I’m seeing significantly greater numbers for civilians casualties in Gaza than you claim. We’re talking 2-3 times more.
I said 30,000 people have died. That's a combined number. You referenced it as a CIVILIAN number and said that you're "seeing" 2x to 3x that number. Implying 60,000 to 90,000 civilian casualties.
Oh wait, YOU’RE the one deliberately LYING in a failed attempt to justify genocide.
Stop with your bullshit. You can't have it both ways.
Rwanda: 100 days,
800,000 dead. = Genocide..
Population density:
255/sq km
Location area: 26,338
Perpetrators: men on foot
Equipment: machetes and AK47s.
Fighting force size at peak: 200,000
Method: Stabbing, shooting
Gaza: 180 days,
30,000 dead (22,00 confirmed) = genocide?
Population density:
5,500/sq km
Location area: 365 sq km
Perpetrators: Israeli Military
Equipment: Battle Tanks, APC, Artillery, Bomber jets, Drones.
Fighting for size at peak: 529,000 (includes 360,000) deployed reservists
Method: Bombing (20k + bombs), shooting, air strikes, artillery rounds.
Just one question:
Explain how the most powerful and advanced group ever to commit "genocide", has only managed to kill 30,000 people in 180 days, in the easiest location EVER to commit a genocide?
The only entity claiming 60-70% ratio is the IDF itself. Such a credible, unbiased source LOL. Most sources agree that 60-70% are WOMEN and KIDS. With total civilian figures at 90%.
There are 2 direct sources of data. Hamas ministry of health & the IDF.
All analysis depend on those sources.
Hamas reports ALL CASULATIES as civilian and admitted that of their 33,091 palestinian fatalities, 11,371 came from incomplete data, I.E. NO CONFIRMATION. Prior to this, they claimed that 15,000 fatalities in the 33,091 count came from "reliable media sources" but they can't say who.. I.E. bullshit.
Total CONFIRMED deaths: 21,720. SOURCE: GAZA MINISTRY OF HEALTH
https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2024/0...th-ministry-admits-to-flaws-in-casualty-data/
Israel claim 13,000 are Hamas or PIJ, but let's ignore that for a moment.
https://www.reuters.com/world/middl...ve-hit-hamas-rafah-scale-back-war-2024-02-19/HAMAS CLAIM
6,000 militants KIA.
This means of the 21,720. A MAXIMUM of 72% can be civilian.. However, this number does not include PIJ deaths and Hamas made this claim 2 months ago meaning the civilian percentage is likely even LOWER.
But let's take an old claim, split it down the middle with Israel's current claim of 13,000. The result is 9,500. Let's conservatively add 500 PIJ deaths to that and we have 10,000.
With this method, which splits both sides down the middle compared against CONFIRMED DEATHS the result is:
54% are civilian. I can continue with more but either way.. The number is not what you say it is.
And don't bullshit me with the "estimates are much higher" Because in your Ukraine example, you posted confirmed numbers with no mention of "estimates" and you didn't feel the need to mention it.
The ONE source of 90% civilian casualties based their entire analysis on prior HAMAS sourced data which HAMAS admitted was erroneous.
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/artic...-of-10-of-those-killed-in-Gaza-are-civilians
Sources that claim 60-70%: Note that this claim was prior to ACTUAL CONFIRMED DEATHS were released.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)02640-5/fulltext
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news...-killing/0000018c-4cca-db23-ad9f-6cdae8ad0000
At this point it’s just funny to see how many lies you’ll manage to fit in a single post
Despite how it may appear, I like you. You're entertaining.
However, I would still have to rate this response 1.3/5