Cyclonicks
Well-known member
L'écran le plus proche coute ≈400$ wshockley et c'est le même panneau ips que dans un imac 27"
A certification that certify it as a unix-like that act like Unix do not make it Unix. The background process are still derivatives, not True Unix
and anyway, since when does arstechnica and the likes of wired are considered as technicals references ?
L'écran le plus proche coute ≈400$ wshockley et c'est le même panneau ips que dans un imac 27"
Go to any coffee shops and you will see 90% of the people uses macs. Lots of companies now uses macs.
Rednecks still use PC's. Honestly, it's their loss for missing out the comfort of a mac. Use a goddamn mac for at least 1 week and then comment/argue. Most Mac users have already owned/used a PC and thus, can determine which one is better.
qu'est-ce que j'manque? lol
devrais-je élargir mes horizons encore? lol
This made me lol. Thanks.
Le plus drole est qu'une image ultra clair et surbrillante n'est souvent pas la bonne image... Passe un bluray de calibration sur ton écran d'ordinateur et c'est clair que tu es dans le champ.
Mais pour la pluspart du monde, plus c'est éblouissant, mieux c'est!
What are you a retard? In what way is a piece of shit TN panel comparable to a high-end IPS.
Yes you pay more for apple stuff but you get top quality parts and design.
Nearest monitor is the 27in ultrasharp at 1000 dollars, and it's a plastic-encased piece of shit with a plastic screen toplayer
People arguing PCs are better values than Mac are like people arguing that Kia is a better value than BMW
Products on a totally different plane of existence.
Yes they both o the same things but one is a premium product
If you wanna keep buying Kias, go for it but don't shit on people who can both afford and choose to go BMW.
By your logic we should all be wearing Timex, no name underwear, smoke Indian cigs, drink labatt bleue, drive Kia rios and live in trailer parks
Hey they're cheaper and just as functional right?