illuminance
Legacy Member
they cannot practice law!
and jordan b peterson covering this over a month ago:
the lunatics (post modernist cultural marxists) are running the asylum :yikes:
Ontario lawyers must say they promote equality, or else after law society rejects exemption for conscientious objectors
An Ottawa lawyer compared the controversial statement of principles to Bart Simpson writing 'I will not be a bad boy again' on the blackboard — an empty gesture
Lawyers and paralegals in Ontario will be required to adopt and abide by a controversial statement of principles in order to remain licensed by the Law Society of Upper Canada.
After a heated and protracted debate at the law society’s governing convocation, this motion failed at midday Friday, meaning the rule is valid and will be enforced.
The official tally was not immediately available, but the vote was not overwhelmingly against. Many expressed support for the exemption for conscientious objectors, proposed by prominent Toronto lawyer Joe Groia
Even if someone means it, they should not be forced to say it, he argued. If they do not mean it, the statement is hollow and false. Groia said the law society should “find other and better ways to advance those goals” of equality and diversity.
One of the most striking defences of Groia’s motion came from bencher Anne Vespry, an Ottawa lawyer who compared the statement to Bart Simpson writing “I will not be a bad boy again” on the blackboard — an empty gesture.
She argued that, while it is possible some objectors to the statement are trying to conceal their own prejudice, many supporters are “wrapping themselves in the flag of equality and diversity” as a way to bully others into submission. She said she used to think disagreement was always the product of inadequate evidence, misunderstanding, poor application of rules, wilful blindness, or malice. But she has come to realize that conscience and faith can lead people of good will to vastly different perspectives that are not captured by simple rules.
She described herself as brown, biologicaly female, gender butch, queer, with a learning disability, mild physical disabilities depending on what the situation requires, and mild to moderate post traumatic stress disorder. She also used to work for Glad Day Bookshop, which sells literature aimed at a queer audience and has been at the centre of many legal fights over obscenity laws and free expression.
“I believe in free speech. I believe that controlling speech is a bad thing. When someone else controls our dialogue, people suffer,” she said. “Government censorship, government control of language killed people. People died because they did not get access to information.”
“Ambiguity is antithetical to clarity,” she said, and the statement of principles is “classically ambiguous language,” which can be interpreted “to mean kind of nothing at all.”
Before the vote, she said the failure of the motion would mean she will “look for a new career.”
FULL ARTICLE:
http://nationalpost.com/news/canada...y-they-promote-equality-or-else#comments-area
and jordan b peterson covering this over a month ago:
the lunatics (post modernist cultural marxists) are running the asylum :yikes: