News: 2011 Dodge Charger Revealed

ATR90

ATR90

New member
1010charger1.jpg


1010charger2.jpg


1010charger3.jpg


1010charger4.jpg


Source: http://www.montrealgazette.com/2011+Dodge+Charger+revealed/3626538/story.html

I must say... especially as an Intrepid owner, I LOVE THE NEW CHARGER!!!
 
I've always liked the front look but I don't know about the back....don't know if the taillights will look good on another color
 
Hate the spoiler, hate the wheels, hate the ooo look from far it almost look like i have hood ducts !!!! but overall its better than the last generation...

but i still think the charger name dosent belong on a 4 door v6 sedan.
 
Is it still a 4 door? Fail.
Does it have anything to do with any Charger from 66 to 74? Fail.

Fail.
 
Sure its a fail if you compare it to the original. You have to look at it like a totally new car, not a modern version of the legend.
 
the challenger is a coupe there not gonna make two almost identical cars 2 door with all the same options engines etc. I'm not crazy about it new or old it needs a full redesign but the SRT-8 i am crazy about :run:
 
Dubweiser said:
Fking jap fanboys

Charger > Civic

even better if it's worth 3.50$ in 4 years, since when is cheap RWD V8 a bad thing?
Click to expand...

haha true... but still back to the point.

if we stay in american cars. i would have this before the charger.


2011 Ford Taurus SHO AWD V6 Twin turbo
Taurus_SHO_2010_01.jpg
 
IonicRipper said:
Sure its a fail if you compare it to the original. You have to look at it like a totally new car, not a modern version of the legend.
Click to expand...
No, you have to look at it like a great way to sell cars to baby boomers, solely based on a name they vaguely remember to be hot shit.

It's not a bad looking car, it's basically a grocery getter with an agressive fascia and RWD. I don't have anything against grocery getters, I have something against using misleading names to sell things that have nothing to do with how they are called.
 
Dubweiser said:
Fking jap fanboys

Charger > Civic

even better if it's worth 3.50$ in 4 years, since when is cheap RWD V8 a bad thing?
Click to expand...

its not, the fact its shit to drive, loses 2/3 of its value in the first 3 years and isn't really comfortable is.
 
Don't compare the classic Charger to the current Charger.

After all, the LX platform replaces the LH platform, while the Charger is the direct replacement for the Intrepid. To me, the current Charger is a beefier, faster and RWD version of the Intrepid. I am astonished to see they brought back the one-piece taillight. IMO, this car is pure win. *tu*
 
Epic_Velocity said:
its not, the fact its shit to drive, loses 2/3 of its value in the first 3 years and isn't really comfortable is.
Click to expand...

That pretty much sums up all American cars contrary to what the American fanboys think. Hey don't get me wrong, the car looks great as do many American cars. Its probably fast, reliable and fun to drive as well. Its just a known fact that they all are worth nothing in 2-3 years because they just fall apart. There is no quality.
 
American automotive industry: tailored for those who can't afford real cars. *TM EV2010
 
errrr, no. I'm completely serious. That's my opinion. I'm not even trolling right now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top