Breaking news: Malaysian Airlines System 370 B772 confirmed lost

The signal sender is waterproof, however the signal isn't. Radio/radar signals don't travel through water, not for long anyway. You have to be nearly on top of it to catch it.

They'll find it, like they found the Air France Airbus that crashed out of Rio a few years back.

Unfortunately, real life technology isn't quite up to Hollywood standards yet.

Black boxes can emit a signal for up to 30 days at depths around 20 000 ft I think, don't know what's the range of it though.

Let's hope this one isn't as hard as AF447 to find.
 
from av herald
Aviation sources in China report that radar data suggest a steep and sudden descent of the aircraft, during which the track of the aircraft changed from 024 degrees to 333 degrees. The aircraft was estimated to contact Ho Chi Minh Control Center (Vietnam) at 01:20L, but contact was never established.
malaysia_b772_9m-mro_gulf_of_thailand_140308_sat_1800.jpg



Aircraft was squawking 7700 according to flightradar24...

Starting to look like a fuselage breech and then ripped apart. Aircraft was not that old, the wingtip damage wasn't major as it was no where near the wing tank.
 
from av herald

malaysia_b772_9m-mro_gulf_of_thailand_140308_sat_1800.jpg



Aircraft was squawking 7700 according to flightradar24...

Starting to look like a fuselage breech and then ripped apart. Aircraft was not that old, the wingtip damage wasn't major as it was no where near the wing tank.

Imo C'est assez étrange qu'ils aient pris de temps d'afficher 7700 si l'avion s'est désintégré en plein vol...

Pis les causes d'une désintégration en plein vol sont assez peu nombreuses là! C'est quoi: Bombe, porte de soute mal fermée, stress structurel important (en palier à 35 000 pieds j'verrais pas comment ça aurait pu arriver...)
 
Some catastrophic for sure... Cargo door would have blown out on ascent as other accidents have shown.

This was caused UA811 had a cargo door blowout at 22000ft
United_Airlines_Flight_811.jpg


My gut tells me something more sinister here...
 
Dunno if it has been mentioned, but some Italian guy that was supposed to be on the plane actually wasn't because his passport was stolen back in August. Someone else was traveling with his passport....

Same for the Austrian guy. 2 stolen passports on this flight.

I'm really starting to think this aircraft blew up at 35 000 ft.
 
Ouais mais je catch pas. Si passeport a été volé en Août, il avait en masse le temps de s'en faire faire un autre...?
 
L'italien a renouvelé son passeport, avec un changement d'adresse mais n'a pas embarqué dans l'avion, ils est en vacances en Thaïlande pendant la disparition de l'avion. Mais il est quand même un passager enregistré dans l'avion disparu... C'est tu juste moi ? Ou il y a qqchose de bien croche ?
 
The entire situation is sketchy to the max

1. One of the safety aircraft in the world goes missing without a "trace" from level flight
2. Everyone is running around in circles trying to locate it
3. People with stolen passports were on the A/C
4. Information seems to be made up as we go along.

Welcome to aviation in Asia... Shocked they haven't blamed Boeing yet and grounded 777s in Asia.

Thank god the NTSB will be involved since it was a US made aircraft.
 
Ya this whole situation seems very sketchy and quite frankly doesn't add up. Plane must've been blown up by an onboard bomb or it was shot down by something. A plane that big doesn't just vanish into thin air, and certainly without a distress call.

Added visual:
flight-path-malaysia-airlines.png
 
Un expert sur radio-canada lance la thèse que la ligne aérienne Malaysian pourrait avoir mentit sur la disparition de l'avion sur les radars. La technologie de cet avion rend quasi-impossible la possibilité de le perdre de vue.

Je comprend toujours pas comment 2 passagers peuvent avoir embarqué avec des passeports déclarés volé, et pourquoi personne en parle?
 
Une chute de 35000 pieds va tout simplement désintégrer l'avion....


Souvenez vous le vol AF447 avec un Airbus A330 vieux de 4ans.... Ca l'a prit beaucoup de temps a retrouver le lieu du crash.
le MD-11 de SwissAir qui a été pulvérisé au large de la nouvelle-écosse (Peggy's Cove je crois?)
 
Oui mais avant ou pendant la chute, un signal de détresse aurait pu être émit. Sois ce signal a été émit et pour l'instant les authorités le cache pendant les recherches, ou il y a eu explosion à 35,000 pieds.

Ps: j'y vais avec mon intuition
 
Tout est sketchy.

Je vote de plus en plus pour une explosion à FL350 car je ne peux pas concevoir qu'aucun SOS a été lancé et qu'on ait perdu du radar un B777-200 comme ça, c'est juste impossible.
 
Une chute de 35000 pieds va tout simplement désintégrer l'avion....


Souvenez vous le vol AF447 avec un Airbus A330 vieux de 4ans.... Ca l'a prit beaucoup de temps a retrouver le lieu du crash.
le MD-11 de SwissAir qui a été pulvérisé au large de la nouvelle-écosse (Peggy's Cove je crois?)

Yeah but AF447 was flying in the middle of the atlantic without radar coverage and was also hundreds of miles off its route because of a storm so there was really no way to know where it crashed. This plane was on a route that has radar all the way. Can't believe they haven't found debris by now. Someone knows something and isn't talking.
 
Terrorism might be involved. You dont just use someone elses passport for a stupid reason and risk going to prison. I dont know how can you just cgange the picture on the passport? Dont they have their faces on their computer? Maybe not the malaysians only the home countries do

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top