infinite
Legacy Member
Orange man not too bad?
Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk
Orange man not too bad?
What do you think of lowest black unemployment rate in history?
reduced government, yes.Don't get mad because i'm calling a spade a spade. The Right believes in free trade, open borders and reduced government interventions in the economy. Your Trump does the exact opposite of that so i'm calling him and his supporters by the definition that applies to them.
Before it got taken over by nutjobs, the Republican party was pro-immigration. Just look at Reagan and both Bush speeches on immigration. You are confusing right vs left positions on economy with liberalism vs conservatism. Trumpism is located on the nationalist / interventionist economic policies side of the political spectrum.reduced government, yes.
open borders. what? since when? democrats want immigration, republicans do not. you got this mixed up. the rights want strong borders.
Your position is contrary to free capitalism.free trade. you got the wrong idea about 'free trade'; it doesn't mean anyone can do whatever they want. right believes in deregulation (related to point 1 in your list). That combined with the strong borders from point 2, it causes an ecosystem where local entities are free to compete in whichever way they see fit inside your borders. you can't just ignore an economic deficit, and the movement of wealth from your country to another. if you have a strong economy, other nations will buy your products and keep everyone in your country employed. if you buy elsewhere and you leave your own people on the street, it's not partisan politics, it's suicide.
I wish we had this version of him from 30 years ago.
my position is what I think makes sense. I'm not a hard liner. I'm not religious or anti abortion. I'm not an anarchist, so I believe that some things should be regulated. Greed is one of them, in order to avoid another TARP bailout for instance. I believe in not letting companies walk out for cheaper work force and reduced quality in favor of increased profitability. you want to move your manufacture to mexico? great. do it, I don't see a problem with that, just make sure you also sell the product in mexico or wherever else you want. The firebird plant in ste-therese is now a shopping mall. that tells me that pontiac wants canadian money and that's about it. Canada and the USA are about on par for a lot of things, so it makes sense for an alliance to be forged. but move production to china and it's a different story from every point of view.Before it got taken over by nutjobs, the Republican party was pro-immigration. Just look at Reagan and both Bush speeches on immigration. You are confusing right vs left positions on economy with liberalism vs conservatism. Trumpism is located on the nationalist / interventionist economic policies side of the political spectrum.
Your position is contrary to free capitalism.
What do you think of lowest black unemployment rate in history?
Maybe, but he also has acquired 30 years of wisdom since then. Smarts are great, wisdom is priceless. And yes, as dumb as Trump can sound when trying to make a point, it takes wisdom and experience to do what he's done. Also, you have to admit his message has always been consistent.
He's held it together pretty well considering he may be the most rabidly hated man in modern history, and most of it is illegitimate. Most people would have cracked by now.
Probably more to do with a strong economy and companies desperate to hire. When the economy slows, we will have to see if there is a rebound.
Is there a particular policy that you feel Trump has enacted that has led to this?
Probably more to do with a strong economy and companies desperate to hire. When the economy slows, we will have to see if there is a rebound.
Good for them I guess. That's an oddly specific, cherry picked metric. Correlation does not imply causation however.
To me, it's not about "being the smarter guy in the room" on every issue. That's just not possible. It's about finding these people and making them earn their paycheck. And more importantly, listening to what they have to say. I get the impression his ego may get in the way of that.
I'm not a fan of Piers Morgan, but I agree with what he says here. no viable candidate from the democrats, and the whole hate for Trump will only cause him to get re-elected. Also he has his ups and downs just like Obama and every other person. he's a liberal so I'm glad to see there still are reasonable people out there who don't throw blame blindly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtlJAybySJY
What do you think made the economy strong and companies desperate to hire?
You think Trump has no effect on the low black unemployment rate? OK fair. What caused the lowest black unemployment?
This comment shows you don't know Trump at all.
Yawn... they need some fresh blood.
Tulsi?
the fact that there is no viable democrat candidate is a sad thing.I also say the same thing, as well as many other people. Are we reasonable too?
The DNC supported Hillary over Bernie and they like sticking with the dinosaurs. Tulsi is fresh air and they would much rather go with a stale Warren before they support someone who thinks a little differently because they are uncertain about what she might do. The DNC doesn't want someone who thinks, but someone will repeat the tapes they have been handing out for the last 15 years. From what I've seen from Tulsi so far I think she might be a dark horse for the 2020 election whereas Warren is Hillary 2.0 and is bound to the same fate.I like her. But with Clinton scheming against her it’s going to be an uphill battle. I also think that not being from the continental 48 nor Christian will be a hindrance to her in many races. I hope she does well but I’m skeptical of her chances of winning the nomination. I think the “establishment” would rather support warren.
the fact that there is no viable democrat candidate is a sad thing.
There are far fewer people that are willing to admit that Obama had his flaws and Trump has his upside.
The DNC supported Hillary over Bernie and they like sticking with the dinosaurs. Tulsi is fresh air and they would much rather go with a stale Warren before they support someone who thinks a little differently because they are uncertain about what she might do. The DNC doesn't want someone who thinks, but someone will repeat the tapes they have been handing out for the last 15 years. From what I've seen from Tulsi so far I think she might be a dark horse for the 2020 election whereas Warren is Hillary 2.0 and is bound to the same fate.
Tulsi is leaps and bounds ahead of Yang, but her age plays against her. I think it's too soon for her to enter a race and she might not be taken seriously. In 2-3 terms from now she would probably be a favorite to the white house.
I like her. But with Clinton scheming against her it’s going to be an uphill battle. I also think that not being from the continental 48 nor Christian will be a hindrance to her in many races. I hope she does well but I’m skeptical of her chances of winning the nomination. I think the “establishment” would rather support warren.